Cargando…

The effect of slow release insemination on pregnancy rates: report of two randomized controlled pilot studies and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: A modified application technique of intrauterine insemination (IUI) is slow release insemination (SRI), first described by Muharib et al. (Hum Reprod 7(2):227–229, 1992), who postulated higher pregnancy rates with a slow release of spermatozoa for 3 h. METHODS: To investigate this approach,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marschalek, Julian, Franz, Maximilian, Gonen, Yael, Kruessel, Jan-Steffen, Weichselbaum, Amnon, Kuessel, Lorenz, Trofaier, Marie-Louise, Ott, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5350232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4290-3
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: A modified application technique of intrauterine insemination (IUI) is slow release insemination (SRI), first described by Muharib et al. (Hum Reprod 7(2):227–229, 1992), who postulated higher pregnancy rates with a slow release of spermatozoa for 3 h. METHODS: To investigate this approach, two randomized controlled, cross-over pilot studies were performed from 2004 to 2006 in Israel and Germany to compare SRI with the standard bolus IUI. We aimed to present the results and perform a meta-analysis on available data for SRI. Univariate comparisons of pregnancy rates were performed using one-tailed z tests for method superiority. For meta-analysis, a fixed-effect Mantel–Haentzel weighted average of relative risk was performed. RESULTS: Fifty treatment cycles (IUI: n = 25, SRI: n = 25) were performed in Germany, achieving four pregnancies (IUI: 4%, SRI: 12%, p > 0.05). Thirty-nine treatment cycles (IUI: n = 19, SRI: n = 20) were performed in Israel achieving six pregnancies (IUI: 10.5%, SRI: 20%; p > 0.05). Meta-analysis of all eligible studies for SRI (n = 3) revealed a combined relative risk for pregnancy after SRI of 2.64 (95% CI 1.04–6.74), p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, these results lend support to the hypothesis that the pregnancy rate might be improved by SRI compared to the standard bolus technique.