Cargando…

Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?

Aims and method A service evaluation was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients who were street homeless (‘rough sleepers’) and who were compulsorily admitted to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. The data were collected from the patients' case notes. Results At 1-year follow-up, pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timms, Philip, Perry, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449
_version_ 1782515120491986944
author Timms, Philip
Perry, Jennifer
author_facet Timms, Philip
Perry, Jennifer
author_sort Timms, Philip
collection PubMed
description Aims and method A service evaluation was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients who were street homeless (‘rough sleepers’) and who were compulsorily admitted to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. The data were collected from the patients' case notes. Results At 1-year follow-up, patients had positive outcomes in areas such as accommodation status, registration with a general practitioner and engagement with the clinical team. Clinical implications The study shows that the intervention of a Mental Health Act assessment and compulsory hospital admission in homeless people on the street is associated with positive outcomes at 1 year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5353509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of Psychiatrists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53535092017-04-04 Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? Timms, Philip Perry, Jennifer BJPsych Bull Original Papers Aims and method A service evaluation was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients who were street homeless (‘rough sleepers’) and who were compulsorily admitted to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. The data were collected from the patients' case notes. Results At 1-year follow-up, patients had positive outcomes in areas such as accommodation status, registration with a general practitioner and engagement with the clinical team. Clinical implications The study shows that the intervention of a Mental Health Act assessment and compulsory hospital admission in homeless people on the street is associated with positive outcomes at 1 year. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5353509/ /pubmed/28377807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Timms, Philip
Perry, Jennifer
Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
title Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
title_full Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
title_fullStr Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
title_full_unstemmed Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
title_short Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
title_sort sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449
work_keys_str_mv AT timmsphilip sectioningonthestreetfutilityorutility
AT perryjennifer sectioningonthestreetfutilityorutility