Cargando…

Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Australian Government approval in 2012 for the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) allows general practitioners (GPs) to provide early gestation abortion in primary care settings. However, uptake of the MTOP provision by GPs appears to be low a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawson, Angela J., Nicolls, Rachel, Bateson, Deborah, Doab, Anna, Estoesta, Jane, Brassil, Ann, Sullivan, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0303-8
_version_ 1782514355284213760
author Dawson, Angela J.
Nicolls, Rachel
Bateson, Deborah
Doab, Anna
Estoesta, Jane
Brassil, Ann
Sullivan, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Dawson, Angela J.
Nicolls, Rachel
Bateson, Deborah
Doab, Anna
Estoesta, Jane
Brassil, Ann
Sullivan, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Dawson, Angela J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Australian Government approval in 2012 for the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) allows general practitioners (GPs) to provide early gestation abortion in primary care settings. However, uptake of the MTOP provision by GPs appears to be low and the reasons for this have been unclear. This study investigated the provision of and referral for MTOP by GPs. METHODS: We undertook descriptive-interpretive qualitative research and selected participants for diversity using a matrix. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and one focus group (N = 4), were conducted with 32 GPs (8 MTOP providers, 24 non MTOP providers) in New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework to examine access to abortion services was used to develop the interview questions and emergent themes identified thematically. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged: scope of practice; MTOP demand, care and referral; and workforce needs. Many GPs saw abortion as beyond the scope of their practice (i.e. a service others provide in specialist private clinics). Some GPs had religious or moral objections; others regarded MTOP provision as complicated and difficult. While some GPs expressed interest in MTOP provision they were concerned about stigma and the impact it may have on perceptions of their practice and the views of colleagues. Despite a reported variance in demand most MTOP providers were busy but felt isolated. Difficulties in referral to a local public hospital in the case of complications or the provision of surgical abortion were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Exploring the factors which affect access to MTOP in general practice settings provides insights to assist the future planning and delivery of reproductive health services. This research identifies the need for support to increase the number of MTOP GP providers and for GPs who are currently providing MTOP. Alongside these actions provision in the public sector is required. In addition, formalised referral pathways to the public sector are required to ensure timely care in the case of complications or the provision of surgical options. Leadership and coordination across the health sector is needed to facilitate integrated abortion care particularly for rural and low income women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5348908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53489082017-03-14 Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study Dawson, Angela J. Nicolls, Rachel Bateson, Deborah Doab, Anna Estoesta, Jane Brassil, Ann Sullivan, Elizabeth A. Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Australian Government approval in 2012 for the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) allows general practitioners (GPs) to provide early gestation abortion in primary care settings. However, uptake of the MTOP provision by GPs appears to be low and the reasons for this have been unclear. This study investigated the provision of and referral for MTOP by GPs. METHODS: We undertook descriptive-interpretive qualitative research and selected participants for diversity using a matrix. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and one focus group (N = 4), were conducted with 32 GPs (8 MTOP providers, 24 non MTOP providers) in New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A framework to examine access to abortion services was used to develop the interview questions and emergent themes identified thematically. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged: scope of practice; MTOP demand, care and referral; and workforce needs. Many GPs saw abortion as beyond the scope of their practice (i.e. a service others provide in specialist private clinics). Some GPs had religious or moral objections; others regarded MTOP provision as complicated and difficult. While some GPs expressed interest in MTOP provision they were concerned about stigma and the impact it may have on perceptions of their practice and the views of colleagues. Despite a reported variance in demand most MTOP providers were busy but felt isolated. Difficulties in referral to a local public hospital in the case of complications or the provision of surgical abortion were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Exploring the factors which affect access to MTOP in general practice settings provides insights to assist the future planning and delivery of reproductive health services. This research identifies the need for support to increase the number of MTOP GP providers and for GPs who are currently providing MTOP. Alongside these actions provision in the public sector is required. In addition, formalised referral pathways to the public sector are required to ensure timely care in the case of complications or the provision of surgical options. Leadership and coordination across the health sector is needed to facilitate integrated abortion care particularly for rural and low income women. BioMed Central 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5348908/ /pubmed/28288649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0303-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dawson, Angela J.
Nicolls, Rachel
Bateson, Deborah
Doab, Anna
Estoesta, Jane
Brassil, Ann
Sullivan, Elizabeth A.
Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
title Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
title_full Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
title_fullStr Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
title_short Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
title_sort medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5348908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0303-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dawsonangelaj medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy
AT nicollsrachel medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy
AT batesondeborah medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy
AT doabanna medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy
AT estoestajane medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy
AT brassilann medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy
AT sullivanelizabetha medicalterminationofpregnancyingeneralpracticeinaustraliaadescriptiveinterpretivequalitativestudy