Cargando…

Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial

AIMS: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS interval, a substantial proportion of patients remain non-responsive. The SonR contractility sensor embedded in the right atrial lead enables individualized automatic optim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brugada, Josep, Delnoy, Peter Paul, Brachmann, Johannes, Reynolds, Dwight, Padeletti, Luigi, Noelker, Georg, Kantipudi, Charan, Rubin Lopez, José Manuel, Dichtl, Wolfgang, Borri-Brunetto, Alberto, Verhees, Luc, Ritter, Philippe, Singh, Jagmeet P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27941020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw526
_version_ 1782515187925909504
author Brugada, Josep
Delnoy, Peter Paul
Brachmann, Johannes
Reynolds, Dwight
Padeletti, Luigi
Noelker, Georg
Kantipudi, Charan
Rubin Lopez, José Manuel
Dichtl, Wolfgang
Borri-Brunetto, Alberto
Verhees, Luc
Ritter, Philippe
Singh, Jagmeet P.
author_facet Brugada, Josep
Delnoy, Peter Paul
Brachmann, Johannes
Reynolds, Dwight
Padeletti, Luigi
Noelker, Georg
Kantipudi, Charan
Rubin Lopez, José Manuel
Dichtl, Wolfgang
Borri-Brunetto, Alberto
Verhees, Luc
Ritter, Philippe
Singh, Jagmeet P.
author_sort Brugada, Josep
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS interval, a substantial proportion of patients remain non-responsive. The SonR contractility sensor embedded in the right atrial lead enables individualized automatic optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timings. The RESPOND-CRT study investigated the safety and efficacy of the contractility sensor system in HF patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: RESPOND-CRT was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized (2:1, respectively) to receive weekly, automatic CRT optimization with SonR vs. an Echo-guided optimization of AV and VV timings. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of clinical responders (patients alive, without adjudicated HF-related events, with improvement in New York Heart Association class or quality of life), at 12 months. The study randomized 998 patients. Responder rates were 75.0% in the SonR arm and 70.4% in the Echo arm (mean difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, −1.4% to 10.6%; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority margin −10.0%) (Table 2). At an overall mean follow-up of 548 ± 190 days SonR was associated with a 35% risk reduction in HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.92; log-rank P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic AV and VV optimization using the contractility sensor was safe and as effective as Echo-guided AV and VV optimization in increasing response to CRT. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT01534234
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5353752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53537522017-03-23 Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial Brugada, Josep Delnoy, Peter Paul Brachmann, Johannes Reynolds, Dwight Padeletti, Luigi Noelker, Georg Kantipudi, Charan Rubin Lopez, José Manuel Dichtl, Wolfgang Borri-Brunetto, Alberto Verhees, Luc Ritter, Philippe Singh, Jagmeet P. Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS interval, a substantial proportion of patients remain non-responsive. The SonR contractility sensor embedded in the right atrial lead enables individualized automatic optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timings. The RESPOND-CRT study investigated the safety and efficacy of the contractility sensor system in HF patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: RESPOND-CRT was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized (2:1, respectively) to receive weekly, automatic CRT optimization with SonR vs. an Echo-guided optimization of AV and VV timings. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of clinical responders (patients alive, without adjudicated HF-related events, with improvement in New York Heart Association class or quality of life), at 12 months. The study randomized 998 patients. Responder rates were 75.0% in the SonR arm and 70.4% in the Echo arm (mean difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, −1.4% to 10.6%; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority margin −10.0%) (Table 2). At an overall mean follow-up of 548 ± 190 days SonR was associated with a 35% risk reduction in HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.92; log-rank P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic AV and VV optimization using the contractility sensor was safe and as effective as Echo-guided AV and VV optimization in increasing response to CRT. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT01534234 Oxford University Press 2017-03-07 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5353752/ /pubmed/27941020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw526 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Brugada, Josep
Delnoy, Peter Paul
Brachmann, Johannes
Reynolds, Dwight
Padeletti, Luigi
Noelker, Georg
Kantipudi, Charan
Rubin Lopez, José Manuel
Dichtl, Wolfgang
Borri-Brunetto, Alberto
Verhees, Luc
Ritter, Philippe
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
title Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
title_full Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
title_fullStr Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
title_full_unstemmed Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
title_short Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
title_sort contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the respond-crt trial
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27941020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw526
work_keys_str_mv AT brugadajosep contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT delnoypeterpaul contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT brachmannjohannes contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT reynoldsdwight contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT padelettiluigi contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT noelkergeorg contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT kantipudicharan contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT rubinlopezjosemanuel contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT dichtlwolfgang contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT borribrunettoalberto contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT verheesluc contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT ritterphilippe contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT singhjagmeetp contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial
AT contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial