Cargando…
Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876 |
_version_ | 1782514518567419904 |
---|---|
author | Renwick, Anna R. Robinson, Catherine J. Garnett, Stephen T. Leiper, Ian Possingham, Hugh P. Carwardine, Josie |
author_facet | Renwick, Anna R. Robinson, Catherine J. Garnett, Stephen T. Leiper, Ian Possingham, Hugh P. Carwardine, Josie |
author_sort | Renwick, Anna R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia’s 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5349676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53496762017-04-06 Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study Renwick, Anna R. Robinson, Catherine J. Garnett, Stephen T. Leiper, Ian Possingham, Hugh P. Carwardine, Josie PLoS One Research Article Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia’s 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so. Public Library of Science 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5349676/ /pubmed/28291797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876 Text en © 2017 Renwick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Renwick, Anna R. Robinson, Catherine J. Garnett, Stephen T. Leiper, Ian Possingham, Hugh P. Carwardine, Josie Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study |
title | Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study |
title_full | Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study |
title_fullStr | Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study |
title_full_unstemmed | Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study |
title_short | Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study |
title_sort | mapping indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: an australian case-study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renwickannar mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy AT robinsoncatherinej mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy AT garnettstephent mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy AT leiperian mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy AT possinghamhughp mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy AT carwardinejosie mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy |