Cargando…

Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis

OBJECTIVE: Using strain gauge (SG) analysis, the aim of this in vitro study was quantify the strain development during the fixation of three-unit screw implant-supported fixed partial dentures, varying the types of implant-abutment joints and the type of prosthetic coping. The hypotheses were that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: NISHIOKA, Renato Sussumu, NISHIOKA, Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo, ABREU, Celina Wanderley, de VASCONCELLOS, Luis Gustavo Oliveira, BALDUCCI, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300005
_version_ 1782514393309773824
author NISHIOKA, Renato Sussumu
NISHIOKA, Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo
ABREU, Celina Wanderley
de VASCONCELLOS, Luis Gustavo Oliveira
BALDUCCI, Ivan
author_facet NISHIOKA, Renato Sussumu
NISHIOKA, Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo
ABREU, Celina Wanderley
de VASCONCELLOS, Luis Gustavo Oliveira
BALDUCCI, Ivan
author_sort NISHIOKA, Renato Sussumu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Using strain gauge (SG) analysis, the aim of this in vitro study was quantify the strain development during the fixation of three-unit screw implant-supported fixed partial dentures, varying the types of implant-abutment joints and the type of prosthetic coping. The hypotheses were that the type of hexagonal connection would generate different microstrains and the type of copings would produce similar microstrains after prosthetic screws had been tightened onto microunit abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dental implants with external (EH) and internal (IH) hexagonal configurations were inserted into two polyurethane blocks. Microunit abutments were screwed onto their respective implant groups, applying a torque of 20 Ncm. Machined Co-Cr copings (M) and plastic prosthetic copings (P) were screwed onto the abutments, which received standard wax patterns. The wax patterns were cast in Co-Cr alloy (n=5), forming four groups: G1) EH/M; G2) EH/P; G3) IH/M and G4) IH/P. Four SGs were bonded onto the surface of the block tangentially to the implants, SG 1 mesially to implant 1, SG 2 and SG 3 mesially and distally to implant 2, respectively, and SG 4 distally to implant 3. The superstructure’s occlusal screws were tightened onto microunit abutments with 10 Ncm torque using a manual torque driver. The magnitude of microstrain on each SG was recorded in units of microstrain (µε). The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Microstrain values of each group were: G1= 338.1±223.0 µε; G2= 363.9±190.9 µε; G3= 415.1±53.5 µε; G4= 363.9±190.9 µε. No statistically significant difference was found between EH and IH, regardless of the type of copings (p>0.05). The hypotheses were partially accepted. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the type of hexagonal connection and coping presented similar mechanical behavior under tightening conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53490592017-03-17 Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis NISHIOKA, Renato Sussumu NISHIOKA, Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo ABREU, Celina Wanderley de VASCONCELLOS, Luis Gustavo Oliveira BALDUCCI, Ivan J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Using strain gauge (SG) analysis, the aim of this in vitro study was quantify the strain development during the fixation of three-unit screw implant-supported fixed partial dentures, varying the types of implant-abutment joints and the type of prosthetic coping. The hypotheses were that the type of hexagonal connection would generate different microstrains and the type of copings would produce similar microstrains after prosthetic screws had been tightened onto microunit abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three dental implants with external (EH) and internal (IH) hexagonal configurations were inserted into two polyurethane blocks. Microunit abutments were screwed onto their respective implant groups, applying a torque of 20 Ncm. Machined Co-Cr copings (M) and plastic prosthetic copings (P) were screwed onto the abutments, which received standard wax patterns. The wax patterns were cast in Co-Cr alloy (n=5), forming four groups: G1) EH/M; G2) EH/P; G3) IH/M and G4) IH/P. Four SGs were bonded onto the surface of the block tangentially to the implants, SG 1 mesially to implant 1, SG 2 and SG 3 mesially and distally to implant 2, respectively, and SG 4 distally to implant 3. The superstructure’s occlusal screws were tightened onto microunit abutments with 10 Ncm torque using a manual torque driver. The magnitude of microstrain on each SG was recorded in units of microstrain (µε). The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Microstrain values of each group were: G1= 338.1±223.0 µε; G2= 363.9±190.9 µε; G3= 415.1±53.5 µε; G4= 363.9±190.9 µε. No statistically significant difference was found between EH and IH, regardless of the type of copings (p>0.05). The hypotheses were partially accepted. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the type of hexagonal connection and coping presented similar mechanical behavior under tightening conditions. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC5349059/ /pubmed/20856998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300005 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
NISHIOKA, Renato Sussumu
NISHIOKA, Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo
ABREU, Celina Wanderley
de VASCONCELLOS, Luis Gustavo Oliveira
BALDUCCI, Ivan
Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
title Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
title_full Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
title_fullStr Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
title_short Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
title_sort machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implantabutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000300005
work_keys_str_mv AT nishiokarenatosussumu machinedandplasticcopingsinthreeelementprostheseswithdifferenttypesofimplantabutmentjointsastraingaugecomparativeanalysis
AT nishiokaleanogueirabraulinodemelo machinedandplasticcopingsinthreeelementprostheseswithdifferenttypesofimplantabutmentjointsastraingaugecomparativeanalysis
AT abreucelinawanderley machinedandplasticcopingsinthreeelementprostheseswithdifferenttypesofimplantabutmentjointsastraingaugecomparativeanalysis
AT devasconcellosluisgustavooliveira machinedandplasticcopingsinthreeelementprostheseswithdifferenttypesofimplantabutmentjointsastraingaugecomparativeanalysis
AT balducciivan machinedandplasticcopingsinthreeelementprostheseswithdifferenttypesofimplantabutmentjointsastraingaugecomparativeanalysis