Cargando…

Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been increasingly practiced on gastric cancer (GC), and histological evaluation to predict outcome is urgent in clinical practice. There are five classic tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, including Mandard-TRG system, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Associa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Yuelu, Sun, Yongkun, Hu, Shangying, Jiang, Yong, Yue, Jiangying, Xue, Xuemin, Yang, Lin, Xue, Liyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28292272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0598-5
_version_ 1782514732920471552
author Zhu, Yuelu
Sun, Yongkun
Hu, Shangying
Jiang, Yong
Yue, Jiangying
Xue, Xuemin
Yang, Lin
Xue, Liyan
author_facet Zhu, Yuelu
Sun, Yongkun
Hu, Shangying
Jiang, Yong
Yue, Jiangying
Xue, Xuemin
Yang, Lin
Xue, Liyan
author_sort Zhu, Yuelu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been increasingly practiced on gastric cancer (GC), and histological evaluation to predict outcome is urgent in clinical practice. There are five classic tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, including Mandard-TRG system, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA)-TRG system, College of American Pathologists (CAP)-TRG system, China-TRG system and Becker-TRG system. METHODS: Totally, 192 patients of gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were evaluated using the above five TRG systems. The clinicopathological characteristics were also assessed. The correlation among TRG systems, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: All the five TRG systems were significantly correlated with differentiation, postsurgical T category, postsurgical N category, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, lymph-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, as well as tumor size. All the five TRG systems were statistically significant in univariate Cox survival analysis. However, only postsurgical T category, postsurgical N category and R0 resection were independent in multivariate Cox survival analysis. The tight correlation between the TRG systems and other characteristics such as postsurgical stage might affect the independent prognostic role of the TRG systems. As compared with other TRG systems, the hazard ratio of no/slightly response in both Mandard TRG system and JGCA TRG system revealed higher hazard of death and disease progression than that of severe response when using univariate Cox survival analysis. The median survival time of complete response and nearly complete response were much longer than that of partial response, all classified by Mandard-TRG system. This could help clinicians predict prognosis more reasonably than JGCA-TRG which does not have the category of nearly complete response. CONCLUSION: We recommend Mandard-TRG system for GC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to its better prediction of prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5351213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53512132017-03-17 Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China Zhu, Yuelu Sun, Yongkun Hu, Shangying Jiang, Yong Yue, Jiangying Xue, Xuemin Yang, Lin Xue, Liyan BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been increasingly practiced on gastric cancer (GC), and histological evaluation to predict outcome is urgent in clinical practice. There are five classic tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, including Mandard-TRG system, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA)-TRG system, College of American Pathologists (CAP)-TRG system, China-TRG system and Becker-TRG system. METHODS: Totally, 192 patients of gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were evaluated using the above five TRG systems. The clinicopathological characteristics were also assessed. The correlation among TRG systems, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: All the five TRG systems were significantly correlated with differentiation, postsurgical T category, postsurgical N category, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, lymph-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, as well as tumor size. All the five TRG systems were statistically significant in univariate Cox survival analysis. However, only postsurgical T category, postsurgical N category and R0 resection were independent in multivariate Cox survival analysis. The tight correlation between the TRG systems and other characteristics such as postsurgical stage might affect the independent prognostic role of the TRG systems. As compared with other TRG systems, the hazard ratio of no/slightly response in both Mandard TRG system and JGCA TRG system revealed higher hazard of death and disease progression than that of severe response when using univariate Cox survival analysis. The median survival time of complete response and nearly complete response were much longer than that of partial response, all classified by Mandard-TRG system. This could help clinicians predict prognosis more reasonably than JGCA-TRG which does not have the category of nearly complete response. CONCLUSION: We recommend Mandard-TRG system for GC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to its better prediction of prognosis. BioMed Central 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5351213/ /pubmed/28292272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0598-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Yuelu
Sun, Yongkun
Hu, Shangying
Jiang, Yong
Yue, Jiangying
Xue, Xuemin
Yang, Lin
Xue, Liyan
Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China
title Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China
title_full Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China
title_fullStr Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China
title_short Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China
title_sort comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from national cancer center in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28292272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0598-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyuelu comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT sunyongkun comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT hushangying comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT jiangyong comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT yuejiangying comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT xuexuemin comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT yanglin comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina
AT xueliyan comparisonoffivetumorregressiongradingsystemsforgastricadenocarcinomaafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyaretrospectivestudyof192casesfromnationalcancercenterinchina