Cargando…

Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: NACONECY, Marcos Michelon, GEREMIA, Tomás, CERVIERI, André, TEIXEIRA, Eduardo Rolim, SHINKAI, Rosemary Sadami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20485930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013
_version_ 1782514531443933184
author NACONECY, Marcos Michelon
GEREMIA, Tomás
CERVIERI, André
TEIXEIRA, Eduardo Rolim
SHINKAI, Rosemary Sadami
author_facet NACONECY, Marcos Michelon
GEREMIA, Tomás
CERVIERI, André
TEIXEIRA, Eduardo Rolim
SHINKAI, Rosemary Sadami
author_sort NACONECY, Marcos Michelon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5349755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53497552017-03-17 Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants NACONECY, Marcos Michelon GEREMIA, Tomás CERVIERI, André TEIXEIRA, Eduardo Rolim SHINKAI, Rosemary Sadami J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bending moments, and compressive and tensile forces in implant-supported prostheses with three, four or five abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten Pd-Ag frameworks were tested over two master models with: 1) parallel vertical implants, and 2) tilted distal implants. Strain gauges were fixed on the abutments of each master model to measure the deformation when a static load of 50 N was applied on the cantilever (15 mm). The deformation values were measured when the metallic frameworks were tested over three, four or five abutments, and transformed into force and bending moment values. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: Abutment #1 (adjacent to the cantilever) had the highest values of force and sagittal bending moment for all tests with three, four or five abutments. Independently from the number of abutments, axial force in abutment #1 was higher in the vertical model than in the tilted model. Total moment was higher with three abutments than with four or five abutments. Independently from the inclination of implants, the mean force with four or five abutments was lower than that with three abutments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that in the set-ups with four or five abutments tilted distal implants reduced axial force and did not increase bending moments. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC5349755/ /pubmed/20485930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
NACONECY, Marcos Michelon
GEREMIA, Tomás
CERVIERI, André
TEIXEIRA, Eduardo Rolim
SHINKAI, Rosemary Sadami
Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_full Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_fullStr Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_short Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
title_sort effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5349755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20485930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000200013
work_keys_str_mv AT naconecymarcosmichelon effectofthenumberofabutmentsonbiomechanicsofbranemarkprosthesiswithstraightandtilteddistalimplants
AT geremiatomas effectofthenumberofabutmentsonbiomechanicsofbranemarkprosthesiswithstraightandtilteddistalimplants
AT cervieriandre effectofthenumberofabutmentsonbiomechanicsofbranemarkprosthesiswithstraightandtilteddistalimplants
AT teixeiraeduardorolim effectofthenumberofabutmentsonbiomechanicsofbranemarkprosthesiswithstraightandtilteddistalimplants
AT shinkairosemarysadami effectofthenumberofabutmentsonbiomechanicsofbranemarkprosthesiswithstraightandtilteddistalimplants