Cargando…
Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day
BACKGROUND: The inhaled corticoteroid (ICS) ciclesonide (Cic), controls asthma symptoms in the majority of patients at the recommended dose of 160 µg/day. However, the relationship between the level of asthma control and increasing doses of Cic is unknown. This study investigated whether long-term t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S111712 |
_version_ | 1782514526994825216 |
---|---|
author | Pedersen, Søren E Prasad, Niyati Goehring, Udo-Michael Andersson, Henrik Postma, Dirkje S |
author_facet | Pedersen, Søren E Prasad, Niyati Goehring, Udo-Michael Andersson, Henrik Postma, Dirkje S |
author_sort | Pedersen, Søren E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The inhaled corticoteroid (ICS) ciclesonide (Cic), controls asthma symptoms in the majority of patients at the recommended dose of 160 µg/day. However, the relationship between the level of asthma control and increasing doses of Cic is unknown. This study investigated whether long-term treatment with higher doses of Cic would further improve asthma symptoms in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 367 patients were allocated to one of three treatment arms (Cic 160, 320 and 640 µg/day). After a single-blind, 3-week baseline period with Cic 160 µg/day, eligible patients were randomized to receive 52 weeks of treatment with Cic 160, 320 or 640 µg/day (double-blind period) during which forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), exacerbations and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores were measured. RESULTS: Treatment with all the three doses was associated with significant improvements in ACQ scores, FEV(1) and asthma symptoms (P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the three doses. The results of the primary end point analysis showed a numerical improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day (least square [LS] mean: −0.122; two-sided P-value: 0.30). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that the improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day was statistically significant in subjects who experience at least one exacerbation per year (LS mean: −0.586; 95% confidence interval: −1.110, −0.062, P=0.0285). Adverse events were low and consistent with the known safety profile of Cic. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent, uncontrolled asthma, increasing the Cic dose from 160 to 640 µg/day provided no clear additional effect. Patients who experience more than one exacerbation per year may benefit from higher doses; however, further studies are necessary to confirm this. All Cic doses were well tolerated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5349703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53497032017-03-22 Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day Pedersen, Søren E Prasad, Niyati Goehring, Udo-Michael Andersson, Henrik Postma, Dirkje S J Asthma Allergy Original Research BACKGROUND: The inhaled corticoteroid (ICS) ciclesonide (Cic), controls asthma symptoms in the majority of patients at the recommended dose of 160 µg/day. However, the relationship between the level of asthma control and increasing doses of Cic is unknown. This study investigated whether long-term treatment with higher doses of Cic would further improve asthma symptoms in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 367 patients were allocated to one of three treatment arms (Cic 160, 320 and 640 µg/day). After a single-blind, 3-week baseline period with Cic 160 µg/day, eligible patients were randomized to receive 52 weeks of treatment with Cic 160, 320 or 640 µg/day (double-blind period) during which forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), exacerbations and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores were measured. RESULTS: Treatment with all the three doses was associated with significant improvements in ACQ scores, FEV(1) and asthma symptoms (P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the three doses. The results of the primary end point analysis showed a numerical improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day (least square [LS] mean: −0.122; two-sided P-value: 0.30). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that the improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day was statistically significant in subjects who experience at least one exacerbation per year (LS mean: −0.586; 95% confidence interval: −1.110, −0.062, P=0.0285). Adverse events were low and consistent with the known safety profile of Cic. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent, uncontrolled asthma, increasing the Cic dose from 160 to 640 µg/day provided no clear additional effect. Patients who experience more than one exacerbation per year may benefit from higher doses; however, further studies are necessary to confirm this. All Cic doses were well tolerated. Dove Medical Press 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5349703/ /pubmed/28331346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S111712 Text en © 2017 Pedersen et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pedersen, Søren E Prasad, Niyati Goehring, Udo-Michael Andersson, Henrik Postma, Dirkje S Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
title | Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
title_full | Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
title_fullStr | Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
title_full_unstemmed | Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
title_short | Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
title_sort | control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 μg/day |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S111712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedersensørene controlofmoderatetosevereasthmawithrandomizedciclesonidedosesof160320and640mgday AT prasadniyati controlofmoderatetosevereasthmawithrandomizedciclesonidedosesof160320and640mgday AT goehringudomichael controlofmoderatetosevereasthmawithrandomizedciclesonidedosesof160320and640mgday AT anderssonhenrik controlofmoderatetosevereasthmawithrandomizedciclesonidedosesof160320and640mgday AT postmadirkjes controlofmoderatetosevereasthmawithrandomizedciclesonidedosesof160320and640mgday |