Cargando…

Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management

OBJECTIVE: To (1) explore patients' expectations and experiences of nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescriber-led management of respiratory tract infections (RTIs), (2) examine whether patient expectations for antibiotics affect the likelihood of receiving them and (3) understand factors infl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courtenay, Molly, Rowbotham, Samantha, Lim, Rosemary, Deslandes, Rhian, Hodson, Karen, MacLure, Katie, Peters, Sarah, Stewart, Derek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013515
_version_ 1782515096731254784
author Courtenay, Molly
Rowbotham, Samantha
Lim, Rosemary
Deslandes, Rhian
Hodson, Karen
MacLure, Katie
Peters, Sarah
Stewart, Derek
author_facet Courtenay, Molly
Rowbotham, Samantha
Lim, Rosemary
Deslandes, Rhian
Hodson, Karen
MacLure, Katie
Peters, Sarah
Stewart, Derek
author_sort Courtenay, Molly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To (1) explore patients' expectations and experiences of nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescriber-led management of respiratory tract infections (RTIs), (2) examine whether patient expectations for antibiotics affect the likelihood of receiving them and (3) understand factors influencing patient satisfaction with RTI consultations. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires from 120 patients and follow-up interviews with 22 patients and 16 nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescribers (NMPs). RESULTS: Patients had multiple expectations of their consultation with 43% expecting to be prescribed an antibiotic. There was alignment between self-reported patient expectations and those perceived by NMPs. Patient expectations for non-antibiotic strategies, such as education to promote self-management, were associated with receipt of those strategies, whereas patient expectations for an antibiotic were not associated with receipt of these medications. ‘Patient-centred’ management strategies (including reassurance and providing information) were received by 86.7% of patients. Regardless of patients' expectations or the management strategy employed, high levels of satisfaction were reported for all aspects of the consultation. Taking concerns seriously, conducting a physical examination, communicating the treatment plan, explaining treatment decisions and lack of time restrictions were each reported to contribute to patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: NMPs demonstrate an understanding of patient expectations of RTI consultations and use a range of non-antibiotic management strategies, particularly those resembling a patient-centred approach. Overall, patients' expectations were met and prescribers were not unduly influenced by patient expectations for an antibiotic. Patients were satisfied with the consultation, indicating that strategies used by NMPs were acceptable. However, the lower levels of satisfaction among patients who expected but did not receive an antibiotic indicates that although NMPs appear to have strategies for managing RTI consultations, there is still scope for improvement and these prescribers are therefore an important group to involve in antimicrobial stewardship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5353344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53533442017-03-17 Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management Courtenay, Molly Rowbotham, Samantha Lim, Rosemary Deslandes, Rhian Hodson, Karen MacLure, Katie Peters, Sarah Stewart, Derek BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVE: To (1) explore patients' expectations and experiences of nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescriber-led management of respiratory tract infections (RTIs), (2) examine whether patient expectations for antibiotics affect the likelihood of receiving them and (3) understand factors influencing patient satisfaction with RTI consultations. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires from 120 patients and follow-up interviews with 22 patients and 16 nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescribers (NMPs). RESULTS: Patients had multiple expectations of their consultation with 43% expecting to be prescribed an antibiotic. There was alignment between self-reported patient expectations and those perceived by NMPs. Patient expectations for non-antibiotic strategies, such as education to promote self-management, were associated with receipt of those strategies, whereas patient expectations for an antibiotic were not associated with receipt of these medications. ‘Patient-centred’ management strategies (including reassurance and providing information) were received by 86.7% of patients. Regardless of patients' expectations or the management strategy employed, high levels of satisfaction were reported for all aspects of the consultation. Taking concerns seriously, conducting a physical examination, communicating the treatment plan, explaining treatment decisions and lack of time restrictions were each reported to contribute to patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: NMPs demonstrate an understanding of patient expectations of RTI consultations and use a range of non-antibiotic management strategies, particularly those resembling a patient-centred approach. Overall, patients' expectations were met and prescribers were not unduly influenced by patient expectations for an antibiotic. Patients were satisfied with the consultation, indicating that strategies used by NMPs were acceptable. However, the lower levels of satisfaction among patients who expected but did not receive an antibiotic indicates that although NMPs appear to have strategies for managing RTI consultations, there is still scope for improvement and these prescribers are therefore an important group to involve in antimicrobial stewardship. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5353344/ /pubmed/28298366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013515 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Communication
Courtenay, Molly
Rowbotham, Samantha
Lim, Rosemary
Deslandes, Rhian
Hodson, Karen
MacLure, Katie
Peters, Sarah
Stewart, Derek
Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
title Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
title_full Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
title_fullStr Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
title_short Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
title_sort antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013515
work_keys_str_mv AT courtenaymolly antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT rowbothamsamantha antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT limrosemary antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT deslandesrhian antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT hodsonkaren antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT maclurekatie antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT peterssarah antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement
AT stewartderek antibioticsforacuterespiratorytractinfectionsamixedmethodsstudyofpatientexperiencesofnonmedicalprescribermanagement