Cargando…
Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/hta000128 |
_version_ | 1782515069821648896 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Anna Mae Hofmann, Björn Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin Sandman, Lars Bombard, Yvonne |
author_facet | Scott, Anna Mae Hofmann, Björn Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin Sandman, Lars Bombard, Yvonne |
author_sort | Scott, Anna Mae |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations’ websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains – the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5352988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53529882017-03-21 Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments Scott, Anna Mae Hofmann, Björn Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin Sandman, Lars Bombard, Yvonne GMS Health Technol Assess Article Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations’ websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains – the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5352988/ /pubmed/28326147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/hta000128 Text en Copyright © 2017 Scott et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Scott, Anna Mae Hofmann, Björn Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin Sandman, Lars Bombard, Yvonne Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
title | Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
title_full | Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
title_fullStr | Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
title_short | Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
title_sort | q-sea – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/hta000128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottannamae qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments AT hofmannbjorn qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments AT gutierrezibarluzeainaki qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments AT bakkelysdahlkristin qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments AT sandmanlars qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments AT bombardyvonne qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments |