Cargando…

Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance

Many journal editors are a failing to implement their own authors’ instructions, resulting in the publication of many articles that do not meet basic standards of transparency, employ unsuitable data analysis methods and report overly optimistic conclusions. This problem is particularly acute where...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bustin, Stephen A., Huggett, Jim F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.01.002
_version_ 1782514173790388224
author Bustin, Stephen A.
Huggett, Jim F.
author_facet Bustin, Stephen A.
Huggett, Jim F.
author_sort Bustin, Stephen A.
collection PubMed
description Many journal editors are a failing to implement their own authors’ instructions, resulting in the publication of many articles that do not meet basic standards of transparency, employ unsuitable data analysis methods and report overly optimistic conclusions. This problem is particularly acute where quantitative measurements are made and results in the publication of papers that lack scientific rigor and contributes to the concerns with regard to the reproducibility of biomedical research. This hampers research areas such as biomarker identification, as reproducing all but the most striking changes is challenging and translation to patient care rare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53481162017-03-22 Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance Bustin, Stephen A. Huggett, Jim F. Biomol Detect Quantif Editorial Many journal editors are a failing to implement their own authors’ instructions, resulting in the publication of many articles that do not meet basic standards of transparency, employ unsuitable data analysis methods and report overly optimistic conclusions. This problem is particularly acute where quantitative measurements are made and results in the publication of papers that lack scientific rigor and contributes to the concerns with regard to the reproducibility of biomedical research. This hampers research areas such as biomarker identification, as reproducing all but the most striking changes is challenging and translation to patient care rare. Elsevier 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5348116/ /pubmed/28331813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.01.002 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier GmbH. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Editorial
Bustin, Stephen A.
Huggett, Jim F.
Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
title Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
title_full Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
title_fullStr Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
title_short Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance
title_sort reproducibility of biomedical research – the importance of editorial vigilance
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bustinstephena reproducibilityofbiomedicalresearchtheimportanceofeditorialvigilance
AT huggettjimf reproducibilityofbiomedicalresearchtheimportanceofeditorialvigilance