Cargando…

Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments

Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Anna Mae, Hofmann, Björn, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki, Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin, Sandman, Lars, Bombard, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/hta000128
_version_ 1782515069821648896
author Scott, Anna Mae
Hofmann, Björn
Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki
Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin
Sandman, Lars
Bombard, Yvonne
author_facet Scott, Anna Mae
Hofmann, Björn
Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki
Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin
Sandman, Lars
Bombard, Yvonne
author_sort Scott, Anna Mae
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations’ websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains – the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5352988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53529882017-03-21 Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments Scott, Anna Mae Hofmann, Björn Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin Sandman, Lars Bombard, Yvonne GMS Health Technol Assess Article Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations’ websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains – the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5352988/ /pubmed/28326147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/hta000128 Text en Copyright © 2017 Scott et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Scott, Anna Mae
Hofmann, Björn
Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki
Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin
Sandman, Lars
Bombard, Yvonne
Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
title Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
title_full Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
title_fullStr Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
title_full_unstemmed Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
title_short Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
title_sort q-sea – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5352988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/hta000128
work_keys_str_mv AT scottannamae qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments
AT hofmannbjorn qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments
AT gutierrezibarluzeainaki qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments
AT bakkelysdahlkristin qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments
AT sandmanlars qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments
AT bombardyvonne qseaatoolforqualityassessmentofethicsanalysesconductedaspartofhealthtechnologyassessments