Cargando…
The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
The Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamil...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173608 |
_version_ | 1782514161771610112 |
---|---|
author | Wieczorek, Karina Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota Kajtoch, Łukasz Kanturski, Mariusz |
author_facet | Wieczorek, Karina Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota Kajtoch, Łukasz Kanturski, Mariusz |
author_sort | Wieczorek, Karina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamily, based on molecular and morphological datasets. Molecular analyses were based on the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear gene elongation factor-1α (EF-1α). Phylogenetic inferences were obtained individually on each of genes and joined alignments using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML). In phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes as well as a morphological dataset, the monophyly of Siphini and the genus Chaitophorus was supported. Periphyllus forms independent lineages from Chaitophorus and Siphini. Within this genus two clades comprising European and Asiatic species, respectively, were indicated. Concerning relationships within the subfamily, EF-1α and joined COI and EF-1α genes analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that Chaitophorini do not form a monophyletic clade. Periphyllus is a sister group to a clade containing Chaitophorus and Siphini. The Asiatic unit of Periphyllus also includes Trichaitophorus koyaensis. The analysis of morphological dataset under equally weighted parsimony also supports the view that Chaitophorini is an artificial taxon, as Lambersaphis pruinosae and Pseudopterocomma hughi, both traditionally included in the Chaitophorini, formed independent lineages. COI analyses support consistent groups within the subfamily, but relationships between groups are poorly resolved. These analyses were extended to include the species of closely related and phylogenetically unstudied subfamily Drepanosiphinae, which produced congruent results. Genera Drepanosiphum and Depanaphis are monophyletic and sister. The position of Yamatocallis tokyoensis differs in the molecular and morphological analyses, i.e. it is either an independent lineage (EF-1α, COI, joined COI and EF-1α genes) or is nested inside this unit (morphology). Our data also support separation of Chaitophorinae from Drepanosiphinae. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5348029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53480292017-03-30 The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data Wieczorek, Karina Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota Kajtoch, Łukasz Kanturski, Mariusz PLoS One Research Article The Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamily, based on molecular and morphological datasets. Molecular analyses were based on the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear gene elongation factor-1α (EF-1α). Phylogenetic inferences were obtained individually on each of genes and joined alignments using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML). In phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes as well as a morphological dataset, the monophyly of Siphini and the genus Chaitophorus was supported. Periphyllus forms independent lineages from Chaitophorus and Siphini. Within this genus two clades comprising European and Asiatic species, respectively, were indicated. Concerning relationships within the subfamily, EF-1α and joined COI and EF-1α genes analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that Chaitophorini do not form a monophyletic clade. Periphyllus is a sister group to a clade containing Chaitophorus and Siphini. The Asiatic unit of Periphyllus also includes Trichaitophorus koyaensis. The analysis of morphological dataset under equally weighted parsimony also supports the view that Chaitophorini is an artificial taxon, as Lambersaphis pruinosae and Pseudopterocomma hughi, both traditionally included in the Chaitophorini, formed independent lineages. COI analyses support consistent groups within the subfamily, but relationships between groups are poorly resolved. These analyses were extended to include the species of closely related and phylogenetically unstudied subfamily Drepanosiphinae, which produced congruent results. Genera Drepanosiphum and Depanaphis are monophyletic and sister. The position of Yamatocallis tokyoensis differs in the molecular and morphological analyses, i.e. it is either an independent lineage (EF-1α, COI, joined COI and EF-1α genes) or is nested inside this unit (morphology). Our data also support separation of Chaitophorinae from Drepanosiphinae. Public Library of Science 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5348029/ /pubmed/28288166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173608 Text en © 2017 Wieczorek et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wieczorek, Karina Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota Kajtoch, Łukasz Kanturski, Mariusz The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
title | The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
title_full | The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
title_fullStr | The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
title_short | The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
title_sort | relationships within the chaitophorinae and drepanosiphinae (hemiptera, aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wieczorekkarina therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT lachowskacierlikdorota therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT kajtochłukasz therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT kanturskimariusz therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT wieczorekkarina relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT lachowskacierlikdorota relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT kajtochłukasz relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata AT kanturskimariusz relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata |