Cargando…

Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish

Diadromy affords fish access to productive ecosystems, increasing growth and ultimately fitness, but it is unclear whether these advantages persist for species migrating within highly altered habitat. Here, we compared the foraging success of wild Delta Smelt—an endangered, zooplanktivorous, annual,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammock, Bruce G., Slater, Steven B., Baxter, Randall D., Fangue, Nann A., Cocherell, Dennis, Hennessy, April, Kurobe, Tomofumi, Tai, Christopher Y., Teh, Swee J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173497
_version_ 1782514517954002944
author Hammock, Bruce G.
Slater, Steven B.
Baxter, Randall D.
Fangue, Nann A.
Cocherell, Dennis
Hennessy, April
Kurobe, Tomofumi
Tai, Christopher Y.
Teh, Swee J.
author_facet Hammock, Bruce G.
Slater, Steven B.
Baxter, Randall D.
Fangue, Nann A.
Cocherell, Dennis
Hennessy, April
Kurobe, Tomofumi
Tai, Christopher Y.
Teh, Swee J.
author_sort Hammock, Bruce G.
collection PubMed
description Diadromy affords fish access to productive ecosystems, increasing growth and ultimately fitness, but it is unclear whether these advantages persist for species migrating within highly altered habitat. Here, we compared the foraging success of wild Delta Smelt—an endangered, zooplanktivorous, annual, semi-anadromous fish that is endemic to the highly altered San Francisco Estuary (SFE)—collected from freshwater (<0.55 psu) and brackish habitat (≥0.55 psu). Stomach fullness, averaged across three generations of wild Delta Smelt sampled from juvenile through adult life stages (n = 1,318), was 1.5-fold higher in brackish than in freshwater habitat. However, salinity and season interacted, with higher fullness (1.7-fold) in freshwater than in brackish habitat in summer, but far higher fullness in brackish than freshwater habitat during fall/winter and winter/spring (1.8 and 2.0-fold, respectively). To examine potential causes of this interaction we compared mesozooplankton abundance, collected concurrently with the Delta Smelt, in freshwater and brackish habitat during summer and fall/winter, and the metabolic rate of sub-adult Delta Smelt acclimated to salinities of 0.4, 2.0, and 12.0 psu in a laboratory experiment. A seasonal peak in mesozooplankton density coincided with the summer peak in Delta Smelt foraging success in freshwater, and a pronounced decline in freshwater mesozooplankton abundance in the fall coincided with declining stomach fullness, which persisted for the remainder of the year (fall, winter and spring). In brackish habitat, greater foraging ‘efficiency’ (prey items in stomachs/mesozooplankton abundance) led to more prey items per fish and generally higher stomach fullness (i.e., a higher proportion of mesozooplankton detected in concurrent trawls were eaten by fish in brackish habitat). Delta Smelt exhibited no difference in metabolic rate across the three salinities, indicating that metabolic responses to salinity are unlikely to have caused the stomach fullness results. Adult migration and freshwater spawning therefore places young fish in a position to exploit higher densities of prey in freshwater in the late spring/summer, and subsequent movement downstream provides older fish more accessible prey in brackish habitat. Thus, despite endemism to a highly-altered estuary, semi-anadromy provided substantial foraging benefits to Delta Smelt, consistent with other temperate migratory fish.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53496742017-04-06 Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish Hammock, Bruce G. Slater, Steven B. Baxter, Randall D. Fangue, Nann A. Cocherell, Dennis Hennessy, April Kurobe, Tomofumi Tai, Christopher Y. Teh, Swee J. PLoS One Research Article Diadromy affords fish access to productive ecosystems, increasing growth and ultimately fitness, but it is unclear whether these advantages persist for species migrating within highly altered habitat. Here, we compared the foraging success of wild Delta Smelt—an endangered, zooplanktivorous, annual, semi-anadromous fish that is endemic to the highly altered San Francisco Estuary (SFE)—collected from freshwater (<0.55 psu) and brackish habitat (≥0.55 psu). Stomach fullness, averaged across three generations of wild Delta Smelt sampled from juvenile through adult life stages (n = 1,318), was 1.5-fold higher in brackish than in freshwater habitat. However, salinity and season interacted, with higher fullness (1.7-fold) in freshwater than in brackish habitat in summer, but far higher fullness in brackish than freshwater habitat during fall/winter and winter/spring (1.8 and 2.0-fold, respectively). To examine potential causes of this interaction we compared mesozooplankton abundance, collected concurrently with the Delta Smelt, in freshwater and brackish habitat during summer and fall/winter, and the metabolic rate of sub-adult Delta Smelt acclimated to salinities of 0.4, 2.0, and 12.0 psu in a laboratory experiment. A seasonal peak in mesozooplankton density coincided with the summer peak in Delta Smelt foraging success in freshwater, and a pronounced decline in freshwater mesozooplankton abundance in the fall coincided with declining stomach fullness, which persisted for the remainder of the year (fall, winter and spring). In brackish habitat, greater foraging ‘efficiency’ (prey items in stomachs/mesozooplankton abundance) led to more prey items per fish and generally higher stomach fullness (i.e., a higher proportion of mesozooplankton detected in concurrent trawls were eaten by fish in brackish habitat). Delta Smelt exhibited no difference in metabolic rate across the three salinities, indicating that metabolic responses to salinity are unlikely to have caused the stomach fullness results. Adult migration and freshwater spawning therefore places young fish in a position to exploit higher densities of prey in freshwater in the late spring/summer, and subsequent movement downstream provides older fish more accessible prey in brackish habitat. Thus, despite endemism to a highly-altered estuary, semi-anadromy provided substantial foraging benefits to Delta Smelt, consistent with other temperate migratory fish. Public Library of Science 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5349674/ /pubmed/28291808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173497 Text en © 2017 Hammock et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hammock, Bruce G.
Slater, Steven B.
Baxter, Randall D.
Fangue, Nann A.
Cocherell, Dennis
Hennessy, April
Kurobe, Tomofumi
Tai, Christopher Y.
Teh, Swee J.
Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
title Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
title_full Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
title_fullStr Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
title_full_unstemmed Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
title_short Foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
title_sort foraging and metabolic consequences of semi-anadromy for an endangered estuarine fish
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173497
work_keys_str_mv AT hammockbruceg foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT slaterstevenb foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT baxterrandalld foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT fanguenanna foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT cocherelldennis foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT hennessyapril foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT kurobetomofumi foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT taichristophery foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish
AT tehsweej foragingandmetabolicconsequencesofsemianadromyforanendangeredestuarinefish