Cargando…
Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic?
We prospectively evaluated afebrile patients admitted to an emergency department (ED), with suspected infection and only tachycardia or tachypnea. The white blood cell count (WBC) was obtained, and patients were considered septic if leukocyte count was >12,000 μL–1 or <4000 μL–1 or with >10...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28272257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006299 |
_version_ | 1782514193201627136 |
---|---|
author | Martins, Fernanda de Souza Guedes, Gisele Giuliane Santos, Thiago Martins de Carvalho-Filho, Marco A. |
author_facet | Martins, Fernanda de Souza Guedes, Gisele Giuliane Santos, Thiago Martins de Carvalho-Filho, Marco A. |
author_sort | Martins, Fernanda de Souza |
collection | PubMed |
description | We prospectively evaluated afebrile patients admitted to an emergency department (ED), with suspected infection and only tachycardia or tachypnea. The white blood cell count (WBC) was obtained, and patients were considered septic if leukocyte count was >12,000 μL–1 or <4000 μL–1 or with >10% of band forms. Clinical data were collected to examine whether sepsis could be predicted. Seventy patients were included and 37 (52.86%) met sepsis criteria. Self-measured fever showed an odds ratio (OR) of 5.936 (CI95% 1.450–24.295; P = 0.0133) and increased pulse pressure (PP) showed an OR of 1.405 (CI95% 1.004–1.964; P = 0.0471) on multivariate analysis. When vital signs were included in multivariate analysis, the heart rate showed an OR of 2.112 (CI95% 1.400–3.188; P = 0.0004). Self-measured fever and mean arterial pressure <70 mm Hg had high positive likelihood ratios (3.86 and 2.08, respectively). The nomogram for self-measured fever showed an increase of sepsis chance from 53% (pretest) to approximately 80% (post-test). The recognition of self-measured fever, increased PP, and the intensity of heart rate response may improve sepsis recognition in afebrile patients with tachycardia or tachypnea. These results are important for medical assessment of sepsis in remote areas, crowded and low-resourced EDs, and low-income countries, where WBC may not be readily available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5348205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53482052017-03-22 Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? Martins, Fernanda de Souza Guedes, Gisele Giuliane Santos, Thiago Martins de Carvalho-Filho, Marco A. Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 We prospectively evaluated afebrile patients admitted to an emergency department (ED), with suspected infection and only tachycardia or tachypnea. The white blood cell count (WBC) was obtained, and patients were considered septic if leukocyte count was >12,000 μL–1 or <4000 μL–1 or with >10% of band forms. Clinical data were collected to examine whether sepsis could be predicted. Seventy patients were included and 37 (52.86%) met sepsis criteria. Self-measured fever showed an odds ratio (OR) of 5.936 (CI95% 1.450–24.295; P = 0.0133) and increased pulse pressure (PP) showed an OR of 1.405 (CI95% 1.004–1.964; P = 0.0471) on multivariate analysis. When vital signs were included in multivariate analysis, the heart rate showed an OR of 2.112 (CI95% 1.400–3.188; P = 0.0004). Self-measured fever and mean arterial pressure <70 mm Hg had high positive likelihood ratios (3.86 and 2.08, respectively). The nomogram for self-measured fever showed an increase of sepsis chance from 53% (pretest) to approximately 80% (post-test). The recognition of self-measured fever, increased PP, and the intensity of heart rate response may improve sepsis recognition in afebrile patients with tachycardia or tachypnea. These results are important for medical assessment of sepsis in remote areas, crowded and low-resourced EDs, and low-income countries, where WBC may not be readily available. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5348205/ /pubmed/28272257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006299 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5400 Martins, Fernanda de Souza Guedes, Gisele Giuliane Santos, Thiago Martins de Carvalho-Filho, Marco A. Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? |
title | Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? |
title_full | Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? |
title_fullStr | Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? |
title_full_unstemmed | Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? |
title_short | Suspected infection in afebrile patients: Are they septic? |
title_sort | suspected infection in afebrile patients: are they septic? |
topic | 5400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28272257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinsfernandadesouza suspectedinfectioninafebrilepatientsaretheyseptic AT guedesgiselegiuliane suspectedinfectioninafebrilepatientsaretheyseptic AT santosthiagomartins suspectedinfectioninafebrilepatientsaretheyseptic AT decarvalhofilhomarcoa suspectedinfectioninafebrilepatientsaretheyseptic |