Cargando…

Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are more used in university hospitals, but the use of EMR by medical students at the workplace is still a challenge, because the conflict of interest between medical accountability for hospitals and quality of medical education programs for students. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solarte, Ivan, Könings, Karen D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0887-2
_version_ 1782514121350053888
author Solarte, Ivan
Könings, Karen D.
author_facet Solarte, Ivan
Könings, Karen D.
author_sort Solarte, Ivan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are more used in university hospitals, but the use of EMR by medical students at the workplace is still a challenge, because the conflict of interest between medical accountability for hospitals and quality of medical education programs for students. Therefore, this study investigates the use of EMR from the perspective of medical school deans and students, and determines their perceptions and concerns about consequences of restricted use of EMR by students on quality of education and patient care. METHODS: We administered a large-scale survey about the existence of EMR, existing policies, students’ use for learning, and consequences on patient care to 42 deans and 789 Residency Physician Applicants in a private university in Colombia. Data from 26 deans and 442 former graduated students were compared with independent t tests and chi square tests. RESULTS: Only half of medical schools had learning programs and policies about the use of EMR by students. Deans did not realize that students have less access to EMR than to paper-based MR. Perceptions of non-curricular learning opportunities how to write in (E)MR were significantly different between deans and students. Limiting students use of EMR has negative consequences on medical education, according to both deans and students, while deans worried significantly more about impact on patient care than students. Billing issues and liability aspects were their major concerns. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for a clear policy and educational program on the use of EMR by students. Discrepancies between the planned curriculum by deans and the real clinical learning environment as experienced by students indicate suboptimal learning opportunities for students. Creating powerful workplace-learning experiences and resolving concerns on students use of EMR has to be resolved in a constructive collaboration way between the involved stakeholders, including also EMR designers and hospital administrators. We recommend intense supervision of students’ work in EMR to take full advantage of the technological advances of EMR at the modern clinical site, both for patient care and for medical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5347834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53478342017-03-14 Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education Solarte, Ivan Könings, Karen D. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMR) are more used in university hospitals, but the use of EMR by medical students at the workplace is still a challenge, because the conflict of interest between medical accountability for hospitals and quality of medical education programs for students. Therefore, this study investigates the use of EMR from the perspective of medical school deans and students, and determines their perceptions and concerns about consequences of restricted use of EMR by students on quality of education and patient care. METHODS: We administered a large-scale survey about the existence of EMR, existing policies, students’ use for learning, and consequences on patient care to 42 deans and 789 Residency Physician Applicants in a private university in Colombia. Data from 26 deans and 442 former graduated students were compared with independent t tests and chi square tests. RESULTS: Only half of medical schools had learning programs and policies about the use of EMR by students. Deans did not realize that students have less access to EMR than to paper-based MR. Perceptions of non-curricular learning opportunities how to write in (E)MR were significantly different between deans and students. Limiting students use of EMR has negative consequences on medical education, according to both deans and students, while deans worried significantly more about impact on patient care than students. Billing issues and liability aspects were their major concerns. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for a clear policy and educational program on the use of EMR by students. Discrepancies between the planned curriculum by deans and the real clinical learning environment as experienced by students indicate suboptimal learning opportunities for students. Creating powerful workplace-learning experiences and resolving concerns on students use of EMR has to be resolved in a constructive collaboration way between the involved stakeholders, including also EMR designers and hospital administrators. We recommend intense supervision of students’ work in EMR to take full advantage of the technological advances of EMR at the modern clinical site, both for patient care and for medical education. BioMed Central 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5347834/ /pubmed/28288618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0887-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Solarte, Ivan
Könings, Karen D.
Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
title Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
title_full Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
title_fullStr Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
title_short Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
title_sort discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students’ use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0887-2
work_keys_str_mv AT solarteivan discrepanciesbetweenperceptionsofstudentsanddeansregardingtheconsequencesofrestrictingstudentsuseofelectronicmedicalrecordsonqualityofmedicaleducation
AT koningskarend discrepanciesbetweenperceptionsofstudentsanddeansregardingtheconsequencesofrestrictingstudentsuseofelectronicmedicalrecordsonqualityofmedicaleducation