Cargando…
Authors’ Reply to: Critique of “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions” – Does Location of the Device Matter?
Autores principales: | Dominick, Gregory M, Winfree, Kyle N, Pohlig, Ryan T, Papas, Mia A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242593 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7413 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions
por: Dominick, Gregory M, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Critique of: “Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions”
por: Migueles, Jairo H, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Author Reply – SOFA-based Prognostication in PICU: A Cardiovascular Critique!
por: Lois, Amoolya, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
SASSI: A REPLY TO THE CRITIQUE OF FELDSTEIN & MILLER (2007)
por: LAZOWSKI, LINDA E, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
A Short Critique on the Stance of the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority on Melamine Polymer Formaldehyde Exposures
por: Hanekamp, Jaap C.
Publicado: (2021)