Cargando…

Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS), a progressive demyelinating disease of the brain and spinal cord, is the leading cause of nontraumatic neurological damage in young adults. Canada has one of the highest reported incidents of MS, with estimates between 55 and 240 per 100,000 individuals. Between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakker, Caitlin, Stephenson, Carol, Stephenson, Erin, Chaves, Debbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242594
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6250
_version_ 1782514268846948352
author Bakker, Caitlin
Stephenson, Carol
Stephenson, Erin
Chaves, Debbie
author_facet Bakker, Caitlin
Stephenson, Carol
Stephenson, Erin
Chaves, Debbie
author_sort Bakker, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS), a progressive demyelinating disease of the brain and spinal cord, is the leading cause of nontraumatic neurological damage in young adults. Canada has one of the highest reported incidents of MS, with estimates between 55 and 240 per 100,000 individuals. Between 2009 and 2014, the MS Society of Canada provided over Can $90 million to researchers and, since 2013, has encouraged researchers to make both current and previous research products openly available. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to determine the open access (OA) cost implications and repository policies of journals frequently used by a sample of MS researchers. This study benchmarked current publishing preferences by MS Society of Canada researchers by examining the OA full-text availability of journal articles written by researchers funded between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: Researchers were identified from the 2009 to 2014 annual MS Society of Canada Research Summaries. Articles were identified through searches in Web of Science, Scopus, Medline and Embase (both via OVID). Journal level analysis included comparison of OA policies, including article processing charges (APCs) and repository policies. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 758 articles analyzed in this study, of which 288 (38.0%) were OA articles. The majority of authors were still relying on journal policies for deposit in PubMed Central or availability on publisher websites for OA. Gold OA journals accounted for 10.2% of the journals in this study and were associated with significantly lower APCs (US $1900) than in hybrid journals (US $3000). Review of the journal self-archiving options highlighted the complexity of stipulations that authors would have to navigate to legally deposit a version of their article. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that there are currently researcher- and publisher-imposed barriers to both the gold and green roads to OA. These results provide a current benchmark against which efforts to enhance openness can be measured and can serve as a reference point in future assessments of the impact of OA policies within this field. With funding agencies worldwide releasing OA mandates, future success in compliance will require changes to how researchers and publishers approach production and dissemination of research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53486182017-03-28 Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research Bakker, Caitlin Stephenson, Carol Stephenson, Erin Chaves, Debbie J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS), a progressive demyelinating disease of the brain and spinal cord, is the leading cause of nontraumatic neurological damage in young adults. Canada has one of the highest reported incidents of MS, with estimates between 55 and 240 per 100,000 individuals. Between 2009 and 2014, the MS Society of Canada provided over Can $90 million to researchers and, since 2013, has encouraged researchers to make both current and previous research products openly available. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to determine the open access (OA) cost implications and repository policies of journals frequently used by a sample of MS researchers. This study benchmarked current publishing preferences by MS Society of Canada researchers by examining the OA full-text availability of journal articles written by researchers funded between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: Researchers were identified from the 2009 to 2014 annual MS Society of Canada Research Summaries. Articles were identified through searches in Web of Science, Scopus, Medline and Embase (both via OVID). Journal level analysis included comparison of OA policies, including article processing charges (APCs) and repository policies. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 758 articles analyzed in this study, of which 288 (38.0%) were OA articles. The majority of authors were still relying on journal policies for deposit in PubMed Central or availability on publisher websites for OA. Gold OA journals accounted for 10.2% of the journals in this study and were associated with significantly lower APCs (US $1900) than in hybrid journals (US $3000). Review of the journal self-archiving options highlighted the complexity of stipulations that authors would have to navigate to legally deposit a version of their article. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that there are currently researcher- and publisher-imposed barriers to both the gold and green roads to OA. These results provide a current benchmark against which efforts to enhance openness can be measured and can serve as a reference point in future assessments of the impact of OA policies within this field. With funding agencies worldwide releasing OA mandates, future success in compliance will require changes to how researchers and publishers approach production and dissemination of research. JMIR Publications 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5348618/ /pubmed/28242594 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6250 Text en ©Caitlin Bakker, Carol Stephenson, Erin Stephenson, Debbie Chaves. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 27.02.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bakker, Caitlin
Stephenson, Carol
Stephenson, Erin
Chaves, Debbie
Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research
title Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research
title_full Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research
title_fullStr Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research
title_full_unstemmed Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research
title_short Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research
title_sort public funding and open access to research: a review of canadian multiple sclerosis research
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28242594
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6250
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkercaitlin publicfundingandopenaccesstoresearchareviewofcanadianmultiplesclerosisresearch
AT stephensoncarol publicfundingandopenaccesstoresearchareviewofcanadianmultiplesclerosisresearch
AT stephensonerin publicfundingandopenaccesstoresearchareviewofcanadianmultiplesclerosisresearch
AT chavesdebbie publicfundingandopenaccesstoresearchareviewofcanadianmultiplesclerosisresearch