Cargando…

Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners

Cochlear implants (CIs) convey fundamental-frequency information using primarily temporal cues. However, temporal pitch perception in CI users is weak and, when measured using rate discrimination tasks, deteriorates markedly as the rate increases beyond 300 pulses-per-second. Rate pitch may be weak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaudrain, Etienne, Deeks, John M., Carlyon, Robert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0586-4
_version_ 1782514984856584192
author Gaudrain, Etienne
Deeks, John M.
Carlyon, Robert P.
author_facet Gaudrain, Etienne
Deeks, John M.
Carlyon, Robert P.
author_sort Gaudrain, Etienne
collection PubMed
description Cochlear implants (CIs) convey fundamental-frequency information using primarily temporal cues. However, temporal pitch perception in CI users is weak and, when measured using rate discrimination tasks, deteriorates markedly as the rate increases beyond 300 pulses-per-second. Rate pitch may be weak because the electrical stimulation of the surviving neural population of the implant recipient may not allow accurate coding of inter-pulse time intervals. If so, this phenomenon should prevent listeners from detecting when a pulse train is physically temporally jittered. Performance in a jitter detection task was compared to that in a rate-pitch discrimination task. Stimuli were delivered using direct stimulation in cochlear implants, on a mid-array and an apical electrode, and at two different rates (100 and 300 pps). Average performance on both tasks was worse at the higher pulse rate and did not depend on electrode. However, there was a large variability across and within listeners that did not correlate between the two tasks, suggesting that rate-pitch judgement and regularity detection are to some extent limited by task-specific processes. Simulations with filtered pulse trains presented to NH listeners yielded broadly similar results, except that, for the rate discrimination task, the difference between performance with 100- and 300-pps base rates was smaller than observed for CI users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5352605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53526052017-03-27 Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners Gaudrain, Etienne Deeks, John M. Carlyon, Robert P. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article Cochlear implants (CIs) convey fundamental-frequency information using primarily temporal cues. However, temporal pitch perception in CI users is weak and, when measured using rate discrimination tasks, deteriorates markedly as the rate increases beyond 300 pulses-per-second. Rate pitch may be weak because the electrical stimulation of the surviving neural population of the implant recipient may not allow accurate coding of inter-pulse time intervals. If so, this phenomenon should prevent listeners from detecting when a pulse train is physically temporally jittered. Performance in a jitter detection task was compared to that in a rate-pitch discrimination task. Stimuli were delivered using direct stimulation in cochlear implants, on a mid-array and an apical electrode, and at two different rates (100 and 300 pps). Average performance on both tasks was worse at the higher pulse rate and did not depend on electrode. However, there was a large variability across and within listeners that did not correlate between the two tasks, suggesting that rate-pitch judgement and regularity detection are to some extent limited by task-specific processes. Simulations with filtered pulse trains presented to NH listeners yielded broadly similar results, except that, for the rate discrimination task, the difference between performance with 100- and 300-pps base rates was smaller than observed for CI users. Springer US 2016-09-29 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5352605/ /pubmed/27687041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0586-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gaudrain, Etienne
Deeks, John M.
Carlyon, Robert P.
Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_full Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_fullStr Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_short Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
title_sort temporal regularity detection and rate discrimination in cochlear-implant listeners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0586-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gaudrainetienne temporalregularitydetectionandratediscriminationincochlearimplantlisteners
AT deeksjohnm temporalregularitydetectionandratediscriminationincochlearimplantlisteners
AT carlyonrobertp temporalregularitydetectionandratediscriminationincochlearimplantlisteners