Cargando…

Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity

Data-driven models of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity can elucidate dependencies that involve the combination of multiple brain regions. Activity in some regions during resting-state fMRI can be predicted with high accuracy from the activities of other regions. However, it rema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hay, Etay, Ritter, Petra, Lobaugh, Nancy J., McIntosh, Anthony R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28248957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005410
_version_ 1782514859905122304
author Hay, Etay
Ritter, Petra
Lobaugh, Nancy J.
McIntosh, Anthony R.
author_facet Hay, Etay
Ritter, Petra
Lobaugh, Nancy J.
McIntosh, Anthony R.
author_sort Hay, Etay
collection PubMed
description Data-driven models of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity can elucidate dependencies that involve the combination of multiple brain regions. Activity in some regions during resting-state fMRI can be predicted with high accuracy from the activities of other regions. However, it remains unclear in which regions activity depends on unique integration of multiple predictor regions. To address this question, sparse (parsimonious) models could serve to better determine key interregional dependencies by reducing false positives. We used resting-state fMRI data from 46 subjects, and for each region of interest (ROI) per subject we performed whole-brain recursive feature elimination (RFE) to select the minimal set of ROIs that best predicted activity in the modeled ROI. We quantified the dependence of activity on multiple predictor ROIs, by measuring the gain in prediction accuracy of models that incorporated multiple predictor ROIs compared to models that used a single predictor ROI. We identified regions that showed considerable evidence of multiregional integration and determined the key regions that contributed to their observed activity. Our models reveal fronto-parietal integration networks, little integration in primary sensory regions, as well as redundancy between some regions. Our study demonstrates the utility of whole-brain RFE to generate data-driven models with minimal sets of ROIs that predict activity with high accuracy. By determining the extent to which activity in each ROI depended on integration of signals from multiple ROIs, we find cortical integration networks during resting-state activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5352012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53520122017-04-06 Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity Hay, Etay Ritter, Petra Lobaugh, Nancy J. McIntosh, Anthony R. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Data-driven models of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity can elucidate dependencies that involve the combination of multiple brain regions. Activity in some regions during resting-state fMRI can be predicted with high accuracy from the activities of other regions. However, it remains unclear in which regions activity depends on unique integration of multiple predictor regions. To address this question, sparse (parsimonious) models could serve to better determine key interregional dependencies by reducing false positives. We used resting-state fMRI data from 46 subjects, and for each region of interest (ROI) per subject we performed whole-brain recursive feature elimination (RFE) to select the minimal set of ROIs that best predicted activity in the modeled ROI. We quantified the dependence of activity on multiple predictor ROIs, by measuring the gain in prediction accuracy of models that incorporated multiple predictor ROIs compared to models that used a single predictor ROI. We identified regions that showed considerable evidence of multiregional integration and determined the key regions that contributed to their observed activity. Our models reveal fronto-parietal integration networks, little integration in primary sensory regions, as well as redundancy between some regions. Our study demonstrates the utility of whole-brain RFE to generate data-driven models with minimal sets of ROIs that predict activity with high accuracy. By determining the extent to which activity in each ROI depended on integration of signals from multiple ROIs, we find cortical integration networks during resting-state activity. Public Library of Science 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5352012/ /pubmed/28248957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005410 Text en © 2017 Hay et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hay, Etay
Ritter, Petra
Lobaugh, Nancy J.
McIntosh, Anthony R.
Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity
title Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity
title_full Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity
title_fullStr Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity
title_full_unstemmed Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity
title_short Multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fMRI activity
title_sort multiregional integration in the brain during resting-state fmri activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28248957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005410
work_keys_str_mv AT hayetay multiregionalintegrationinthebrainduringrestingstatefmriactivity
AT ritterpetra multiregionalintegrationinthebrainduringrestingstatefmriactivity
AT lobaughnancyj multiregionalintegrationinthebrainduringrestingstatefmriactivity
AT mcintoshanthonyr multiregionalintegrationinthebrainduringrestingstatefmriactivity