Cargando…

Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?

BACKGROUND: Falls affect approx. 30% of elderly population per year. They cause major injuries and reduce independence of the older adults’ functioning. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the degree of independence and find the fall risk factors in the study group. METHODS: The study in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talarska, Dorota, Strugała, Magdalena, Szewczyczak, Marlena, Tobis, Sławomir, Michalak, Michał, Wróblewska, Izabela, Wieczorowska – Tobis, Katarzyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0461-0
_version_ 1782514342874316800
author Talarska, Dorota
Strugała, Magdalena
Szewczyczak, Marlena
Tobis, Sławomir
Michalak, Michał
Wróblewska, Izabela
Wieczorowska – Tobis, Katarzyna
author_facet Talarska, Dorota
Strugała, Magdalena
Szewczyczak, Marlena
Tobis, Sławomir
Michalak, Michał
Wróblewska, Izabela
Wieczorowska – Tobis, Katarzyna
author_sort Talarska, Dorota
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls affect approx. 30% of elderly population per year. They cause major injuries and reduce independence of the older adults’ functioning. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the degree of independence and find the fall risk factors in the study group. METHODS: The study included 506 – older adults. The study group included patients from GP clinics and members of two senior centers. The study duration was 12 months. Our study tools included EASY- Care Standard 2010 questionnaire, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), Index Barthel, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Timed Up and Go (TUG). RESULTS: The study included 357 (70.6%) female and 149 (29.4%) male subjects. The mean age of the study group patients was 75.7 years ± 8.0. Most of the older adult subjects were independent in both basic (Index Barthel) and instrumental (IADL) activities. Gait fluency evaluated in TUG scale found slow and unsteady gait in 33.7% of the subjects. 27.5% of the subjects used mobility aids when walking. In the Risk of falls scale, 131 subjects (25.89%) were at risk of falls. According to logistic regression the main risk of fall determinants (p <0.05) in the study group were: age, previous falls, feet problems, lack of regular care, impaired vision, urinary incontinence, pain, sleeping disorders, and lowered mood. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of falls increases in people less independent in terms of basic and complex life activities and in people with depression. Most of the risk factors can be modified. It is necessary to develop a standard procedure aimed at preventing falls in the elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53488702017-03-14 Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls? Talarska, Dorota Strugała, Magdalena Szewczyczak, Marlena Tobis, Sławomir Michalak, Michał Wróblewska, Izabela Wieczorowska – Tobis, Katarzyna BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Falls affect approx. 30% of elderly population per year. They cause major injuries and reduce independence of the older adults’ functioning. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the degree of independence and find the fall risk factors in the study group. METHODS: The study included 506 – older adults. The study group included patients from GP clinics and members of two senior centers. The study duration was 12 months. Our study tools included EASY- Care Standard 2010 questionnaire, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), Index Barthel, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Timed Up and Go (TUG). RESULTS: The study included 357 (70.6%) female and 149 (29.4%) male subjects. The mean age of the study group patients was 75.7 years ± 8.0. Most of the older adult subjects were independent in both basic (Index Barthel) and instrumental (IADL) activities. Gait fluency evaluated in TUG scale found slow and unsteady gait in 33.7% of the subjects. 27.5% of the subjects used mobility aids when walking. In the Risk of falls scale, 131 subjects (25.89%) were at risk of falls. According to logistic regression the main risk of fall determinants (p <0.05) in the study group were: age, previous falls, feet problems, lack of regular care, impaired vision, urinary incontinence, pain, sleeping disorders, and lowered mood. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of falls increases in people less independent in terms of basic and complex life activities and in people with depression. Most of the risk factors can be modified. It is necessary to develop a standard procedure aimed at preventing falls in the elderly. BioMed Central 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5348870/ /pubmed/28288563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0461-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Talarska, Dorota
Strugała, Magdalena
Szewczyczak, Marlena
Tobis, Sławomir
Michalak, Michał
Wróblewska, Izabela
Wieczorowska – Tobis, Katarzyna
Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
title Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
title_full Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
title_fullStr Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
title_full_unstemmed Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
title_short Is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
title_sort is independence of older adults safe considering the risk of falls?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0461-0
work_keys_str_mv AT talarskadorota isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls
AT strugałamagdalena isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls
AT szewczyczakmarlena isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls
AT tobissławomir isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls
AT michalakmichał isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls
AT wroblewskaizabela isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls
AT wieczorowskatobiskatarzyna isindependenceofolderadultssafeconsideringtheriskoffalls