Cargando…
Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for detection and measurement of gastric cancer (GC). However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in gastric cancer still remains unclear. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies comprising 1193 GC patients met our inclusion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009985 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14064 |
_version_ | 1782514798752169984 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Yunhe Zhang, Kecheng Xi, Hongqing Cai, Aizhen Wu, Xiaosong Cui, Jianxin Li, Jiyang Qiao, Zhi Wei, Bo Chen, Lin |
author_facet | Gao, Yunhe Zhang, Kecheng Xi, Hongqing Cai, Aizhen Wu, Xiaosong Cui, Jianxin Li, Jiyang Qiao, Zhi Wei, Bo Chen, Lin |
author_sort | Gao, Yunhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for detection and measurement of gastric cancer (GC). However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in gastric cancer still remains unclear. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies comprising 1193 GC patients met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59−0.65) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), respectively. The AUSROC (area under SROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.98). The results showed that the presence of certain ctDNA markers was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.61, p = 0.002), TNM stage (I + II/III + IV, OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.07−0.17, p = 0.000), as well as H. pylori infection. (H.p negative/H.p positive, OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.91, p = 0.018). Moreover, there was also a significant association between the presence of ctDNA and worse overall survival (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38−2.28, p < 0.001), as well as disease-free survival (HR 4.36, 95% CI 3.08−6.16, p < 0.001). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relating literature published up until November 30, 2016. Diagnostic accuracy variables were pooled by the Meta-Disc software. Engauge Digitizer and Stata software were applied for prognostic data extraction and analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates the detection of certain ctDNA targets is significantly associated with poor prognosis of GC patients, with high specificity and relatively moderate sensitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5351635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53516352017-04-13 Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis Gao, Yunhe Zhang, Kecheng Xi, Hongqing Cai, Aizhen Wu, Xiaosong Cui, Jianxin Li, Jiyang Qiao, Zhi Wei, Bo Chen, Lin Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for detection and measurement of gastric cancer (GC). However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in gastric cancer still remains unclear. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies comprising 1193 GC patients met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59−0.65) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), respectively. The AUSROC (area under SROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.98). The results showed that the presence of certain ctDNA markers was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.61, p = 0.002), TNM stage (I + II/III + IV, OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.07−0.17, p = 0.000), as well as H. pylori infection. (H.p negative/H.p positive, OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.91, p = 0.018). Moreover, there was also a significant association between the presence of ctDNA and worse overall survival (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38−2.28, p < 0.001), as well as disease-free survival (HR 4.36, 95% CI 3.08−6.16, p < 0.001). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relating literature published up until November 30, 2016. Diagnostic accuracy variables were pooled by the Meta-Disc software. Engauge Digitizer and Stata software were applied for prognostic data extraction and analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates the detection of certain ctDNA targets is significantly associated with poor prognosis of GC patients, with high specificity and relatively moderate sensitivity. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5351635/ /pubmed/28009985 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14064 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Gao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Gao, Yunhe Zhang, Kecheng Xi, Hongqing Cai, Aizhen Wu, Xiaosong Cui, Jianxin Li, Jiyang Qiao, Zhi Wei, Bo Chen, Lin Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor dna in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009985 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoyunhe diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT zhangkecheng diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT xihongqing diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT caiaizhen diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT wuxiaosong diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT cuijianxin diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT lijiyang diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT qiaozhi diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT weibo diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis AT chenlin diagnosticandprognosticvalueofcirculatingtumordnaingastriccancerametaanalysis |