Cargando…

Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile

PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrillo, Antonella, Fusco, Roberta, Petrillo, Mario, Granata, Vincenza, Delrio, Paolo, Bianco, Francesco, Pecori, Biagio, Botti, Gerardo, Tatangelo, Fabiana, Caracò, Corradina, Aloj, Luigi, Avallone, Antonio, Lastoria, Secondo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042958
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled in a prospective study. DCE-MRI analysis was performed measuring SIS: linear combination of percentage change (Δ) of maximum signal difference (MSD) and wash-out slope (WOS). (18)F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed using SUV maximum (SUV(max)). Tumor regression grade (TRG) were estimated after surgery. Non-parametric tests, receiver operating characteristic were evaluated. RESULTS: 55 patients (TRG1-2) were classified as responders while 20 subjects as non responders. ΔSIS reached sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 80% and accuracy of 89% (cut-off 6%) to differentiate responders by non responders, sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 69% and accuracy of 79% (cut-off 30%) to identify pathological complete response (pCR). Therapy assessment via ΔSUV(max) reached sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 75% and accuracy of 70% (cut-off 60%) to differentiate responders by non responders and sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 31% and accuracy of 51% (cut-off 44%) to identify pCR. CONCLUSIONS: CRT response assessment by DCE-MRI analysis shows a higher predictive ability than (18)F-FDG PET/CT in LARC patients allowing to better discriminate significant and pCR.