Cargando…
Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat
A distinction has always been made between long-term and short-term memory (also now called working memory, WM). The obvious difference between these two kinds of memory concerns the duration of information storage: information is supposedly transiently stored in WM while it is considered durably co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173834 |
_version_ | 1782514160169385984 |
---|---|
author | Missaire, Mégane Fraize, Nicolas Joseph, Mickaël Antoine Hamieh, Al Mahdy Parmentier, Régis Marighetto, Aline Salin, Paul Antoine Malleret, Gaël |
author_facet | Missaire, Mégane Fraize, Nicolas Joseph, Mickaël Antoine Hamieh, Al Mahdy Parmentier, Régis Marighetto, Aline Salin, Paul Antoine Malleret, Gaël |
author_sort | Missaire, Mégane |
collection | PubMed |
description | A distinction has always been made between long-term and short-term memory (also now called working memory, WM). The obvious difference between these two kinds of memory concerns the duration of information storage: information is supposedly transiently stored in WM while it is considered durably consolidated into long-term memory. It is well acknowledged that the content of WM is erased and reset after a short time, to prevent irrelevant information from proactively interfering with newly stored information. In the present study, we used typical WM radial maze tasks to question the brief lifespan of spatial WM content in rodents. Groups of rats were submitted to one of two different WM tasks in a radial maze: a WM task involving the repetitive presentation of a same pair of arms expected to induce a high level of proactive interference (PI) (HIWM task), or a task using a different pair in each trial expected to induce a low level of PI (LIWM task). Performance was effectively lower in the HIWM group than in LIWM in the final trial of each training session, indicative of a “within-session/short-term” PI effect. However, we also observed a different “between-session/long-term” PI effect between the two groups: while performance of LIWM trained rats remained stable over days, the performance of HIWM rats dropped after 10 days of training, and this impairment was visible from the very first trial of the day, hence not attributable to within-session PI. We also showed that a 24 hour-gap across training sessions known to allow consolidation processes to unfold, was a necessary and sufficient condition for the long-term PI effect to occur. These findings suggest that in the HIWM task, WM content was not entirely reset between training sessions and that, in specific conditions, WM content can outlast its purpose by being stored more permanently, generating a long-term deleterious effect of PI. The alternative explanation is that WM content could be transferred and stored more permanently in an intermediary form or memory between WM and long-term memory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5348021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53480212017-03-30 Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat Missaire, Mégane Fraize, Nicolas Joseph, Mickaël Antoine Hamieh, Al Mahdy Parmentier, Régis Marighetto, Aline Salin, Paul Antoine Malleret, Gaël PLoS One Research Article A distinction has always been made between long-term and short-term memory (also now called working memory, WM). The obvious difference between these two kinds of memory concerns the duration of information storage: information is supposedly transiently stored in WM while it is considered durably consolidated into long-term memory. It is well acknowledged that the content of WM is erased and reset after a short time, to prevent irrelevant information from proactively interfering with newly stored information. In the present study, we used typical WM radial maze tasks to question the brief lifespan of spatial WM content in rodents. Groups of rats were submitted to one of two different WM tasks in a radial maze: a WM task involving the repetitive presentation of a same pair of arms expected to induce a high level of proactive interference (PI) (HIWM task), or a task using a different pair in each trial expected to induce a low level of PI (LIWM task). Performance was effectively lower in the HIWM group than in LIWM in the final trial of each training session, indicative of a “within-session/short-term” PI effect. However, we also observed a different “between-session/long-term” PI effect between the two groups: while performance of LIWM trained rats remained stable over days, the performance of HIWM rats dropped after 10 days of training, and this impairment was visible from the very first trial of the day, hence not attributable to within-session PI. We also showed that a 24 hour-gap across training sessions known to allow consolidation processes to unfold, was a necessary and sufficient condition for the long-term PI effect to occur. These findings suggest that in the HIWM task, WM content was not entirely reset between training sessions and that, in specific conditions, WM content can outlast its purpose by being stored more permanently, generating a long-term deleterious effect of PI. The alternative explanation is that WM content could be transferred and stored more permanently in an intermediary form or memory between WM and long-term memory. Public Library of Science 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5348021/ /pubmed/28288205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173834 Text en © 2017 Missaire et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Missaire, Mégane Fraize, Nicolas Joseph, Mickaël Antoine Hamieh, Al Mahdy Parmentier, Régis Marighetto, Aline Salin, Paul Antoine Malleret, Gaël Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
title | Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
title_full | Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
title_fullStr | Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
title_short | Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
title_sort | long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT missairemegane longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT fraizenicolas longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT josephmickaelantoine longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT hamiehalmahdy longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT parmentierregis longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT marighettoaline longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT salinpaulantoine longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat AT malleretgael longtermeffectsofinterferenceonshorttermmemoryperformanceintherat |