Cargando…

Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SETTING: We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spiegel, D A, Droti, B, Relan, P, Hobson, S, Cherian, M N, O'Neill, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496
_version_ 1782515092441530368
author Spiegel, D A
Droti, B
Relan, P
Hobson, S
Cherian, M N
O'Neill, K
author_facet Spiegel, D A
Droti, B
Relan, P
Hobson, S
Cherian, M N
O'Neill, K
author_sort Spiegel, D A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SETTING: We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obstetric care, blood transfusion, and infection prevention, obtained from the WHO's SARA surveys in Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritania, Benin, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Among the facilities that were expected to offer surgical services (N=3492), there were wide disparities between the countries in the number of facilities per 100 000 population that reported offering basic surgery (1.0–12.1), comprehensive surgery (0.1–0.8), comprehensive obstetric care (0.1–0.8) and blood transfusion (0.1–0.8). Only 0.1–0.3 facilities per 100 000 population had all three bellwether procedures available, namely laparotomy, open fracture management and caesarean section. In all the countries, the facilities that reported offering surgical services generally had a shortage of the necessary items for offering the services and this varied greatly between the countries, with the facilities having on average 27–53% of the items necessary for offering basic surgery, 56–83% for comprehensive surgery, 49–72% for comprehensive obstetric care and 54–80% for blood transfusion. Furthermore, few facilities had all the necessary items present. However, facilities that reported offering surgical services had on average most of the necessary items for the prevention of infection. CONCLUSIONS: There are important gaps in the surgical services in the 8 African countries surveyed. Efforts are therefore urgently needed to address deficiencies in the availability and readiness to deliver surgical services in these nations, and this will require commitment from multiple stakeholders. SARA may be used to monitor availability and readiness at regular intervals, which will enable stakeholders to evaluate progress and identify gaps and areas for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5353330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53533302017-03-17 Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries Spiegel, D A Droti, B Relan, P Hobson, S Cherian, M N O'Neill, K BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SETTING: We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obstetric care, blood transfusion, and infection prevention, obtained from the WHO's SARA surveys in Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritania, Benin, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Among the facilities that were expected to offer surgical services (N=3492), there were wide disparities between the countries in the number of facilities per 100 000 population that reported offering basic surgery (1.0–12.1), comprehensive surgery (0.1–0.8), comprehensive obstetric care (0.1–0.8) and blood transfusion (0.1–0.8). Only 0.1–0.3 facilities per 100 000 population had all three bellwether procedures available, namely laparotomy, open fracture management and caesarean section. In all the countries, the facilities that reported offering surgical services generally had a shortage of the necessary items for offering the services and this varied greatly between the countries, with the facilities having on average 27–53% of the items necessary for offering basic surgery, 56–83% for comprehensive surgery, 49–72% for comprehensive obstetric care and 54–80% for blood transfusion. Furthermore, few facilities had all the necessary items present. However, facilities that reported offering surgical services had on average most of the necessary items for the prevention of infection. CONCLUSIONS: There are important gaps in the surgical services in the 8 African countries surveyed. Efforts are therefore urgently needed to address deficiencies in the availability and readiness to deliver surgical services in these nations, and this will require commitment from multiple stakeholders. SARA may be used to monitor availability and readiness at regular intervals, which will enable stakeholders to evaluate progress and identify gaps and areas for improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5353330/ /pubmed/28264832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Global Health
Spiegel, D A
Droti, B
Relan, P
Hobson, S
Cherian, M N
O'Neill, K
Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
title Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
title_full Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
title_fullStr Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
title_short Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
title_sort retrospective review of surgical availability and readiness in 8 african countries
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496
work_keys_str_mv AT spiegelda retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries
AT drotib retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries
AT relanp retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries
AT hobsons retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries
AT cherianmn retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries
AT oneillk retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries