Cargando…
Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile
PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042958 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106 |
_version_ | 1782514960167862272 |
---|---|
author | Petrillo, Antonella Fusco, Roberta Petrillo, Mario Granata, Vincenza Delrio, Paolo Bianco, Francesco Pecori, Biagio Botti, Gerardo Tatangelo, Fabiana Caracò, Corradina Aloj, Luigi Avallone, Antonio Lastoria, Secondo |
author_facet | Petrillo, Antonella Fusco, Roberta Petrillo, Mario Granata, Vincenza Delrio, Paolo Bianco, Francesco Pecori, Biagio Botti, Gerardo Tatangelo, Fabiana Caracò, Corradina Aloj, Luigi Avallone, Antonio Lastoria, Secondo |
author_sort | Petrillo, Antonella |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled in a prospective study. DCE-MRI analysis was performed measuring SIS: linear combination of percentage change (Δ) of maximum signal difference (MSD) and wash-out slope (WOS). (18)F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed using SUV maximum (SUV(max)). Tumor regression grade (TRG) were estimated after surgery. Non-parametric tests, receiver operating characteristic were evaluated. RESULTS: 55 patients (TRG1-2) were classified as responders while 20 subjects as non responders. ΔSIS reached sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 80% and accuracy of 89% (cut-off 6%) to differentiate responders by non responders, sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 69% and accuracy of 79% (cut-off 30%) to identify pathological complete response (pCR). Therapy assessment via ΔSUV(max) reached sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 75% and accuracy of 70% (cut-off 60%) to differentiate responders by non responders and sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 31% and accuracy of 51% (cut-off 44%) to identify pCR. CONCLUSIONS: CRT response assessment by DCE-MRI analysis shows a higher predictive ability than (18)F-FDG PET/CT in LARC patients allowing to better discriminate significant and pCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5352389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53523892017-04-14 Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile Petrillo, Antonella Fusco, Roberta Petrillo, Mario Granata, Vincenza Delrio, Paolo Bianco, Francesco Pecori, Biagio Botti, Gerardo Tatangelo, Fabiana Caracò, Corradina Aloj, Luigi Avallone, Antonio Lastoria, Secondo Oncotarget Research Paper PURPOSE: To investigate dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) assessment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) compared to(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS: 75 consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled in a prospective study. DCE-MRI analysis was performed measuring SIS: linear combination of percentage change (Δ) of maximum signal difference (MSD) and wash-out slope (WOS). (18)F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed using SUV maximum (SUV(max)). Tumor regression grade (TRG) were estimated after surgery. Non-parametric tests, receiver operating characteristic were evaluated. RESULTS: 55 patients (TRG1-2) were classified as responders while 20 subjects as non responders. ΔSIS reached sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 80% and accuracy of 89% (cut-off 6%) to differentiate responders by non responders, sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 69% and accuracy of 79% (cut-off 30%) to identify pathological complete response (pCR). Therapy assessment via ΔSUV(max) reached sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 75% and accuracy of 70% (cut-off 60%) to differentiate responders by non responders and sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 31% and accuracy of 51% (cut-off 44%) to identify pCR. CONCLUSIONS: CRT response assessment by DCE-MRI analysis shows a higher predictive ability than (18)F-FDG PET/CT in LARC patients allowing to better discriminate significant and pCR. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5352389/ /pubmed/28042958 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Petrillo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Petrillo, Antonella Fusco, Roberta Petrillo, Mario Granata, Vincenza Delrio, Paolo Bianco, Francesco Pecori, Biagio Botti, Gerardo Tatangelo, Fabiana Caracò, Corradina Aloj, Luigi Avallone, Antonio Lastoria, Secondo Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
title | Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
title_full | Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
title_fullStr | Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
title_short | Standardized Index of Shape (DCE-MRI) and Standardized Uptake Value (PET/CT): Two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
title_sort | standardized index of shape (dce-mri) and standardized uptake value (pet/ct): two quantitative approaches to discriminate chemo-radiotherapy locally advanced rectal cancer responders under a functional profile |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042958 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrilloantonella standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT fuscoroberta standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT petrillomario standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT granatavincenza standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT delriopaolo standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT biancofrancesco standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT pecoribiagio standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT bottigerardo standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT tatangelofabiana standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT caracocorradina standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT alojluigi standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT avalloneantonio standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile AT lastoriasecondo standardizedindexofshapedcemriandstandardizeduptakevaluepetcttwoquantitativeapproachestodiscriminatechemoradiotherapylocallyadvancedrectalcancerrespondersunderafunctionalprofile |