Cargando…

A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has an unpredictable course and prognostic factors are incompletely understood. We aimed to identify prognostic factors, including multidimensional indices from a significant IPF cohort at the Bristol Interstitial Lung Disease Centre in the UK. Patients diagnosed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharp, Charles, Adamali, Huzaifa I., Millar, Ann B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00096-2016
_version_ 1782514404491788288
author Sharp, Charles
Adamali, Huzaifa I.
Millar, Ann B.
author_facet Sharp, Charles
Adamali, Huzaifa I.
Millar, Ann B.
author_sort Sharp, Charles
collection PubMed
description Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has an unpredictable course and prognostic factors are incompletely understood. We aimed to identify prognostic factors, including multidimensional indices from a significant IPF cohort at the Bristol Interstitial Lung Disease Centre in the UK. Patients diagnosed with IPF between 2007 and 2014 were identified. Longitudinal pulmonary physiology and exercise testing results were collated, with all-cause mortality used as the primary outcome. Factors influencing overall, 12- and 24-month survival were identified using Cox proportional hazards modelling and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We found in this real-world cohort of 167 patients, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)) and initiation of long-term oxygen were independent markers of poor prognosis. Exercise testing results predicted 12-month mortality as well as D(LCO), but did not perform as well for overall survival. The Composite Physiological Index was the best performing multidimensional index, but did not outperform D(LCO). Our data confirmed that patients who experienced a fall in forced vital capacity (FVC) >10% had significantly worse survival after that point (p=0.024). Our data from longitudinal follow-up in IPF show that D(LCO) is the best individual prognostic marker, outperforming FVC. Exercise testing is important in predicting early poor outcome. Regular and complete review should be conducted to ensure appropriate care is delivered in a timely fashion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53490962017-03-21 A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Sharp, Charles Adamali, Huzaifa I. Millar, Ann B. ERJ Open Res Original Articles Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has an unpredictable course and prognostic factors are incompletely understood. We aimed to identify prognostic factors, including multidimensional indices from a significant IPF cohort at the Bristol Interstitial Lung Disease Centre in the UK. Patients diagnosed with IPF between 2007 and 2014 were identified. Longitudinal pulmonary physiology and exercise testing results were collated, with all-cause mortality used as the primary outcome. Factors influencing overall, 12- and 24-month survival were identified using Cox proportional hazards modelling and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We found in this real-world cohort of 167 patients, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)) and initiation of long-term oxygen were independent markers of poor prognosis. Exercise testing results predicted 12-month mortality as well as D(LCO), but did not perform as well for overall survival. The Composite Physiological Index was the best performing multidimensional index, but did not outperform D(LCO). Our data confirmed that patients who experienced a fall in forced vital capacity (FVC) >10% had significantly worse survival after that point (p=0.024). Our data from longitudinal follow-up in IPF show that D(LCO) is the best individual prognostic marker, outperforming FVC. Exercise testing is important in predicting early poor outcome. Regular and complete review should be conducted to ensure appropriate care is delivered in a timely fashion. European Respiratory Society 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5349096/ /pubmed/28326312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00096-2016 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sharp, Charles
Adamali, Huzaifa I.
Millar, Ann B.
A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_full A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_fullStr A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_short A comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_sort comparison of published multidimensional indices to predict outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00096-2016
work_keys_str_mv AT sharpcharles acomparisonofpublishedmultidimensionalindicestopredictoutcomeinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT adamalihuzaifai acomparisonofpublishedmultidimensionalindicestopredictoutcomeinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT millarannb acomparisonofpublishedmultidimensionalindicestopredictoutcomeinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT sharpcharles comparisonofpublishedmultidimensionalindicestopredictoutcomeinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT adamalihuzaifai comparisonofpublishedmultidimensionalindicestopredictoutcomeinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT millarannb comparisonofpublishedmultidimensionalindicestopredictoutcomeinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis