Cargando…
A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
INTRODUCTION: E-consultations are asynchronous text-based consultations between providers which can facilitate patient access to timely specialty care. In contrast to traditional face-to-face consults, conveying and completing recommendations of the specialist is the responsibility of the referring...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116682127 |
_version_ | 1782515269153849344 |
---|---|
author | Pecina, Jennifer L Frank, Jennifer M North, Frederick |
author_facet | Pecina, Jennifer L Frank, Jennifer M North, Frederick |
author_sort | Pecina, Jennifer L |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: E-consultations are asynchronous text-based consultations between providers which can facilitate patient access to timely specialty care. In contrast to traditional face-to-face consults, conveying and completing recommendations of the specialist is the responsibility of the referring provider. This presents a new workflow for primary care providers who have multiple options (face-to-face, telephone, letter, secure message) to communicate the e-consultation recommendations. This study examines how primary care providers are managing this new workflow. METHODS: We performed a retrospective random sampling of e-consultations with individual medical record review and classified e-consultations by type of recommendation, how recommendations were communicated to patients, and whether recommendations were carried out. RESULTS: We randomly selected 220 e-consultations in 13 different specialties for review. In all, 85% of e-consultations contained recommendations for referring providers. Recommendations on medication(s) were most common (35%) followed by recommendations on ordering laboratory tests (29%). In all, 25% of the time e-consultants gave multiple possible courses of action for referring providers to choose from. Patient notification of recommendations was found for 192 (87%) of e-consultations with providers performing the notification 63% of the time and nursing staff performing the notification 37% of the time. The communication back to the patients included communication via nurse telephone calls (37%), provider telephone calls (23%), secure messages (24%), face-to-face visits (11%), and by written correspondence (5%). DISCUSSION: Managing recommendations from e-consultations results in a new workflow for primary care providers. Healthcare institutions that utilize e-consults should be aware of this new workflow. Further study is needed to determine best practices for this task that is now increasing in primary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5354179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53541792017-03-27 A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation Pecina, Jennifer L Frank, Jennifer M North, Frederick SAGE Open Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: E-consultations are asynchronous text-based consultations between providers which can facilitate patient access to timely specialty care. In contrast to traditional face-to-face consults, conveying and completing recommendations of the specialist is the responsibility of the referring provider. This presents a new workflow for primary care providers who have multiple options (face-to-face, telephone, letter, secure message) to communicate the e-consultation recommendations. This study examines how primary care providers are managing this new workflow. METHODS: We performed a retrospective random sampling of e-consultations with individual medical record review and classified e-consultations by type of recommendation, how recommendations were communicated to patients, and whether recommendations were carried out. RESULTS: We randomly selected 220 e-consultations in 13 different specialties for review. In all, 85% of e-consultations contained recommendations for referring providers. Recommendations on medication(s) were most common (35%) followed by recommendations on ordering laboratory tests (29%). In all, 25% of the time e-consultants gave multiple possible courses of action for referring providers to choose from. Patient notification of recommendations was found for 192 (87%) of e-consultations with providers performing the notification 63% of the time and nursing staff performing the notification 37% of the time. The communication back to the patients included communication via nurse telephone calls (37%), provider telephone calls (23%), secure messages (24%), face-to-face visits (11%), and by written correspondence (5%). DISCUSSION: Managing recommendations from e-consultations results in a new workflow for primary care providers. Healthcare institutions that utilize e-consults should be aware of this new workflow. Further study is needed to determine best practices for this task that is now increasing in primary care. SAGE Publications 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5354179/ /pubmed/28348734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116682127 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pecina, Jennifer L Frank, Jennifer M North, Frederick A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
title | A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
title_full | A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
title_fullStr | A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
title_short | A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
title_sort | retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116682127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pecinajenniferl aretrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation AT frankjenniferm aretrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation AT northfrederick aretrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation AT pecinajenniferl retrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation AT frankjenniferm retrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation AT northfrederick retrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation |