Cargando…
Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial
AIMS: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS interval, a substantial proportion of patients remain non-responsive. The SonR contractility sensor embedded in the right atrial lead enables individualized automatic optim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27941020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw526 |
_version_ | 1782515187925909504 |
---|---|
author | Brugada, Josep Delnoy, Peter Paul Brachmann, Johannes Reynolds, Dwight Padeletti, Luigi Noelker, Georg Kantipudi, Charan Rubin Lopez, José Manuel Dichtl, Wolfgang Borri-Brunetto, Alberto Verhees, Luc Ritter, Philippe Singh, Jagmeet P. |
author_facet | Brugada, Josep Delnoy, Peter Paul Brachmann, Johannes Reynolds, Dwight Padeletti, Luigi Noelker, Georg Kantipudi, Charan Rubin Lopez, José Manuel Dichtl, Wolfgang Borri-Brunetto, Alberto Verhees, Luc Ritter, Philippe Singh, Jagmeet P. |
author_sort | Brugada, Josep |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS interval, a substantial proportion of patients remain non-responsive. The SonR contractility sensor embedded in the right atrial lead enables individualized automatic optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timings. The RESPOND-CRT study investigated the safety and efficacy of the contractility sensor system in HF patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: RESPOND-CRT was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized (2:1, respectively) to receive weekly, automatic CRT optimization with SonR vs. an Echo-guided optimization of AV and VV timings. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of clinical responders (patients alive, without adjudicated HF-related events, with improvement in New York Heart Association class or quality of life), at 12 months. The study randomized 998 patients. Responder rates were 75.0% in the SonR arm and 70.4% in the Echo arm (mean difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, −1.4% to 10.6%; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority margin −10.0%) (Table 2). At an overall mean follow-up of 548 ± 190 days SonR was associated with a 35% risk reduction in HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.92; log-rank P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic AV and VV optimization using the contractility sensor was safe and as effective as Echo-guided AV and VV optimization in increasing response to CRT. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT01534234 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5353752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53537522017-03-23 Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial Brugada, Josep Delnoy, Peter Paul Brachmann, Johannes Reynolds, Dwight Padeletti, Luigi Noelker, Georg Kantipudi, Charan Rubin Lopez, José Manuel Dichtl, Wolfgang Borri-Brunetto, Alberto Verhees, Luc Ritter, Philippe Singh, Jagmeet P. Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and a wide QRS interval, a substantial proportion of patients remain non-responsive. The SonR contractility sensor embedded in the right atrial lead enables individualized automatic optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timings. The RESPOND-CRT study investigated the safety and efficacy of the contractility sensor system in HF patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: RESPOND-CRT was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized (2:1, respectively) to receive weekly, automatic CRT optimization with SonR vs. an Echo-guided optimization of AV and VV timings. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of clinical responders (patients alive, without adjudicated HF-related events, with improvement in New York Heart Association class or quality of life), at 12 months. The study randomized 998 patients. Responder rates were 75.0% in the SonR arm and 70.4% in the Echo arm (mean difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, −1.4% to 10.6%; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority margin −10.0%) (Table 2). At an overall mean follow-up of 548 ± 190 days SonR was associated with a 35% risk reduction in HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.92; log-rank P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Automatic AV and VV optimization using the contractility sensor was safe and as effective as Echo-guided AV and VV optimization in increasing response to CRT. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT01534234 Oxford University Press 2017-03-07 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5353752/ /pubmed/27941020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw526 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Brugada, Josep Delnoy, Peter Paul Brachmann, Johannes Reynolds, Dwight Padeletti, Luigi Noelker, Georg Kantipudi, Charan Rubin Lopez, José Manuel Dichtl, Wolfgang Borri-Brunetto, Alberto Verhees, Luc Ritter, Philippe Singh, Jagmeet P. Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial |
title | Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial |
title_full | Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial |
title_fullStr | Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial |
title_short | Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial |
title_sort | contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the respond-crt trial |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27941020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brugadajosep contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT delnoypeterpaul contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT brachmannjohannes contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT reynoldsdwight contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT padelettiluigi contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT noelkergeorg contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT kantipudicharan contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT rubinlopezjosemanuel contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT dichtlwolfgang contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT borribrunettoalberto contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT verheesluc contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT ritterphilippe contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT singhjagmeetp contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial AT contractilitysensorguidedoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresultsfromtherespondcrttrial |