Cargando…
Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability
BACKGROUND: This study compared therapeutic azole plasma trough levels (APL) of the azole antimycotics itraconazole (ITR), voriconazole (VOR), and posaconazole (POS) in lung transplant recipients and analyzed the influencing factors. In addition, intrapatient variability for each azole was determine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000371 |
_version_ | 1782514172386344960 |
---|---|
author | Stelzer, Daniela Weber, Alexandra Ihle, Franziska Matthes, Sandhya Ceelen, Felix Zimmermann, Gregor Kneidinger, Nikolaus Schramm, Rene Winter, Hauke Zoller, Michael Vogeser, Michael Behr, Juergen Neurohr, Claus |
author_facet | Stelzer, Daniela Weber, Alexandra Ihle, Franziska Matthes, Sandhya Ceelen, Felix Zimmermann, Gregor Kneidinger, Nikolaus Schramm, Rene Winter, Hauke Zoller, Michael Vogeser, Michael Behr, Juergen Neurohr, Claus |
author_sort | Stelzer, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study compared therapeutic azole plasma trough levels (APL) of the azole antimycotics itraconazole (ITR), voriconazole (VOR), and posaconazole (POS) in lung transplant recipients and analyzed the influencing factors. In addition, intrapatient variability for each azole was determined. METHODS: From July 2012 to July 2015, 806 APL of ITR, VOR, posaconazole liquid (POS-Liq), and posaconazole tablets (POS-Tab) were measured in 173 patients of the Munich Lung Transplantation Program. Therapeutic APL were defined as follows: ITR, ≥700 ng/mL; VOR, 1000–5500 ng/mL; and POS, ≥700 ng/mL (prophylaxis) and ≥1000 ng/mL (therapy). RESULTS: VOR and POS-Tab reached the highest number of therapeutic APL, whereas POS-Liq showed the lowest percentage (therapy: ITR 50%, VOR 70%, POS-Liq 38%, and POS-Tab 82%; prophylaxis: ITR 62%, VOR 85%, POS-Liq 49%, and POS-Tab 76%). Risk factors for subtherapeutic APL of all azoles were the azole dose (ITR, P < 0.001; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.006) and age over 60 years (ITR, P = 0.003; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.039; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). Cystic fibrosis was a significant risk factor for subtherapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Tab (VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Tab, P = 0.005). Double lung transplantation (LTx) was significantly associated with less therapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Liq (VOR, P = 0.030; POS-Liq, P < 0.001). Concomitant therapy with 80 mg pantoprazole led to significantly fewer therapeutic POS APL as compared to 40 mg (POS-Liq, P = 0.015; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). VOR displayed the greatest intrapatient variability (46%), whereas POS-Tab showed the lowest (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that VOR and POS-Tab achieve the highest percentage of therapeutic APL in patients with LTx; POS-Tab showed the lowest intrapatient variability. APL are significantly influenced by azole dose, age, cystic fibrosis, type of LTx, and comedication with proton-pump inhibitors. Considering the high number of subtherapeutic APL, therapeutic drug monitoring should be integrated in the post-LTx management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5348107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Therapeutic Drug Monitoring |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53481072017-03-22 Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability Stelzer, Daniela Weber, Alexandra Ihle, Franziska Matthes, Sandhya Ceelen, Felix Zimmermann, Gregor Kneidinger, Nikolaus Schramm, Rene Winter, Hauke Zoller, Michael Vogeser, Michael Behr, Juergen Neurohr, Claus Ther Drug Monit Original Article BACKGROUND: This study compared therapeutic azole plasma trough levels (APL) of the azole antimycotics itraconazole (ITR), voriconazole (VOR), and posaconazole (POS) in lung transplant recipients and analyzed the influencing factors. In addition, intrapatient variability for each azole was determined. METHODS: From July 2012 to July 2015, 806 APL of ITR, VOR, posaconazole liquid (POS-Liq), and posaconazole tablets (POS-Tab) were measured in 173 patients of the Munich Lung Transplantation Program. Therapeutic APL were defined as follows: ITR, ≥700 ng/mL; VOR, 1000–5500 ng/mL; and POS, ≥700 ng/mL (prophylaxis) and ≥1000 ng/mL (therapy). RESULTS: VOR and POS-Tab reached the highest number of therapeutic APL, whereas POS-Liq showed the lowest percentage (therapy: ITR 50%, VOR 70%, POS-Liq 38%, and POS-Tab 82%; prophylaxis: ITR 62%, VOR 85%, POS-Liq 49%, and POS-Tab 76%). Risk factors for subtherapeutic APL of all azoles were the azole dose (ITR, P < 0.001; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.006) and age over 60 years (ITR, P = 0.003; VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Liq, P = 0.039; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). Cystic fibrosis was a significant risk factor for subtherapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Tab (VOR, P = 0.002; POS-Tab, P = 0.005). Double lung transplantation (LTx) was significantly associated with less therapeutic APL for VOR and POS-Liq (VOR, P = 0.030; POS-Liq, P < 0.001). Concomitant therapy with 80 mg pantoprazole led to significantly fewer therapeutic POS APL as compared to 40 mg (POS-Liq, P = 0.015; POS-Tab, P < 0.001). VOR displayed the greatest intrapatient variability (46%), whereas POS-Tab showed the lowest (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that VOR and POS-Tab achieve the highest percentage of therapeutic APL in patients with LTx; POS-Tab showed the lowest intrapatient variability. APL are significantly influenced by azole dose, age, cystic fibrosis, type of LTx, and comedication with proton-pump inhibitors. Considering the high number of subtherapeutic APL, therapeutic drug monitoring should be integrated in the post-LTx management. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2017-04 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5348107/ /pubmed/28282366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000371 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stelzer, Daniela Weber, Alexandra Ihle, Franziska Matthes, Sandhya Ceelen, Felix Zimmermann, Gregor Kneidinger, Nikolaus Schramm, Rene Winter, Hauke Zoller, Michael Vogeser, Michael Behr, Juergen Neurohr, Claus Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability |
title | Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability |
title_full | Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability |
title_fullStr | Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability |
title_short | Comparing Azole Plasma Trough Levels in Lung Transplant Recipients: Percentage of Therapeutic Levels and Intrapatient Variability |
title_sort | comparing azole plasma trough levels in lung transplant recipients: percentage of therapeutic levels and intrapatient variability |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28282366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stelzerdaniela comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT weberalexandra comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT ihlefranziska comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT matthessandhya comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT ceelenfelix comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT zimmermanngregor comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT kneidingernikolaus comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT schrammrene comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT winterhauke comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT zollermichael comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT vogesermichael comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT behrjuergen comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability AT neurohrclaus comparingazoleplasmatroughlevelsinlungtransplantrecipientspercentageoftherapeuticlevelsandintrapatientvariability |