Cargando…

Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy may improve outcomes in gastric cancer (GC), especially for the patients with advanced stage. To explore useful predictive factor for GC performing chemotherapy, we compared the tumor responses assessed using computed tomography (CT) with endoscopy based criteria. METHODS: 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tahara, Tomomitsu, Shibata, Tomoyuki, Okubo, Masaaki, Kawamura, Tomohiko, Horiguchi, Noriyuki, Yoshida, Dai, Ishizuka, Takamitsu, Nagasaka, Mitsuo, Nakagawa, Yoshihito, Ohmiya, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173663
_version_ 1782514158378418176
author Tahara, Tomomitsu
Shibata, Tomoyuki
Okubo, Masaaki
Kawamura, Tomohiko
Horiguchi, Noriyuki
Yoshida, Dai
Ishizuka, Takamitsu
Nagasaka, Mitsuo
Nakagawa, Yoshihito
Ohmiya, Naoki
author_facet Tahara, Tomomitsu
Shibata, Tomoyuki
Okubo, Masaaki
Kawamura, Tomohiko
Horiguchi, Noriyuki
Yoshida, Dai
Ishizuka, Takamitsu
Nagasaka, Mitsuo
Nakagawa, Yoshihito
Ohmiya, Naoki
author_sort Tahara, Tomomitsu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy may improve outcomes in gastric cancer (GC), especially for the patients with advanced stage. To explore useful predictive factor for GC performing chemotherapy, we compared the tumor responses assessed using computed tomography (CT) with endoscopy based criteria. METHODS: 192 GC patients performing chemotherapy were retrospectively studied. CT based response assessment was performed after 2 courses of treatment. Endoscopic evaluation according to The Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma was also performed at same period. Data were correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Majority of the cases (n = 178, 93%) received S-1 based chemotherapy as the first line treatment. 55 (29%) and 91 (47%) cases were considered to be CT and endoscopic responders. Endoscopic responder was more clearly associated with better OS and PFS compared to CT based responder by the log-rank test (P<0.0001 vs. 0.01 and P<0.0001 vs. 0.008, respectively). The association was more striking among patients performing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.0001 vs. 0.15 and P<0.0001 vs. 0.1, respectively). Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model revealed that endoscopic non-responder was the independent predictive factor, being more strongly associated with worse OS when compared to CT non-responder (hazard ratio: 4.60 vs. 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 2.83–7.49 vs.1.08–2.89, P<0.0001 vs. 0.02). More advanced T, N stage and cases who had peritoneal dissemination were significantly associated with endoscopic non-responder (all P values <0.01). CONCLUSION: Endoscopy based evaluation of primary lesions are clearly associated with prognosis in patients with GC who perform chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53480122017-03-30 Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy Tahara, Tomomitsu Shibata, Tomoyuki Okubo, Masaaki Kawamura, Tomohiko Horiguchi, Noriyuki Yoshida, Dai Ishizuka, Takamitsu Nagasaka, Mitsuo Nakagawa, Yoshihito Ohmiya, Naoki PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy may improve outcomes in gastric cancer (GC), especially for the patients with advanced stage. To explore useful predictive factor for GC performing chemotherapy, we compared the tumor responses assessed using computed tomography (CT) with endoscopy based criteria. METHODS: 192 GC patients performing chemotherapy were retrospectively studied. CT based response assessment was performed after 2 courses of treatment. Endoscopic evaluation according to The Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma was also performed at same period. Data were correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Majority of the cases (n = 178, 93%) received S-1 based chemotherapy as the first line treatment. 55 (29%) and 91 (47%) cases were considered to be CT and endoscopic responders. Endoscopic responder was more clearly associated with better OS and PFS compared to CT based responder by the log-rank test (P<0.0001 vs. 0.01 and P<0.0001 vs. 0.008, respectively). The association was more striking among patients performing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.0001 vs. 0.15 and P<0.0001 vs. 0.1, respectively). Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model revealed that endoscopic non-responder was the independent predictive factor, being more strongly associated with worse OS when compared to CT non-responder (hazard ratio: 4.60 vs. 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 2.83–7.49 vs.1.08–2.89, P<0.0001 vs. 0.02). More advanced T, N stage and cases who had peritoneal dissemination were significantly associated with endoscopic non-responder (all P values <0.01). CONCLUSION: Endoscopy based evaluation of primary lesions are clearly associated with prognosis in patients with GC who perform chemotherapy. Public Library of Science 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5348012/ /pubmed/28288188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173663 Text en © 2017 Tahara et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tahara, Tomomitsu
Shibata, Tomoyuki
Okubo, Masaaki
Kawamura, Tomohiko
Horiguchi, Noriyuki
Yoshida, Dai
Ishizuka, Takamitsu
Nagasaka, Mitsuo
Nakagawa, Yoshihito
Ohmiya, Naoki
Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
title Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
title_full Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
title_short Evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
title_sort evaluations of primary lesions by endoscopy clearly distinguishes prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173663
work_keys_str_mv AT taharatomomitsu evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT shibatatomoyuki evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT okubomasaaki evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT kawamuratomohiko evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT horiguchinoriyuki evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT yoshidadai evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT ishizukatakamitsu evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT nagasakamitsuo evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT nakagawayoshihito evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy
AT ohmiyanaoki evaluationsofprimarylesionsbyendoscopyclearlydistinguishesprognosisinpatientswithgastriccancerwhoreceivechemotherapy