Cargando…

Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi

BACKGROUND: Family planning can reduce deaths, improve health, and facilitate economic development in resource-limited settings. Yet, modern contraceptive methods are often underused. This mixed-methods study, conducted in rural Burundi, sought to explain low uptake of contraceptives by identifying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ndayizigiye, M., Fawzi, M. C. Smith, Lively, C. Thompson, Ware, N.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2144-0
_version_ 1782515231496339456
author Ndayizigiye, M.
Fawzi, M. C. Smith
Lively, C. Thompson
Ware, N.C.
author_facet Ndayizigiye, M.
Fawzi, M. C. Smith
Lively, C. Thompson
Ware, N.C.
author_sort Ndayizigiye, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family planning can reduce deaths, improve health, and facilitate economic development in resource-limited settings. Yet, modern contraceptive methods are often underused. This mixed-methods study, conducted in rural Burundi, sought to explain low uptake of contraceptives by identifying utilization barriers. Results may inform development of family planning interventions in Burundi and elsewhere. METHODS: We investigated uptake of contraceptives among women of reproductive age in two rural districts of Burundi, using an explanatory sequential, mixed-methods research design. We first assessed availability and utilization rates of modern contraceptives through a facility-based survey in 39 health clinics. Barriers to uptake of contraceptives were then explored through qualitative interviews (N = 10) and focus groups (N = 7). RESULTS: Contraceptives were generally available in the 39 clinics studied, yet uptake of family planning averaged only 2.96%. Greater uptake was positively associated with the number of health professionals engaged and trained in family planning service provision, and with the number of different types of contraceptives available. Four uptake barriers were identified: (1) lack of providers to administer contraception, (2) lack of fit between available and preferred contraceptive methods, (3) a climate of fear surrounding contraceptive use, and (4) provider refusal to offer family planning services. CONCLUSIONS: Where resources are scarce, availability of modern contraceptives alone will likely not ensure uptake. Interventions addressing multiple uptake barriers simultaneously have the greatest chance of success. In rural Burundi, examples are community distribution of contraceptive methods, public information campaigns, improved training for health professionals and community health workers, and strengthening of the health infrastructure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2144-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5353936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53539362017-03-22 Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi Ndayizigiye, M. Fawzi, M. C. Smith Lively, C. Thompson Ware, N.C. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Family planning can reduce deaths, improve health, and facilitate economic development in resource-limited settings. Yet, modern contraceptive methods are often underused. This mixed-methods study, conducted in rural Burundi, sought to explain low uptake of contraceptives by identifying utilization barriers. Results may inform development of family planning interventions in Burundi and elsewhere. METHODS: We investigated uptake of contraceptives among women of reproductive age in two rural districts of Burundi, using an explanatory sequential, mixed-methods research design. We first assessed availability and utilization rates of modern contraceptives through a facility-based survey in 39 health clinics. Barriers to uptake of contraceptives were then explored through qualitative interviews (N = 10) and focus groups (N = 7). RESULTS: Contraceptives were generally available in the 39 clinics studied, yet uptake of family planning averaged only 2.96%. Greater uptake was positively associated with the number of health professionals engaged and trained in family planning service provision, and with the number of different types of contraceptives available. Four uptake barriers were identified: (1) lack of providers to administer contraception, (2) lack of fit between available and preferred contraceptive methods, (3) a climate of fear surrounding contraceptive use, and (4) provider refusal to offer family planning services. CONCLUSIONS: Where resources are scarce, availability of modern contraceptives alone will likely not ensure uptake. Interventions addressing multiple uptake barriers simultaneously have the greatest chance of success. In rural Burundi, examples are community distribution of contraceptive methods, public information campaigns, improved training for health professionals and community health workers, and strengthening of the health infrastructure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2144-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5353936/ /pubmed/28298207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2144-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ndayizigiye, M.
Fawzi, M. C. Smith
Lively, C. Thompson
Ware, N.C.
Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi
title Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi
title_full Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi
title_fullStr Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi
title_full_unstemmed Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi
title_short Understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural Burundi
title_sort understanding low uptake of contraceptives in resource-limited settings: a mixed-methods study in rural burundi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2144-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ndayizigiyem understandinglowuptakeofcontraceptivesinresourcelimitedsettingsamixedmethodsstudyinruralburundi
AT fawzimcsmith understandinglowuptakeofcontraceptivesinresourcelimitedsettingsamixedmethodsstudyinruralburundi
AT livelycthompson understandinglowuptakeofcontraceptivesinresourcelimitedsettingsamixedmethodsstudyinruralburundi
AT warenc understandinglowuptakeofcontraceptivesinresourcelimitedsettingsamixedmethodsstudyinruralburundi