Cargando…

The role of antiangiogenic agents in the treatment of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The survival of advanced gastric cancer (GC) is dismal, and effects of antiangiogenic agents remain inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to assess combination of chemotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy versus traditional chemotherapy. METHODS: To achieve the goal of scientific rig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Xuefen, Wang, Feng, Ke, Yang, Wei, Dong, Gu, Hou, Zhang, Zhixian, Jiang, Lifeng, Lv, Li, Lin, Jie, Wang, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28272258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006301
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The survival of advanced gastric cancer (GC) is dismal, and effects of antiangiogenic agents remain inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to assess combination of chemotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy versus traditional chemotherapy. METHODS: To achieve the goal of scientific rigor, statistics from both referenced works and experiments were analyzed. We carefully searched for the referenced works by retrieving, as well as analyzing, literature databases for information on antiangiogenic therapy compared to other therapeutic approaches used to treat GC patients. Two groups were defined in the experiment: experimental and control groups. The experimental group was treated with antiangiogenic drug, and the control group was treated with standard chemotherapy or placebo. RESULTS: The study included a total of 3240 participants. Overall, there was significant improvement in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67–0.91, P = 0.002), progression-free survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52–0.81, P = 0.0002), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.33–1.88, P < 0.00001), and disease control rate (RR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.57–3.78, P < 0.0001) in the group with antiangiogenic drug versus the group with standard chemotherapy or placebo. Moreover, this new treatment approach showed tolerable toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the superior efficacy of combination therapy with antiangiogenic agents in comparison to traditional chemotherapy regimens for patients with GC. Moreover, this new treatment approach showed tolerable toxicity. This meta-analysis provides important information for clinicians who are interested in using antiangiogenic therapies to treat GC patients.