Cargando…

Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To observe the influences on clinicians when discharging patients, to explore patients' perspectives concerning their discharge or follow-up decision and to identify what patients think is important for clinicians to consider when taking a discharge decision. DESIGN: Qualitative stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harun, N A, Finlay, A Y, Piguet, V, Salek, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010807
_version_ 1782515092215037952
author Harun, N A
Finlay, A Y
Piguet, V
Salek, S
author_facet Harun, N A
Finlay, A Y
Piguet, V
Salek, S
author_sort Harun, N A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To observe the influences on clinicians when discharging patients, to explore patients' perspectives concerning their discharge or follow-up decision and to identify what patients think is important for clinicians to consider when taking a discharge decision. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving observations of consultations and semistructured interviews with outpatients. SETTING: National Health Service outpatient clinics at a university hospital secondary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: 64 consultations were observed followed by 56 interviews with patients aged over 18 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Analysis of patients' perspectives and expectations concerning whether or not they were discharged. RESULTS: 25 types of influences were observed to be influencing the discharge decision process. All 31 discharged patients appeared to accept the clinicians' decision; however, 10 (22%) of those patients later expressed disappointment. Patients' discontent was due to perceived clinicians' uncertainty in diagnosis (patients mentioning=2), poor acceptance of the diagnosis (2), disease not ‘cured’ (4), differing perception on medical needs (2), lack of concern for job demands (1), felt uninvolved in the decision-making (4), feeling rushed (3), prolonged open appointment (2), pushed to seek private care due to healthcare budget constraints (2), language barrier (1) and not keen to continue follow-up with general practitioner (2). Patients were happy when there was certainty of the diagnosis (19), clear treatment plan (16), advised on treatment side effects (7), given a contact number if symptoms recurred (4), considering their travelling and job demands (3). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of accurately perceiving patients' perspectives in ensuring the appropriateness of outpatient discharge. There was a disparity between patients' and clinicians' perception on what was an appropriate discharge. This included discrepancies concerning diagnostic certainties, private healthcare as an alternative, need for easy reaccess and choice of words surrounding discharge. Medical education should include handling these issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5353329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53533292017-03-17 Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study Harun, N A Finlay, A Y Piguet, V Salek, S BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVE: To observe the influences on clinicians when discharging patients, to explore patients' perspectives concerning their discharge or follow-up decision and to identify what patients think is important for clinicians to consider when taking a discharge decision. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving observations of consultations and semistructured interviews with outpatients. SETTING: National Health Service outpatient clinics at a university hospital secondary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: 64 consultations were observed followed by 56 interviews with patients aged over 18 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Analysis of patients' perspectives and expectations concerning whether or not they were discharged. RESULTS: 25 types of influences were observed to be influencing the discharge decision process. All 31 discharged patients appeared to accept the clinicians' decision; however, 10 (22%) of those patients later expressed disappointment. Patients' discontent was due to perceived clinicians' uncertainty in diagnosis (patients mentioning=2), poor acceptance of the diagnosis (2), disease not ‘cured’ (4), differing perception on medical needs (2), lack of concern for job demands (1), felt uninvolved in the decision-making (4), feeling rushed (3), prolonged open appointment (2), pushed to seek private care due to healthcare budget constraints (2), language barrier (1) and not keen to continue follow-up with general practitioner (2). Patients were happy when there was certainty of the diagnosis (19), clear treatment plan (16), advised on treatment side effects (7), given a contact number if symptoms recurred (4), considering their travelling and job demands (3). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of accurately perceiving patients' perspectives in ensuring the appropriateness of outpatient discharge. There was a disparity between patients' and clinicians' perception on what was an appropriate discharge. This included discrepancies concerning diagnostic certainties, private healthcare as an alternative, need for easy reaccess and choice of words surrounding discharge. Medical education should include handling these issues. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5353329/ /pubmed/28264822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010807 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Harun, N A
Finlay, A Y
Piguet, V
Salek, S
Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
title Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
title_full Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
title_short Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
title_sort understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010807
work_keys_str_mv AT harunna understandingclinicianinfluencesandpatientperspectivesonoutpatientdischargedecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT finlayay understandingclinicianinfluencesandpatientperspectivesonoutpatientdischargedecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT piguetv understandingclinicianinfluencesandpatientperspectivesonoutpatientdischargedecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT saleks understandingclinicianinfluencesandpatientperspectivesonoutpatientdischargedecisionsaqualitativestudy