Cargando…

Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study

BACKGROUND: Positional change affects the cuff pressure of an endotracheal tube (ETT) in treacheally intubated patients. We compared the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard ETT and a cylindrical ETT after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery. METHODS: Fifty-two patients aged 18–70 years unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Eunkyung, Park, Yongmin, Jeon, Younghoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28272230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006257
_version_ 1782514186934288384
author Choi, Eunkyung
Park, Yongmin
Jeon, Younghoon
author_facet Choi, Eunkyung
Park, Yongmin
Jeon, Younghoon
author_sort Choi, Eunkyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positional change affects the cuff pressure of an endotracheal tube (ETT) in treacheally intubated patients. We compared the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard ETT and a cylindrical ETT after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery. METHODS: Fifty-two patients aged 18–70 years underwent a tympanomastoidectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive endotracheal intubation with cylindrical (group C, n = 26) or TaperGuard ETTs (group T, n = 26). After endotracheal intubation, the ETT cuff pressure was set at 22 cmH(2)O in the neutral position of head. After lateral rotation of head, the cuff pressure was measured again and readjusted to 22 cmH(2)O. In addition, the change of distance from the carina to the tip of the ETT was measured before and after the positional change. The incidence of cough, sore throat, and hoarseness was assessed at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic data between groups. After lateral rotation of head, the cuff pressure significantly increased in group T (11.9 ± 2.3 cmH(2)O) compared with group C (6.0 ± 1.9 cmH(2)O) (P < 0.001). The incidence of a cuff pressure >30 cmH(2)O was higher in group T (96.2%) than in group C (30.8%) (P < 0.001). In addition, the degree of displacement of an ETT was greater in group T (11.0 ± 1.7 mm) than in group C (7.2 ± 2.6 mm) (P < 0.001). The overall incidences of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and cough at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours after surgery were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSION: The cuff pressure was higher in the TaperGuard ETT than in the cylindrical ETT after positional change of head from neutral to lateral rotation. In addition, after a positional change, the extent of displacement of ETT was greater in the TaperGuard ETT than in the cylindrical ETT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53481782017-03-22 Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study Choi, Eunkyung Park, Yongmin Jeon, Younghoon Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Positional change affects the cuff pressure of an endotracheal tube (ETT) in treacheally intubated patients. We compared the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard ETT and a cylindrical ETT after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery. METHODS: Fifty-two patients aged 18–70 years underwent a tympanomastoidectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive endotracheal intubation with cylindrical (group C, n = 26) or TaperGuard ETTs (group T, n = 26). After endotracheal intubation, the ETT cuff pressure was set at 22 cmH(2)O in the neutral position of head. After lateral rotation of head, the cuff pressure was measured again and readjusted to 22 cmH(2)O. In addition, the change of distance from the carina to the tip of the ETT was measured before and after the positional change. The incidence of cough, sore throat, and hoarseness was assessed at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic data between groups. After lateral rotation of head, the cuff pressure significantly increased in group T (11.9 ± 2.3 cmH(2)O) compared with group C (6.0 ± 1.9 cmH(2)O) (P < 0.001). The incidence of a cuff pressure >30 cmH(2)O was higher in group T (96.2%) than in group C (30.8%) (P < 0.001). In addition, the degree of displacement of an ETT was greater in group T (11.0 ± 1.7 mm) than in group C (7.2 ± 2.6 mm) (P < 0.001). The overall incidences of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and cough at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours after surgery were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSION: The cuff pressure was higher in the TaperGuard ETT than in the cylindrical ETT after positional change of head from neutral to lateral rotation. In addition, after a positional change, the extent of displacement of ETT was greater in the TaperGuard ETT than in the cylindrical ETT. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5348178/ /pubmed/28272230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006257 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Choi, Eunkyung
Park, Yongmin
Jeon, Younghoon
Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
title Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
title_full Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
title_fullStr Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
title_short Comparison of the cuff pressure of a TaperGuard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: A single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
title_sort comparison of the cuff pressure of a taperguard endotracheal tube and a cylindrical endotracheal tube after lateral rotation of head during middle ear surgery: a single-blind, randomized clinical consort study
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28272230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006257
work_keys_str_mv AT choieunkyung comparisonofthecuffpressureofataperguardendotrachealtubeandacylindricalendotrachealtubeafterlateralrotationofheadduringmiddleearsurgeryasingleblindrandomizedclinicalconsortstudy
AT parkyongmin comparisonofthecuffpressureofataperguardendotrachealtubeandacylindricalendotrachealtubeafterlateralrotationofheadduringmiddleearsurgeryasingleblindrandomizedclinicalconsortstudy
AT jeonyounghoon comparisonofthecuffpressureofataperguardendotrachealtubeandacylindricalendotrachealtubeafterlateralrotationofheadduringmiddleearsurgeryasingleblindrandomizedclinicalconsortstudy