Cargando…

Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile

PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrillo, Antonella, Fusco, Roberta, Petrillo, Mario, Granata, Vincenza, Delrio, Paolo, Bianco, Francesco, Pecori, Biagio, Botti, Gerardo, Tatangelo, Fabiana, Caracò, Corradina, Aloj, Luigi, Avallone, Antonio, Lastoria, Secondo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042958
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106
_version_ 1782514960167862272
author Petrillo, Antonella
Fusco, Roberta
Petrillo, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Delrio, Paolo
Bianco, Francesco
Pecori, Biagio
Botti, Gerardo
Tatangelo, Fabiana
Caracò, Corradina
Aloj, Luigi
Avallone, Antonio
Lastoria, Secondo
author_facet Petrillo, Antonella
Fusco, Roberta
Petrillo, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Delrio, Paolo
Bianco, Francesco
Pecori, Biagio
Botti, Gerardo
Tatangelo, Fabiana
Caracò, Corradina
Aloj, Luigi
Avallone, Antonio
Lastoria, Secondo
author_sort Petrillo, Antonella
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled in a prospective study. DCE-MRI analysis was performed measuring SIS: linear combination of percentage change (Δ) of maximum signal difference (MSD) and wash-out slope (WOS). (18)F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed using SUV maximum (SUV(max)). Tumor regression grade (TRG) were estimated after surgery. Non-parametric tests, receiver operating characteristic were evaluated. RESULTS: 55 patients (TRG1-2) were classified as responders while 20 subjects as non responders. ΔSIS reached sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 80% and accuracy of 89% (cut-off 6%) to differentiate responders by non responders, sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 69% and accuracy of 79% (cut-off 30%) to identify pathological complete response (pCR). Therapy assessment via ΔSUV(max) reached sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 75% and accuracy of 70% (cut-off 60%) to differentiate responders by non responders and sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 31% and accuracy of 51% (cut-off 44%) to identify pCR. CONCLUSIONS: CRT response assessment by DCE-MRI analysis shows a higher predictive ability than (18)F-FDG PET/CT in LARC patients allowing to better discriminate significant and pCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5352389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53523892017-04-14 Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile Petrillo, Antonella Fusco, Roberta Petrillo, Mario Granata, Vincenza Delrio, Paolo Bianco, Francesco Pecori, Biagio Botti, Gerardo Tatangelo, Fabiana Caracò, Corradina Aloj, Luigi Avallone, Antonio Lastoria, Secondo Oncotarget Research Paper PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled in a prospective study. DCE-MRI analysis was performed measuring SIS: linear combination of percentage change (Δ) of maximum signal difference (MSD) and wash-out slope (WOS). (18)F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed using SUV maximum (SUV(max)). Tumor regression grade (TRG) were estimated after surgery. Non-parametric tests, receiver operating characteristic were evaluated. RESULTS: 55 patients (TRG1-2) were classified as responders while 20 subjects as non responders. ΔSIS reached sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 80% and accuracy of 89% (cut-off 6%) to differentiate responders by non responders, sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 69% and accuracy of 79% (cut-off 30%) to identify pathological complete response (pCR). Therapy assessment via ΔSUV(max) reached sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 75% and accuracy of 70% (cut-off 60%) to differentiate responders by non responders and sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 31% and accuracy of 51% (cut-off 44%) to identify pCR. CONCLUSIONS: CRT response assessment by DCE-MRI analysis shows a higher predictive ability than (18)F-FDG PET/CT in LARC patients allowing to better discriminate significant and pCR. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5352389/ /pubmed/28042958 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Petrillo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Petrillo, Antonella
Fusco, Roberta
Petrillo, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Delrio, Paolo
Bianco, Francesco
Pecori, Biagio
Botti, Gerardo
Tatangelo, Fabiana
Caracò, Corradina
Aloj, Luigi
Avallone, Antonio
Lastoria, Secondo
Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
title Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
title_full Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
title_fullStr Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
title_full_unstemmed Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
title_short Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
title_sort standardized index of shape (dce-mri) and standardized uptake value (pet/ct): two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042958
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106
work_keys_str_mv AT petrilloantonella standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT fuscoroberta standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT petrillomario standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT granatavincenza standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT delriopaolo standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT biancofrancesco standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT pecoribiagio standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT bottigerardo standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT tatangelofabiana standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT caracocorradina standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT alojluigi standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT avalloneantonio standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile
AT lastoriasecondo standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile