Cargando…

Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability

BACKGROUND: This study compared therapeutic azole plasma trough levels (APL) of the azole antimycotics itraconazole (ITR), voriconazole (VOR), and posaconazole (POS) in lung transplant recipients and analyzed the influencing factors. In addition, intrapatient variability for each azole was determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelzer, Daniela, Weber, Alexandra, Ihle, Franziska, Matthes, Sandhya, Ceelen, Felix, Zimmermann, Gregor, Kneidinger, Nikolaus, Schramm, Rene, Winter, Hauke, Zoller, Michael, Vogeser, Michael, Behr, Juergen, Neurohr, Claus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000371
_version_ 1782514172386344960
author Stelzer, Daniela
Weber, Alexandra
Ihle, Franziska
Matthes, Sandhya
Ceelen, Felix
Zimmermann, Gregor
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Schramm, Rene
Winter, Hauke
Zoller, Michael
Vogeser, Michael
Behr, Juergen
Neurohr, Claus
author_facet Stelzer, Daniela
Weber, Alexandra
Ihle, Franziska
Matthes, Sandhya
Ceelen, Felix
Zimmermann, Gregor
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Schramm, Rene
Winter, Hauke
Zoller, Michael
Vogeser, Michael
Behr, Juergen
Neurohr, Claus
author_sort Stelzer, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compared therapeutic azole plasma trough levels (APL) of the azole antimycotics itraconazole (ITR), voriconazole (VOR), and posaconazole (POS) in lung transplant recipients and analyzed the influencing factors. In addition, intrapatient variability for each azole was determined. METHODS: From July 2012 to July 2015, 806 APL of ITR, VOR, posaconazole liquid (POS-Liq), and posaconazole tablets (POS-Tab) were measured in 173 patients of the Munich Lung Transplantation Program. Therapeutic APL were defined as follows: ITR, ≥700 ng/mL; VOR, 1000–5500 ng/mL; and POS, ≥700 ng/mL (prophylaxis) and ≥1000 ng/mL (therapy). RESULTS: VOR and POS-Tab reached the highest number of therapeutic APL, whereas POS-Liq showed the lowest percentage (therapy: ITR 50%, VOR 70%, POS-Liq 38%, and POS-Tab 82%; prophylaxis: ITR 62%, VOR 85%, POS-Liq 49%, and POS-Tab 76%). Risk factors for subtherapeutic APL of all azoles were the azole dose (ITR, P < 0.001; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.006) and age over 60 years (ITR, P = 0.003; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.039; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). Cystic fibrosis was a significant risk factor for subtherapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Tab (VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Tab, P = 0.005). Double lung transplantation (LTx) was significantly associated with less therapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Liq (VOR, P = 0.030; POS-Liq, P < 0.001). Concomitant therapy with 80 mg pantoprazole led to significantly fewer therapeutic POS APL as compared to 40 mg (POS-Liq, P = 0.015; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). VOR displayed the greatest intrapatient variability (46%), whereas POS-Tab showed the lowest (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that VOR and POS-Tab achieve the highest percentage of therapeutic APL in patients with LTx; POS-Tab showed the lowest intrapatient variability. APL are significantly influenced by azole dose, age, cystic fibrosis, type of LTx, and comedication with proton-pump inhibitors. Considering the high number of subtherapeutic APL, therapeutic drug monitoring should be integrated in the post-LTx management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53481072017-03-22 Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability Stelzer, Daniela Weber, Alexandra Ihle, Franziska Matthes, Sandhya Ceelen, Felix Zimmermann, Gregor Kneidinger, Nikolaus Schramm, Rene Winter, Hauke Zoller, Michael Vogeser, Michael Behr, Juergen Neurohr, Claus Ther Drug Monit Original Article BACKGROUND: This study compared therapeutic azole plasma trough levels (APL) of the azole antimycotics itraconazole (ITR), voriconazole (VOR), and posaconazole (POS) in lung transplant recipients and analyzed the influencing factors. In addition, intrapatient variability for each azole was determined. METHODS: From July 2012 to July 2015, 806 APL of ITR, VOR, posaconazole liquid (POS-Liq), and posaconazole tablets (POS-Tab) were measured in 173 patients of the Munich Lung Transplantation Program. Therapeutic APL were defined as follows: ITR, ≥700 ng/mL; VOR, 1000–5500 ng/mL; and POS, ≥700 ng/mL (prophylaxis) and ≥1000 ng/mL (therapy). RESULTS: VOR and POS-Tab reached the highest number of therapeutic APL, whereas POS-Liq showed the lowest percentage (therapy: ITR 50%, VOR 70%, POS-Liq 38%, and POS-Tab 82%; prophylaxis: ITR 62%, VOR 85%, POS-Liq 49%, and POS-Tab 76%). Risk factors for subtherapeutic APL of all azoles were the azole dose (ITR, P < 0.001; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.006) and age over 60 years (ITR, P = 0.003; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.039; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). Cystic fibrosis was a significant risk factor for subtherapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Tab (VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Tab, P = 0.005). Double lung transplantation (LTx) was significantly associated with less therapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Liq (VOR, P = 0.030; POS-Liq, P < 0.001). Concomitant therapy with 80 mg pantoprazole led to significantly fewer therapeutic POS APL as compared to 40 mg (POS-Liq, P = 0.015; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). VOR displayed the greatest intrapatient variability (46%), whereas POS-Tab showed the lowest (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that VOR and POS-Tab achieve the highest percentage of therapeutic APL in patients with LTx; POS-Tab showed the lowest intrapatient variability. APL are significantly influenced by azole dose, age, cystic fibrosis, type of LTx, and comedication with proton-pump inhibitors. Considering the high number of subtherapeutic APL, therapeutic drug monitoring should be integrated in the post-LTx management. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2017-04 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5348107/ /pubmed/28282366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000371 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Stelzer, Daniela
Weber, Alexandra
Ihle, Franziska
Matthes, Sandhya
Ceelen, Felix
Zimmermann, Gregor
Kneidinger, Nikolaus
Schramm, Rene
Winter, Hauke
Zoller, Michael
Vogeser, Michael
Behr, Juergen
Neurohr, Claus
Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
title Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
title_full Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
title_fullStr Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
title_short Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
title_sort comparing azole plasma trough levels in lung transplant recipients: percentage of therapeutic levels and intrapatient variability
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000371
work_keys_str_mv AT stelzerdaniela comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT weberalexandra comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT ihlefranziska comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT matthessandhya comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT ceelenfelix comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT zimmermanngregor comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT kneidingernikolaus comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT schrammrene comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT winterhauke comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT zollermichael comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT vogesermichael comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT behrjuergen comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability
AT neurohrclaus comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability