Cargando…

Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production

BACKGROUND: The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Sierk, Antonissen, Kay, Hoefnagels, Ric, Lonza, Laura, Wang, Michael, Faaij, André, Junginger, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7
_version_ 1782514325176451072
author de Jong, Sierk
Antonissen, Kay
Hoefnagels, Ric
Lonza, Laura
Wang, Michael
Faaij, André
Junginger, Martin
author_facet de Jong, Sierk
Antonissen, Kay
Hoefnagels, Ric
Lonza, Laura
Wang, Michael
Faaij, André
Junginger, Martin
author_sort de Jong, Sierk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). RESULTS: Fischer–Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86–104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77–80%) and sugarcane- (71–75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60–75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity). CONCLUSIONS: Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53487972017-03-14 Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production de Jong, Sierk Antonissen, Kay Hoefnagels, Ric Lonza, Laura Wang, Michael Faaij, André Junginger, Martin Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). RESULTS: Fischer–Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86–104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77–80%) and sugarcane- (71–75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60–75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity). CONCLUSIONS: Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5348797/ /pubmed/28293294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
de Jong, Sierk
Antonissen, Kay
Hoefnagels, Ric
Lonza, Laura
Wang, Michael
Faaij, André
Junginger, Martin
Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
title Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
title_full Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
title_fullStr Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
title_full_unstemmed Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
title_short Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
title_sort life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0739-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongsierk lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction
AT antonissenkay lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction
AT hoefnagelsric lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction
AT lonzalaura lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction
AT wangmichael lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction
AT faaijandre lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction
AT jungingermartin lifecycleanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfromrenewablejetfuelproduction