Cargando…
Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SETTING: We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496 |
_version_ | 1782515092441530368 |
---|---|
author | Spiegel, D A Droti, B Relan, P Hobson, S Cherian, M N O'Neill, K |
author_facet | Spiegel, D A Droti, B Relan, P Hobson, S Cherian, M N O'Neill, K |
author_sort | Spiegel, D A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SETTING: We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obstetric care, blood transfusion, and infection prevention, obtained from the WHO's SARA surveys in Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritania, Benin, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Among the facilities that were expected to offer surgical services (N=3492), there were wide disparities between the countries in the number of facilities per 100 000 population that reported offering basic surgery (1.0–12.1), comprehensive surgery (0.1–0.8), comprehensive obstetric care (0.1–0.8) and blood transfusion (0.1–0.8). Only 0.1–0.3 facilities per 100 000 population had all three bellwether procedures available, namely laparotomy, open fracture management and caesarean section. In all the countries, the facilities that reported offering surgical services generally had a shortage of the necessary items for offering the services and this varied greatly between the countries, with the facilities having on average 27–53% of the items necessary for offering basic surgery, 56–83% for comprehensive surgery, 49–72% for comprehensive obstetric care and 54–80% for blood transfusion. Furthermore, few facilities had all the necessary items present. However, facilities that reported offering surgical services had on average most of the necessary items for the prevention of infection. CONCLUSIONS: There are important gaps in the surgical services in the 8 African countries surveyed. Efforts are therefore urgently needed to address deficiencies in the availability and readiness to deliver surgical services in these nations, and this will require commitment from multiple stakeholders. SARA may be used to monitor availability and readiness at regular intervals, which will enable stakeholders to evaluate progress and identify gaps and areas for improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5353330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53533302017-03-17 Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries Spiegel, D A Droti, B Relan, P Hobson, S Cherian, M N O'Neill, K BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical availability and readiness in 8 African countries using the WHO's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SETTING: We analysed data for surgical services, including basic and comprehensive surgery, comprehensive obstetric care, blood transfusion, and infection prevention, obtained from the WHO's SARA surveys in Sierra Leone, Uganda, Mauritania, Benin, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Among the facilities that were expected to offer surgical services (N=3492), there were wide disparities between the countries in the number of facilities per 100 000 population that reported offering basic surgery (1.0–12.1), comprehensive surgery (0.1–0.8), comprehensive obstetric care (0.1–0.8) and blood transfusion (0.1–0.8). Only 0.1–0.3 facilities per 100 000 population had all three bellwether procedures available, namely laparotomy, open fracture management and caesarean section. In all the countries, the facilities that reported offering surgical services generally had a shortage of the necessary items for offering the services and this varied greatly between the countries, with the facilities having on average 27–53% of the items necessary for offering basic surgery, 56–83% for comprehensive surgery, 49–72% for comprehensive obstetric care and 54–80% for blood transfusion. Furthermore, few facilities had all the necessary items present. However, facilities that reported offering surgical services had on average most of the necessary items for the prevention of infection. CONCLUSIONS: There are important gaps in the surgical services in the 8 African countries surveyed. Efforts are therefore urgently needed to address deficiencies in the availability and readiness to deliver surgical services in these nations, and this will require commitment from multiple stakeholders. SARA may be used to monitor availability and readiness at regular intervals, which will enable stakeholders to evaluate progress and identify gaps and areas for improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5353330/ /pubmed/28264832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Global Health Spiegel, D A Droti, B Relan, P Hobson, S Cherian, M N O'Neill, K Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries |
title | Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries |
title_full | Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries |
title_fullStr | Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries |
title_short | Retrospective review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African countries |
title_sort | retrospective review of surgical availability and readiness in 8 african countries |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28264832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spiegelda retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries AT drotib retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries AT relanp retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries AT hobsons retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries AT cherianmn retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries AT oneillk retrospectivereviewofsurgicalavailabilityandreadinessin8africancountries |