Cargando…

Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KIM, Sun-Jong, KIM, Myung-Rae, RIM, Jae-Suk, CHUNG, Sung-Min, SHIN, Sang-Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20835579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016
_version_ 1782514398402707456
author KIM, Sun-Jong
KIM, Myung-Rae
RIM, Jae-Suk
CHUNG, Sung-Min
SHIN, Sang-Wan
author_facet KIM, Sun-Jong
KIM, Myung-Rae
RIM, Jae-Suk
CHUNG, Sung-Min
SHIN, Sang-Wan
author_sort KIM, Sun-Jong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An Osstell™ resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53490752017-03-17 Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone KIM, Sun-Jong KIM, Myung-Rae RIM, Jae-Suk CHUNG, Sung-Min SHIN, Sang-Wan J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An Osstell™ resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC5349075/ /pubmed/20835579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
KIM, Sun-Jong
KIM, Myung-Rae
RIM, Jae-Suk
CHUNG, Sung-Min
SHIN, Sang-Wan
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_full Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_fullStr Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_short Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_sort comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20835579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsunjong comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone
AT kimmyungrae comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone
AT rimjaesuk comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone
AT chungsungmin comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone
AT shinsangwan comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone