Cargando…
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
BACKGROUND: The Internet has transformed scholarly publishing, most notably, by the introduction of open access publishing. Recently, there has been a rise of online journals characterized as ‘predatory’, which actively solicit manuscripts and charge publications fees without providing robust peer r...
Autores principales: | Shamseer, Larissa, Moher, David, Maduekwe, Onyi, Turner, Lucy, Barbour, Virginia, Burch, Rebecca, Clark, Jocalyn, Galipeau, James, Roberts, Jason, Shea, Beverley J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5353955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predatory or Legitimate Journals
por: Habibzadeh, Farrokh
Publicado: (2017) -
What Is a Legitimate, Low-Quality, or Predatory Surgery Journal?
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2021) -
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors’ perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)