Cargando…
Sectioning on the street – futility or utility?
Aims and method A service evaluation was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients who were street homeless (‘rough sleepers’) and who were compulsorily admitted to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. The data were collected from the patients' case notes. Results At 1-year follow-up, pa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Psychiatrists
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449 |
_version_ | 1782515120491986944 |
---|---|
author | Timms, Philip Perry, Jennifer |
author_facet | Timms, Philip Perry, Jennifer |
author_sort | Timms, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims and method A service evaluation was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients who were street homeless (‘rough sleepers’) and who were compulsorily admitted to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. The data were collected from the patients' case notes. Results At 1-year follow-up, patients had positive outcomes in areas such as accommodation status, registration with a general practitioner and engagement with the clinical team. Clinical implications The study shows that the intervention of a Mental Health Act assessment and compulsory hospital admission in homeless people on the street is associated with positive outcomes at 1 year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5353509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal College of Psychiatrists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53535092017-04-04 Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? Timms, Philip Perry, Jennifer BJPsych Bull Original Papers Aims and method A service evaluation was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients who were street homeless (‘rough sleepers’) and who were compulsorily admitted to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983. The data were collected from the patients' case notes. Results At 1-year follow-up, patients had positive outcomes in areas such as accommodation status, registration with a general practitioner and engagement with the clinical team. Clinical implications The study shows that the intervention of a Mental Health Act assessment and compulsory hospital admission in homeless people on the street is associated with positive outcomes at 1 year. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5353509/ /pubmed/28377807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Timms, Philip Perry, Jennifer Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
title | Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
title_full | Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
title_fullStr | Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
title_short | Sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
title_sort | sectioning on the street – futility or utility? |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28377807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmsphilip sectioningonthestreetfutilityorutility AT perryjennifer sectioningonthestreetfutilityorutility |