Cargando…

Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of coronal and sagittal CT sections to detect cavities simulating root resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 mandibular incisors were embedded in plaster bases, and cavities with 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LERMEN, Cláudio Afonso, LIEDKE, Gabriela Salatino, da SILVEIRA, Heloísa Emília Dias, da SILVEIRA, Heraldo Luis Dias, MAZZSOLA, Alessandro André, de FIGUEIREDO, José Antônio Poli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20857012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300019
_version_ 1782514389189918720
author LERMEN, Cláudio Afonso
LIEDKE, Gabriela Salatino
da SILVEIRA, Heloísa Emília Dias
da SILVEIRA, Heraldo Luis Dias
MAZZSOLA, Alessandro André
de FIGUEIREDO, José Antônio Poli
author_facet LERMEN, Cláudio Afonso
LIEDKE, Gabriela Salatino
da SILVEIRA, Heloísa Emília Dias
da SILVEIRA, Heraldo Luis Dias
MAZZSOLA, Alessandro André
de FIGUEIREDO, José Antônio Poli
author_sort LERMEN, Cláudio Afonso
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of coronal and sagittal CT sections to detect cavities simulating root resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 mandibular incisors were embedded in plaster bases, and cavities with 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large cavities) were drilled on the buccal surfaces with high-speed round burs with diameters of 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm to simulate external inflammatory root resorption. Simulations in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of each tooth root were made randomly. The Dental Scan software was used to obtain 1-mm-thick axial images from direct scanning, which were reconstructed in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D software (Syngo FastView). Each series was loaded into the software. Fourteen images of each tooth were reconstructed in the coronal plane and 14 in the sagittal plane. A total of 1,652 images were obtained for analysis. Series information, tooth number and the plane reconstructed were stored. The images generated were saved on a CD-ROM together with the visualization software (Syngo FastView). Images were analyzed by a previously calibrated blinded, radiologist. Cochran’s Q test was conducted separately for each region analyzed followed by pair-wise comparison by the McNemar test (p=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in the diagnosis of simulated resorption between the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. When the axial plane was assessed separately, diagnoses were statistically different (p<0.05) among the three root thirds. The apical third differed significantly (p<0.05) from the cervical and middle thirds. Diagnostic errors were more often observed in the apical third compared to the cervical and middle thirds. Mid-sized cavities revealed no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between planes, irrespective of the third in which the resorptions were located. CONCLUSION: When tomographic sections are requested for the diagnosis of buccal or lingual external root resorption, sagittal sections afford the best image characterization of the resorption process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53490462017-03-17 Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption LERMEN, Cláudio Afonso LIEDKE, Gabriela Salatino da SILVEIRA, Heloísa Emília Dias da SILVEIRA, Heraldo Luis Dias MAZZSOLA, Alessandro André de FIGUEIREDO, José Antônio Poli J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of coronal and sagittal CT sections to detect cavities simulating root resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 mandibular incisors were embedded in plaster bases, and cavities with 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large cavities) were drilled on the buccal surfaces with high-speed round burs with diameters of 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm to simulate external inflammatory root resorption. Simulations in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of each tooth root were made randomly. The Dental Scan software was used to obtain 1-mm-thick axial images from direct scanning, which were reconstructed in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D software (Syngo FastView). Each series was loaded into the software. Fourteen images of each tooth were reconstructed in the coronal plane and 14 in the sagittal plane. A total of 1,652 images were obtained for analysis. Series information, tooth number and the plane reconstructed were stored. The images generated were saved on a CD-ROM together with the visualization software (Syngo FastView). Images were analyzed by a previously calibrated blinded, radiologist. Cochran’s Q test was conducted separately for each region analyzed followed by pair-wise comparison by the McNemar test (p=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in the diagnosis of simulated resorption between the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. When the axial plane was assessed separately, diagnoses were statistically different (p<0.05) among the three root thirds. The apical third differed significantly (p<0.05) from the cervical and middle thirds. Diagnostic errors were more often observed in the apical third compared to the cervical and middle thirds. Mid-sized cavities revealed no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between planes, irrespective of the third in which the resorptions were located. CONCLUSION: When tomographic sections are requested for the diagnosis of buccal or lingual external root resorption, sagittal sections afford the best image characterization of the resorption process. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC5349046/ /pubmed/20857012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300019 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
LERMEN, Cláudio Afonso
LIEDKE, Gabriela Salatino
da SILVEIRA, Heloísa Emília Dias
da SILVEIRA, Heraldo Luis Dias
MAZZSOLA, Alessandro André
de FIGUEIREDO, José Antônio Poli
Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_full Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_fullStr Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_short Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_sort comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20857012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300019
work_keys_str_mv AT lermenclaudioafonso comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT liedkegabrielasalatino comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT dasilveiraheloisaemiliadias comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT dasilveiraheraldoluisdias comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT mazzsolaalessandroandre comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT defigueiredojoseantoniopoli comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption