Cargando…

Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda

Faculty development for the evaluation process serves two distinct goals. The first goal is to improve the quality of the evaluations submitted by the faculty. Providing an accurate assessment of a learner’s capabilities is a skill and, similar to other skills, can be developed with training. Frame-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oller, Kellee L, Mai, Cuc T, Ledford, Robert J, O’Brien, Kevin E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331382
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S124004
_version_ 1782514526126604288
author Oller, Kellee L
Mai, Cuc T
Ledford, Robert J
O’Brien, Kevin E
author_facet Oller, Kellee L
Mai, Cuc T
Ledford, Robert J
O’Brien, Kevin E
author_sort Oller, Kellee L
collection PubMed
description Faculty development for the evaluation process serves two distinct goals. The first goal is to improve the quality of the evaluations submitted by the faculty. Providing an accurate assessment of a learner’s capabilities is a skill and, similar to other skills, can be developed with training. Frame-of-reference training serves to calibrate the faculty’s standard of performance and build a uniform language of the evaluation. Second, areas for faculty professional growth can be identified from data generated from learners’ evaluations of the faculty using narrative comments, item-level comparison reports, and comparative rank list information. This paper presents an innovative model, grounded in institutional experience and review of the literature, to provide feedback to faculty evaluators, thereby improving the reliability of the evaluation process, and motivating the professional growth of faculty as educators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53497002017-03-22 Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda Oller, Kellee L Mai, Cuc T Ledford, Robert J O’Brien, Kevin E Adv Med Educ Pract Expert Opinion Faculty development for the evaluation process serves two distinct goals. The first goal is to improve the quality of the evaluations submitted by the faculty. Providing an accurate assessment of a learner’s capabilities is a skill and, similar to other skills, can be developed with training. Frame-of-reference training serves to calibrate the faculty’s standard of performance and build a uniform language of the evaluation. Second, areas for faculty professional growth can be identified from data generated from learners’ evaluations of the faculty using narrative comments, item-level comparison reports, and comparative rank list information. This paper presents an innovative model, grounded in institutional experience and review of the literature, to provide feedback to faculty evaluators, thereby improving the reliability of the evaluation process, and motivating the professional growth of faculty as educators. Dove Medical Press 2017-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5349700/ /pubmed/28331382 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S124004 Text en © 2017 Oller et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Expert Opinion
Oller, Kellee L
Mai, Cuc T
Ledford, Robert J
O’Brien, Kevin E
Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
title Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
title_full Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
title_fullStr Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
title_full_unstemmed Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
title_short Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
title_sort faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda
topic Expert Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331382
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S124004
work_keys_str_mv AT ollerkelleel facultydevelopmentfortheevaluationsystemadualagenda
AT maicuct facultydevelopmentfortheevaluationsystemadualagenda
AT ledfordrobertj facultydevelopmentfortheevaluationsystemadualagenda
AT obrienkevine facultydevelopmentfortheevaluationsystemadualagenda