Cargando…

Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to discuss methods used to analyze health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for decision analytic models. The analysis presented in this paper was used to provide HRQoL data for the ivabradine health technology asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffiths, Alison, Paracha, Noman, Davies, Andrew, Branscombe, Neil, Cowie, Martin R., Sculpher, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5350196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0471-x
_version_ 1782514612552335360
author Griffiths, Alison
Paracha, Noman
Davies, Andrew
Branscombe, Neil
Cowie, Martin R.
Sculpher, Mark
author_facet Griffiths, Alison
Paracha, Noman
Davies, Andrew
Branscombe, Neil
Cowie, Martin R.
Sculpher, Mark
author_sort Griffiths, Alison
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to discuss methods used to analyze health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for decision analytic models. The analysis presented in this paper was used to provide HRQoL data for the ivabradine health technology assessment (HTA) submission in chronic heart failure. METHODS: We have used a large, longitudinal EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) dataset from the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the I(f) Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT) (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02441218) to illustrate issues and methods. HRQoL weights (utility values) were estimated from a mixed regression model developed using SHIFT EQ-5D data (n = 5313 patients). The regression model was used to predict HRQoL outcomes according to treatment, patient characteristics, and key clinical outcomes for patients with a heart rate ≥75 bpm. RESULTS: Ivabradine was associated with an HRQoL weight gain of 0.01. HRQoL weights differed according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (NYHA I–IV, no hospitalization: standard care 0.82–0.46; ivabradine 0.84–0.47). A reduction in HRQoL weight was associated with hospitalizations within 30 days of an HRQoL assessment visit, with this reduction varying by NYHA class [−0.07 (NYHA I) to −0.21 (NYHA IV)]. CONCLUSION: The mixed model explained variation in EQ-5D data according to key clinical outcomes and patient characteristics, providing essential information for long-term predictions of patient HRQoL in the cost-effectiveness model. This model was also used to estimate the loss in HRQoL associated with hospitalizations. In SHIFT many hospitalizations did not occur close to EQ-5D visits; hence, any temporary changes in HRQoL associated with such events would not be captured fully in observed RCT evidence, but could be predicted in our cost-effectiveness analysis using the mixed model. Given the large reduction in hospitalizations associated with ivabradine this was an important feature of the analysis. Funding: The Servier Research Group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5350196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53501962017-03-27 Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial Griffiths, Alison Paracha, Noman Davies, Andrew Branscombe, Neil Cowie, Martin R. Sculpher, Mark Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to discuss methods used to analyze health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for decision analytic models. The analysis presented in this paper was used to provide HRQoL data for the ivabradine health technology assessment (HTA) submission in chronic heart failure. METHODS: We have used a large, longitudinal EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) dataset from the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the I(f) Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT) (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02441218) to illustrate issues and methods. HRQoL weights (utility values) were estimated from a mixed regression model developed using SHIFT EQ-5D data (n = 5313 patients). The regression model was used to predict HRQoL outcomes according to treatment, patient characteristics, and key clinical outcomes for patients with a heart rate ≥75 bpm. RESULTS: Ivabradine was associated with an HRQoL weight gain of 0.01. HRQoL weights differed according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (NYHA I–IV, no hospitalization: standard care 0.82–0.46; ivabradine 0.84–0.47). A reduction in HRQoL weight was associated with hospitalizations within 30 days of an HRQoL assessment visit, with this reduction varying by NYHA class [−0.07 (NYHA I) to −0.21 (NYHA IV)]. CONCLUSION: The mixed model explained variation in EQ-5D data according to key clinical outcomes and patient characteristics, providing essential information for long-term predictions of patient HRQoL in the cost-effectiveness model. This model was also used to estimate the loss in HRQoL associated with hospitalizations. In SHIFT many hospitalizations did not occur close to EQ-5D visits; hence, any temporary changes in HRQoL associated with such events would not be captured fully in observed RCT evidence, but could be predicted in our cost-effectiveness analysis using the mixed model. Given the large reduction in hospitalizations associated with ivabradine this was an important feature of the analysis. Funding: The Servier Research Group. Springer Healthcare 2017-02-15 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5350196/ /pubmed/28205056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0471-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Griffiths, Alison
Paracha, Noman
Davies, Andrew
Branscombe, Neil
Cowie, Martin R.
Sculpher, Mark
Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial
title Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life Data to Estimate Parameters for Cost-Effectiveness Models: An Example Using Longitudinal EQ-5D Data from the SHIFT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort analyzing health-related quality of life data to estimate parameters for cost-effectiveness models: an example using longitudinal eq-5d data from the shift randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5350196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0471-x
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithsalison analyzinghealthrelatedqualityoflifedatatoestimateparametersforcosteffectivenessmodelsanexampleusinglongitudinaleq5ddatafromtheshiftrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parachanoman analyzinghealthrelatedqualityoflifedatatoestimateparametersforcosteffectivenessmodelsanexampleusinglongitudinaleq5ddatafromtheshiftrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT daviesandrew analyzinghealthrelatedqualityoflifedatatoestimateparametersforcosteffectivenessmodelsanexampleusinglongitudinaleq5ddatafromtheshiftrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT branscombeneil analyzinghealthrelatedqualityoflifedatatoestimateparametersforcosteffectivenessmodelsanexampleusinglongitudinaleq5ddatafromtheshiftrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cowiemartinr analyzinghealthrelatedqualityoflifedatatoestimateparametersforcosteffectivenessmodelsanexampleusinglongitudinaleq5ddatafromtheshiftrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sculphermark analyzinghealthrelatedqualityoflifedatatoestimateparametersforcosteffectivenessmodelsanexampleusinglongitudinaleq5ddatafromtheshiftrandomizedcontrolledtrial