Cargando…

Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study

Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renwick, Anna R., Robinson, Catherine J., Garnett, Stephen T., Leiper, Ian, Possingham, Hugh P., Carwardine, Josie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876
_version_ 1782514518567419904
author Renwick, Anna R.
Robinson, Catherine J.
Garnett, Stephen T.
Leiper, Ian
Possingham, Hugh P.
Carwardine, Josie
author_facet Renwick, Anna R.
Robinson, Catherine J.
Garnett, Stephen T.
Leiper, Ian
Possingham, Hugh P.
Carwardine, Josie
author_sort Renwick, Anna R.
collection PubMed
description Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia’s 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53496762017-04-06 Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study Renwick, Anna R. Robinson, Catherine J. Garnett, Stephen T. Leiper, Ian Possingham, Hugh P. Carwardine, Josie PLoS One Research Article Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia’s 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so. Public Library of Science 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5349676/ /pubmed/28291797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876 Text en © 2017 Renwick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Renwick, Anna R.
Robinson, Catherine J.
Garnett, Stephen T.
Leiper, Ian
Possingham, Hugh P.
Carwardine, Josie
Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
title Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
title_full Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
title_fullStr Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
title_short Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study
title_sort mapping indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: an australian case-study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876
work_keys_str_mv AT renwickannar mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy
AT robinsoncatherinej mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy
AT garnettstephent mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy
AT leiperian mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy
AT possinghamhughp mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy
AT carwardinejosie mappingindigenouslandmanagementforthreatenedspeciesconservationanaustraliancasestudy