Cargando…

Randomized Clinical Trial of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite for Class I Restorations: 2-Year Results

Objectives. To compare the clinical performances of a self-adhering resin composite and a conventional flowable composite with a self-etch bonding system on permanent molars. The influence of using rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation was also investigated. Materials and Methods. Patients aged be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sabbagh, J., Dagher, S., El Osta, N., Souhaid, P.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Hindawi 2017
Materias:	Clinical Study
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5350491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5041529

Ejemplares similares

Clinical evaluation of self-adhering flowable composite versus conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities: Randomized controlled trial
por: Shaalan, Omar Osama, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite with conventional flowable composite in Class I cavity: An in vivo study
por: Kalola, Ashwini V, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of self-adhering flowable composite microleakage with several types of bonding agent in class V cavity restoration
por: Jordehi, Atefeh Yousefi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite as occlusal restorative material in primary molars: one-year results
por: Serin, Buse Ayse, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Management of Class I and Class II Amalgam Restorations with Localized Defects: Five-Year Results
por: Martin, Javier, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Microleakage of Flowable Composite Restorations
por: Ballal, Vasudev
Publicado: (2010)

An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials
por: Sadeghi, Mostafa
Publicado: (2012)

A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
por: Shaalan, Omar Osama, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Marginal microleakage of flowable resin composites used to adhere Semi-Direct restorations
por: de Sousa Correia, Inês, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Restoring with flowables /
por: Terry, Douglas A
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of marginal sealing ability of self-adhesive flowable composite resin in Class II composite restoration: An in vitro study
por: Mishra, Preeti, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical Evaluation of Flowable Composite Materials in Permanent Molars Small Class I Restorations: 3-Year Double Blind Clinical Study
por: Dukić, Walter, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Oz, Fatma Dilsad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effect of a new-generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in Class V composite restorations as an intermediate layer
por: Arslan, Soley, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Clinical performance of Class I nanohybrid composite restorations with resin-modified glass-ionomer liner and flowable composite liner: A randomized clinical trial
por: Suhasini, Krishtipati, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Surface Micro-Hardness and Wear Resistance of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in Comparison to Conventional Flowable Composites
por: Azizi, Fateme, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Flowable Bulk-Fill Materials Compared to Nano Ceramic Composites for Class I Cavities Restorations in Primary Molars: A Two-Year Prospective Case-Control Study
por: Sarapultseva, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites following various restorative techniques in Class V lesions: An in vitro study
por: Kumar, Ashina Anil, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
por: Abu Haimed, Tariq, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composite
por: Sibai, Norah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities
por: Hasani, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study
por: Sengar, Ekta Varma, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth
por: Rahimian-Imam, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite
por: Hamdy, Tamer M.
Publicado: (2018)

Toothbrush Abrasion of Restorations Fabricated with Flowable Resin Composites with Different Viscosities In Vitro
por: Miyano, Yuko, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers
por: Majety, Kishore Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Primary Dentin
por: Poorzandpoush, Kiana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Effect of Energy Densities on the Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite to Er:YAG Pretreated Dentin
por: Nahas, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and nanoleakage of conventional and self-adhering flowable composites to primary teeth dentin
por: Sachdeva, Priyanka, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparative evaluation of bond strength of self-adhering flowable composites to the dentin prepared with different burs: An in vitro study
por: Rangappa, Anithakumari, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant and Self-adhering Flowable Composite: An In Vivo Study
por: Wadhwa, Saakshe, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Overviews on the Progress of Flowable Dental Polymeric Composites: Their Composition, Polymerization Process, Flowability and Radiopacity Aspects
por: Vouvoudi, Evangelia C.
Publicado: (2022)

Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage?
por: Naga, Abeer Abo El, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparing the reinforcing effects of a resin modified glassionomer cement, Flowable compomer, and Flowable composite in the restoration of calcium hydroxide-treated immature roots in vitro
por: Prathibha, Rani S
Publicado: (2011)

Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Self-adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in 6–9-year-old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Bhuvaneswari, Paliki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer to Two Pulp Capping Materials
por: Doozaneh, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Resin Liner: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
por: Gayatri, Chava, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Properties evaluation of silorane, low-shrinkage, non-flowable and flowable resin-based composites in dentistry
por: Maia, Rodrigo R., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A laboratory pilot study on voids in flowable bulk-fill composite restorations in bovine Class-II and endodontic access cavities after sonic vibration
por: Körner, Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Tensile Bond Strength and Marginal Integrity of a Self-adhering and a Self-etch Adhesive Flowable Composite after Artificial Thermomechanical Aging
por: Kamatchi, Mohanraj, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_km9ioq35k4ju79mnrhdbl4jd90