Cargando…

The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data

The Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wieczorek, Karina, Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota, Kajtoch, Łukasz, Kanturski, Mariusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173608
_version_ 1782514161771610112
author Wieczorek, Karina
Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota
Kajtoch, Łukasz
Kanturski, Mariusz
author_facet Wieczorek, Karina
Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota
Kajtoch, Łukasz
Kanturski, Mariusz
author_sort Wieczorek, Karina
collection PubMed
description The Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamily, based on molecular and morphological datasets. Molecular analyses were based on the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear gene elongation factor-1α (EF-1α). Phylogenetic inferences were obtained individually on each of genes and joined alignments using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML). In phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes as well as a morphological dataset, the monophyly of Siphini and the genus Chaitophorus was supported. Periphyllus forms independent lineages from Chaitophorus and Siphini. Within this genus two clades comprising European and Asiatic species, respectively, were indicated. Concerning relationships within the subfamily, EF-1α and joined COI and EF-1α genes analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that Chaitophorini do not form a monophyletic clade. Periphyllus is a sister group to a clade containing Chaitophorus and Siphini. The Asiatic unit of Periphyllus also includes Trichaitophorus koyaensis. The analysis of morphological dataset under equally weighted parsimony also supports the view that Chaitophorini is an artificial taxon, as Lambersaphis pruinosae and Pseudopterocomma hughi, both traditionally included in the Chaitophorini, formed independent lineages. COI analyses support consistent groups within the subfamily, but relationships between groups are poorly resolved. These analyses were extended to include the species of closely related and phylogenetically unstudied subfamily Drepanosiphinae, which produced congruent results. Genera Drepanosiphum and Depanaphis are monophyletic and sister. The position of Yamatocallis tokyoensis differs in the molecular and morphological analyses, i.e. it is either an independent lineage (EF-1α, COI, joined COI and EF-1α genes) or is nested inside this unit (morphology). Our data also support separation of Chaitophorinae from Drepanosiphinae.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53480292017-03-30 The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data Wieczorek, Karina Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota Kajtoch, Łukasz Kanturski, Mariusz PLoS One Research Article The Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamily, based on molecular and morphological datasets. Molecular analyses were based on the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear gene elongation factor-1α (EF-1α). Phylogenetic inferences were obtained individually on each of genes and joined alignments using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML). In phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes as well as a morphological dataset, the monophyly of Siphini and the genus Chaitophorus was supported. Periphyllus forms independent lineages from Chaitophorus and Siphini. Within this genus two clades comprising European and Asiatic species, respectively, were indicated. Concerning relationships within the subfamily, EF-1α and joined COI and EF-1α genes analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that Chaitophorini do not form a monophyletic clade. Periphyllus is a sister group to a clade containing Chaitophorus and Siphini. The Asiatic unit of Periphyllus also includes Trichaitophorus koyaensis. The analysis of morphological dataset under equally weighted parsimony also supports the view that Chaitophorini is an artificial taxon, as Lambersaphis pruinosae and Pseudopterocomma hughi, both traditionally included in the Chaitophorini, formed independent lineages. COI analyses support consistent groups within the subfamily, but relationships between groups are poorly resolved. These analyses were extended to include the species of closely related and phylogenetically unstudied subfamily Drepanosiphinae, which produced congruent results. Genera Drepanosiphum and Depanaphis are monophyletic and sister. The position of Yamatocallis tokyoensis differs in the molecular and morphological analyses, i.e. it is either an independent lineage (EF-1α, COI, joined COI and EF-1α genes) or is nested inside this unit (morphology). Our data also support separation of Chaitophorinae from Drepanosiphinae. Public Library of Science 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5348029/ /pubmed/28288166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173608 Text en © 2017 Wieczorek et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wieczorek, Karina
Lachowska-Cierlik, Dorota
Kajtoch, Łukasz
Kanturski, Mariusz
The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
title The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
title_full The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
title_fullStr The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
title_full_unstemmed The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
title_short The relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
title_sort relationships within the chaitophorinae and drepanosiphinae (hemiptera, aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173608
work_keys_str_mv AT wieczorekkarina therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT lachowskacierlikdorota therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT kajtochłukasz therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT kanturskimariusz therelationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT wieczorekkarina relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT lachowskacierlikdorota relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT kajtochłukasz relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata
AT kanturskimariusz relationshipswithinthechaitophorinaeanddrepanosiphinaehemipteraaphididaeinferredfrommolecularbasedphylogenyandcomprehensivemorphologicaldata