Cargando…
Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry
Finding the best technique to identify BRAF mutations with a high sensitivity and specificity is mandatory for accurate patient selection for target therapy. BRAF mutation frequency ranges from 40 to 60% depending on melanoma clinical characteristics and detection technique used. Intertumoral hetero...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14094 |
_version_ | 1782514956246188032 |
---|---|
author | Bruno, William Martinuzzi, Claudia Andreotti, Virginia Pastorino, Lorenza Spagnolo, Francesco Dalmasso, Bruna Cabiddu, Francesco Gualco, Marina Ballestrero, Alberto Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna Queirolo, Paola Grillo, Federica Mastracci, Luca Ghiorzo, Paola |
author_facet | Bruno, William Martinuzzi, Claudia Andreotti, Virginia Pastorino, Lorenza Spagnolo, Francesco Dalmasso, Bruna Cabiddu, Francesco Gualco, Marina Ballestrero, Alberto Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna Queirolo, Paola Grillo, Federica Mastracci, Luca Ghiorzo, Paola |
author_sort | Bruno, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | Finding the best technique to identify BRAF mutations with a high sensitivity and specificity is mandatory for accurate patient selection for target therapy. BRAF mutation frequency ranges from 40 to 60% depending on melanoma clinical characteristics and detection technique used. Intertumoral heterogeneity could lead to misinterpretation of BRAF mutational status; this is especially important if testing is performed on primary specimens, when metastatic lesions are unavailable. Aim of this study was to identify the best combination of methods for detecting BRAF mutations (among peptide nucleic acid – PNA-clamping real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry and capillary sequencing) and investigate BRAF mutation heterogeneity in a series of 100 primary melanomas and a subset of 25 matched metastatic samples. Overall, we obtained a BRAF mutation frequency of 62%, based on the combination of at least two techniques. Concordance between mutation status in primary and metastatic tumor was good but not complete (67%), when agreement of at least two techniques were considered. Next generation sequencing was used to quantify the threshold of detected mutant alleles in discordant samples. Combining different methods excludes that the observed heterogeneity is technique-based. We propose an algorithm for BRAF mutation testing based on agreement between immunohistochemistry and PNA; a third molecular method could be added in case of discordance of the results. Testing the primary tumor when the metastatic sample is unavailable is a good option if at least two methods of detection are used, however the presence of intertumoral heterogeneity or the occurrence of additional primaries should be carefully considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5352383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53523832017-04-14 Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry Bruno, William Martinuzzi, Claudia Andreotti, Virginia Pastorino, Lorenza Spagnolo, Francesco Dalmasso, Bruna Cabiddu, Francesco Gualco, Marina Ballestrero, Alberto Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna Queirolo, Paola Grillo, Federica Mastracci, Luca Ghiorzo, Paola Oncotarget Research Paper Finding the best technique to identify BRAF mutations with a high sensitivity and specificity is mandatory for accurate patient selection for target therapy. BRAF mutation frequency ranges from 40 to 60% depending on melanoma clinical characteristics and detection technique used. Intertumoral heterogeneity could lead to misinterpretation of BRAF mutational status; this is especially important if testing is performed on primary specimens, when metastatic lesions are unavailable. Aim of this study was to identify the best combination of methods for detecting BRAF mutations (among peptide nucleic acid – PNA-clamping real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry and capillary sequencing) and investigate BRAF mutation heterogeneity in a series of 100 primary melanomas and a subset of 25 matched metastatic samples. Overall, we obtained a BRAF mutation frequency of 62%, based on the combination of at least two techniques. Concordance between mutation status in primary and metastatic tumor was good but not complete (67%), when agreement of at least two techniques were considered. Next generation sequencing was used to quantify the threshold of detected mutant alleles in discordant samples. Combining different methods excludes that the observed heterogeneity is technique-based. We propose an algorithm for BRAF mutation testing based on agreement between immunohistochemistry and PNA; a third molecular method could be added in case of discordance of the results. Testing the primary tumor when the metastatic sample is unavailable is a good option if at least two methods of detection are used, however the presence of intertumoral heterogeneity or the occurrence of additional primaries should be carefully considered. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5352383/ /pubmed/28039443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14094 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Bruno et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Bruno, William Martinuzzi, Claudia Andreotti, Virginia Pastorino, Lorenza Spagnolo, Francesco Dalmasso, Bruna Cabiddu, Francesco Gualco, Marina Ballestrero, Alberto Bianchi-Scarrà, Giovanna Queirolo, Paola Grillo, Federica Mastracci, Luca Ghiorzo, Paola Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
title | Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
title_full | Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
title_fullStr | Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
title_short | Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
title_sort | heterogeneity and frequency of braf mutations in primary melanoma: comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunowilliam heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT martinuzziclaudia heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT andreottivirginia heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT pastorinolorenza heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT spagnolofrancesco heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT dalmassobruna heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT cabiddufrancesco heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT gualcomarina heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT ballestreroalberto heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT bianchiscarragiovanna heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT queirolopaola heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT grillofederica heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT mastracciluca heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT ghiorzopaola heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry AT heterogeneityandfrequencyofbrafmutationsinprimarymelanomacomparisonbetweenmolecularmethodsandimmunohistochemistry |