Cargando…

Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of neutral sodium fluoride (NNaF) gel and acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel on the surface roughness of colored compomer (Twinky Star), conventional compomer (Compoglass F) and resin-modified glassionomer cement (RMGIC) (Photac-Fil)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AVŞAR, Aysun, TULOGLU, Nuray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20485929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200012
_version_ 1782514531204857856
author AVŞAR, Aysun
TULOGLU, Nuray
author_facet AVŞAR, Aysun
TULOGLU, Nuray
author_sort AVŞAR, Aysun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of neutral sodium fluoride (NNaF) gel and acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel on the surface roughness of colored compomer (Twinky Star), conventional compomer (Compoglass F) and resin-modified glassionomer cement (RMGIC) (Photac-Fil). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 standardized disc-shaped specimens were prepared for each material. After 24 h, finishing and polishing of specimens were done with aluminum oxide disc. Surface treatments with topical fluoride agents or distilled water (control) were performed four times, and interspersed with 8 pH cycles, simulating high cariogenic challenges. After the treatment, the surface roughness (Ra) was determined using a profilometer. In each group, specimens with Ra closest to the mean were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at ×1,000 and ×3,500 magnifications. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate Ra measurements, and the differences in Ra values between subgroups for each material and each topical applications were compared by Tukey’s highly significant difference pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in Ra between the Twinky Star and Compoglass F was found. However, Photac Fil showed significantly higher Ra than these materials after all surface treatments. There was a general trend of Ra increase from controls to NNaF and APF gels for all materials. SEM observations revealed that the surface micromorphology of Twinky-Star did not differ significantly from that of Compoglass F. CONCLUSION: Both the compomers and the RMGIC showed significantly higher surface roughness when subjected to APF gel application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53497542017-03-17 Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer AVŞAR, Aysun TULOGLU, Nuray J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of neutral sodium fluoride (NNaF) gel and acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel on the surface roughness of colored compomer (Twinky Star), conventional compomer (Compoglass F) and resin-modified glassionomer cement (RMGIC) (Photac-Fil). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 standardized disc-shaped specimens were prepared for each material. After 24 h, finishing and polishing of specimens were done with aluminum oxide disc. Surface treatments with topical fluoride agents or distilled water (control) were performed four times, and interspersed with 8 pH cycles, simulating high cariogenic challenges. After the treatment, the surface roughness (Ra) was determined using a profilometer. In each group, specimens with Ra closest to the mean were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at ×1,000 and ×3,500 magnifications. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate Ra measurements, and the differences in Ra values between subgroups for each material and each topical applications were compared by Tukey’s highly significant difference pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in Ra between the Twinky Star and Compoglass F was found. However, Photac Fil showed significantly higher Ra than these materials after all surface treatments. There was a general trend of Ra increase from controls to NNaF and APF gels for all materials. SEM observations revealed that the surface micromorphology of Twinky-Star did not differ significantly from that of Compoglass F. CONCLUSION: Both the compomers and the RMGIC showed significantly higher surface roughness when subjected to APF gel application. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC5349754/ /pubmed/20485929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200012 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
AVŞAR, Aysun
TULOGLU, Nuray
Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
title Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
title_full Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
title_fullStr Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
title_short Effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
title_sort effect of different topical fluoride applications on the surface roughness of a colored compomer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20485929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200012
work_keys_str_mv AT avsaraysun effectofdifferenttopicalfluorideapplicationsonthesurfaceroughnessofacoloredcompomer
AT tuloglunuray effectofdifferenttopicalfluorideapplicationsonthesurfaceroughnessofacoloredcompomer