Cargando…
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20835579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016 |
_version_ | 1782514398402707456 |
---|---|
author | KIM, Sun-Jong KIM, Myung-Rae RIM, Jae-Suk CHUNG, Sung-Min SHIN, Sang-Wan |
author_facet | KIM, Sun-Jong KIM, Myung-Rae RIM, Jae-Suk CHUNG, Sung-Min SHIN, Sang-Wan |
author_sort | KIM, Sun-Jong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An Osstell™ resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5349075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53490752017-03-17 Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone KIM, Sun-Jong KIM, Myung-Rae RIM, Jae-Suk CHUNG, Sung-Min SHIN, Sang-Wan J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An Osstell™ resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC5349075/ /pubmed/20835579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles KIM, Sun-Jong KIM, Myung-Rae RIM, Jae-Suk CHUNG, Sung-Min SHIN, Sang-Wan Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
title | Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface
treatments in dog bone |
title_full | Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface
treatments in dog bone |
title_fullStr | Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface
treatments in dog bone |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface
treatments in dog bone |
title_short | Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface
treatments in dog bone |
title_sort | comparison of implant stability after different implant surface
treatments in dog bone |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20835579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsunjong comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone AT kimmyungrae comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone AT rimjaesuk comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone AT chungsungmin comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone AT shinsangwan comparisonofimplantstabilityafterdifferentimplantsurfacetreatmentsindogbone |