Cargando…

Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry

Finding the best technique to identify BRAF mutations with a high sensitivity and specificity is mandatory for accurate patient selection for target therapy. BRAF mutation frequency ranges from 40 to 60% depending on melanoma clinical characteristics and detection technique used. Intertumoral hetero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruno, William, Martinuzzi, Claudia, Andreotti, Virginia, Pastorino, Lorenza, Spagnolo, Francesco, Dalmasso, Bruna, Cabiddu, Francesco, Gualco, Marina, Ballestrero, Alberto, Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna, Queirolo, Paola, Grillo, Federica, Mastracci, Luca, Ghiorzo, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039443
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14094
_version_ 1782514956246188032
author Bruno, William
Martinuzzi, Claudia
Andreotti, Virginia
Pastorino, Lorenza
Spagnolo, Francesco
Dalmasso, Bruna
Cabiddu, Francesco
Gualco, Marina
Ballestrero, Alberto
Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna
Queirolo, Paola
Grillo, Federica
Mastracci, Luca
Ghiorzo, Paola
author_facet Bruno, William
Martinuzzi, Claudia
Andreotti, Virginia
Pastorino, Lorenza
Spagnolo, Francesco
Dalmasso, Bruna
Cabiddu, Francesco
Gualco, Marina
Ballestrero, Alberto
Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna
Queirolo, Paola
Grillo, Federica
Mastracci, Luca
Ghiorzo, Paola
author_sort Bruno, William
collection PubMed
description Finding the best technique to identify BRAF mutations with a high sensitivity and specificity is mandatory for accurate patient selection for target therapy. BRAF mutation frequency ranges from 40 to 60% depending on melanoma clinical characteristics and detection technique used. Intertumoral heterogeneity could lead to misinterpretation of BRAF mutational status; this is especially important if testing is performed on primary specimens, when metastatic lesions are unavailable. Aim of this study was to identify the best combination of methods for detecting BRAF mutations (among peptide nucleic acid – PNA-clamping real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry and capillary sequencing) and investigate BRAF mutation heterogeneity in a series of 100 primary melanomas and a subset of 25 matched metastatic samples. Overall, we obtained a BRAF mutation frequency of 62%, based on the combination of at least two techniques. Concordance between mutation status in primary and metastatic tumor was good but not complete (67%), when agreement of at least two techniques were considered. Next generation sequencing was used to quantify the threshold of detected mutant alleles in discordant samples. Combining different methods excludes that the observed heterogeneity is technique-based. We propose an algorithm for BRAF mutation testing based on agreement between immunohistochemistry and PNA; a third molecular method could be added in case of discordance of the results. Testing the primary tumor when the metastatic sample is unavailable is a good option if at least two methods of detection are used, however the presence of intertumoral heterogeneity or the occurrence of additional primaries should be carefully considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5352383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53523832017-04-14 Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry Bruno, William Martinuzzi, Claudia Andreotti, Virginia Pastorino, Lorenza Spagnolo, Francesco Dalmasso, Bruna Cabiddu, Francesco Gualco, Marina Ballestrero, Alberto Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna Queirolo, Paola Grillo, Federica Mastracci, Luca Ghiorzo, Paola Oncotarget Research Paper Finding the best technique to identify BRAF mutations with a high sensitivity and specificity is mandatory for accurate patient selection for target therapy. BRAF mutation frequency ranges from 40 to 60% depending on melanoma clinical characteristics and detection technique used. Intertumoral heterogeneity could lead to misinterpretation of BRAF mutational status; this is especially important if testing is performed on primary specimens, when metastatic lesions are unavailable. Aim of this study was to identify the best combination of methods for detecting BRAF mutations (among peptide nucleic acid – PNA-clamping real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry and capillary sequencing) and investigate BRAF mutation heterogeneity in a series of 100 primary melanomas and a subset of 25 matched metastatic samples. Overall, we obtained a BRAF mutation frequency of 62%, based on the combination of at least two techniques. Concordance between mutation status in primary and metastatic tumor was good but not complete (67%), when agreement of at least two techniques were considered. Next generation sequencing was used to quantify the threshold of detected mutant alleles in discordant samples. Combining different methods excludes that the observed heterogeneity is technique-based. We propose an algorithm for BRAF mutation testing based on agreement between immunohistochemistry and PNA; a third molecular method could be added in case of discordance of the results. Testing the primary tumor when the metastatic sample is unavailable is a good option if at least two methods of detection are used, however the presence of intertumoral heterogeneity or the occurrence of additional primaries should be carefully considered. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5352383/ /pubmed/28039443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14094 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Bruno et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Bruno, William
Martinuzzi, Claudia
Andreotti, Virginia
Pastorino, Lorenza
Spagnolo, Francesco
Dalmasso, Bruna
Cabiddu, Francesco
Gualco, Marina
Ballestrero, Alberto
Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna
Queirolo, Paola
Grillo, Federica
Mastracci, Luca
Ghiorzo, Paola
Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
title Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
title_full Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
title_fullStr Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
title_short Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
title_sort heterogeneity and frequency of braf mutations in primary melanoma: comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039443
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14094
work_keys_str_mv AT brunowilliam heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT martinuzziclaudia heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT andreottivirginia heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT pastorinolorenza heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT spagnolofrancesco heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT dalmassobruna heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT cabiddufrancesco heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT gualcomarina heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT ballestreroalberto heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT bianchiscarragiovanna heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT queirolopaola heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT grillofederica heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT mastracciluca heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT ghiorzopaola heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry
AT heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry