Cargando…

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for research in hand osteoarthritis, but imaging the thin cartilage layers in the hand joints remains challenging. We therefore assessed the accuracy of MRI in detecting cartilage loss in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saltzherr, Michael S., Coert, J. Henk, Selles, Ruud W., van Neck, Johan W., Jaquet, Jean-Bart, van Osch, Gerjo J. V. M., Oei, Edwin H. G., Luime, Jolanda J., Muradin, Galied S. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1262-8
_version_ 1782514354065768448
author Saltzherr, Michael S.
Coert, J. Henk
Selles, Ruud W.
van Neck, Johan W.
Jaquet, Jean-Bart
van Osch, Gerjo J. V. M.
Oei, Edwin H. G.
Luime, Jolanda J.
Muradin, Galied S. R.
author_facet Saltzherr, Michael S.
Coert, J. Henk
Selles, Ruud W.
van Neck, Johan W.
Jaquet, Jean-Bart
van Osch, Gerjo J. V. M.
Oei, Edwin H. G.
Luime, Jolanda J.
Muradin, Galied S. R.
author_sort Saltzherr, Michael S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for research in hand osteoarthritis, but imaging the thin cartilage layers in the hand joints remains challenging. We therefore assessed the accuracy of MRI in detecting cartilage loss in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal (CMC1) joint. METHODS: Twelve patients scheduled for trapeziectomy to treat severe symptomatic osteoarthritis of the CMC1 joint underwent a preoperative high resolution 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) MRI scan. Subsequently, the resected trapezium was evaluated histologically. The sections were scored for cartilage damage severity (Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) score), and extent of damage (percentage surface area). Each MRI scan was scored for the area of normal cartilage, partial cartilage loss and full cartilage loss. The percentages of the total surface area with any cartilage loss and full-thickness cartilage loss were calculated using MRI and histological evaluation. RESULTS: MRI and histological evaluation both identified large areas of overall cartilage loss. The median (IQR) surface area of any cartilage loss on MRI was 98% (82–100%), and on histological assessment 96% (87–98%). However, MRI underestimated the extent of full-thickness cartilage loss. The median (IQR) surface area of full-thickness cartilage loss on MRI was 43% (22–70%), and on histological evaluation 79% (67–85%). The difference was caused by a thin layer of high signal on the articulating surface, which was interpreted as damaged cartilage on MRI but which was not identified on histological evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional SPGR MRI of the CMC1 joint demonstrates overall cartilage damage, but underestimates full-thickness cartilage loss in patients with advanced osteoarthritis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53489042017-03-14 Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation Saltzherr, Michael S. Coert, J. Henk Selles, Ruud W. van Neck, Johan W. Jaquet, Jean-Bart van Osch, Gerjo J. V. M. Oei, Edwin H. G. Luime, Jolanda J. Muradin, Galied S. R. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for research in hand osteoarthritis, but imaging the thin cartilage layers in the hand joints remains challenging. We therefore assessed the accuracy of MRI in detecting cartilage loss in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal (CMC1) joint. METHODS: Twelve patients scheduled for trapeziectomy to treat severe symptomatic osteoarthritis of the CMC1 joint underwent a preoperative high resolution 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) MRI scan. Subsequently, the resected trapezium was evaluated histologically. The sections were scored for cartilage damage severity (Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) score), and extent of damage (percentage surface area). Each MRI scan was scored for the area of normal cartilage, partial cartilage loss and full cartilage loss. The percentages of the total surface area with any cartilage loss and full-thickness cartilage loss were calculated using MRI and histological evaluation. RESULTS: MRI and histological evaluation both identified large areas of overall cartilage loss. The median (IQR) surface area of any cartilage loss on MRI was 98% (82–100%), and on histological assessment 96% (87–98%). However, MRI underestimated the extent of full-thickness cartilage loss. The median (IQR) surface area of full-thickness cartilage loss on MRI was 43% (22–70%), and on histological evaluation 79% (67–85%). The difference was caused by a thin layer of high signal on the articulating surface, which was interpreted as damaged cartilage on MRI but which was not identified on histological evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional SPGR MRI of the CMC1 joint demonstrates overall cartilage damage, but underestimates full-thickness cartilage loss in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. BioMed Central 2017-03-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5348904/ /pubmed/28288684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1262-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saltzherr, Michael S.
Coert, J. Henk
Selles, Ruud W.
van Neck, Johan W.
Jaquet, Jean-Bart
van Osch, Gerjo J. V. M.
Oei, Edwin H. G.
Luime, Jolanda J.
Muradin, Galied S. R.
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
title Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
title_full Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
title_fullStr Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
title_short Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
title_sort accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: comparison with histological evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1262-8
work_keys_str_mv AT saltzherrmichaels accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT coertjhenk accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT sellesruudw accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT vanneckjohanw accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT jaquetjeanbart accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT vanoschgerjojvm accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT oeiedwinhg accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT luimejolandaj accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation
AT muradingaliedsr accuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingtodetectcartilagelossinsevereosteoarthritisofthefirstcarpometacarpaljointcomparisonwithhistologicalevaluation