Cargando…

A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation

INTRODUCTION: E-consultations are asynchronous text-based consultations between providers which can facilitate patient access to timely specialty care. In contrast to traditional face-to-face consults, conveying and completing recommendations of the specialist is the responsibility of the referring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pecina, Jennifer L, Frank, Jennifer M, North, Frederick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116682127
_version_ 1782515269153849344
author Pecina, Jennifer L
Frank, Jennifer M
North, Frederick
author_facet Pecina, Jennifer L
Frank, Jennifer M
North, Frederick
author_sort Pecina, Jennifer L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: E-consultations are asynchronous text-based consultations between providers which can facilitate patient access to timely specialty care. In contrast to traditional face-to-face consults, conveying and completing recommendations of the specialist is the responsibility of the referring provider. This presents a new workflow for primary care providers who have multiple options (face-to-face, telephone, letter, secure message) to communicate the e-consultation recommendations. This study examines how primary care providers are managing this new workflow. METHODS: We performed a retrospective random sampling of e-consultations with individual medical record review and classified e-consultations by type of recommendation, how recommendations were communicated to patients, and whether recommendations were carried out. RESULTS: We randomly selected 220 e-consultations in 13 different specialties for review. In all, 85% of e-consultations contained recommendations for referring providers. Recommendations on medication(s) were most common (35%) followed by recommendations on ordering laboratory tests (29%). In all, 25% of the time e-consultants gave multiple possible courses of action for referring providers to choose from. Patient notification of recommendations was found for 192 (87%) of e-consultations with providers performing the notification 63% of the time and nursing staff performing the notification 37% of the time. The communication back to the patients included communication via nurse telephone calls (37%), provider telephone calls (23%), secure messages (24%), face-to-face visits (11%), and by written correspondence (5%). DISCUSSION: Managing recommendations from e-consultations results in a new workflow for primary care providers. Healthcare institutions that utilize e-consults should be aware of this new workflow. Further study is needed to determine best practices for this task that is now increasing in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5354179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53541792017-03-27 A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation Pecina, Jennifer L Frank, Jennifer M North, Frederick SAGE Open Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: E-consultations are asynchronous text-based consultations between providers which can facilitate patient access to timely specialty care. In contrast to traditional face-to-face consults, conveying and completing recommendations of the specialist is the responsibility of the referring provider. This presents a new workflow for primary care providers who have multiple options (face-to-face, telephone, letter, secure message) to communicate the e-consultation recommendations. This study examines how primary care providers are managing this new workflow. METHODS: We performed a retrospective random sampling of e-consultations with individual medical record review and classified e-consultations by type of recommendation, how recommendations were communicated to patients, and whether recommendations were carried out. RESULTS: We randomly selected 220 e-consultations in 13 different specialties for review. In all, 85% of e-consultations contained recommendations for referring providers. Recommendations on medication(s) were most common (35%) followed by recommendations on ordering laboratory tests (29%). In all, 25% of the time e-consultants gave multiple possible courses of action for referring providers to choose from. Patient notification of recommendations was found for 192 (87%) of e-consultations with providers performing the notification 63% of the time and nursing staff performing the notification 37% of the time. The communication back to the patients included communication via nurse telephone calls (37%), provider telephone calls (23%), secure messages (24%), face-to-face visits (11%), and by written correspondence (5%). DISCUSSION: Managing recommendations from e-consultations results in a new workflow for primary care providers. Healthcare institutions that utilize e-consults should be aware of this new workflow. Further study is needed to determine best practices for this task that is now increasing in primary care. SAGE Publications 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5354179/ /pubmed/28348734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116682127 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pecina, Jennifer L
Frank, Jennifer M
North, Frederick
A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
title A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
title_full A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
title_fullStr A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
title_short A retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
title_sort retrospective study on how primary care providers manage specialists’ recommendations after an e-consultation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116682127
work_keys_str_mv AT pecinajenniferl aretrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation
AT frankjenniferm aretrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation
AT northfrederick aretrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation
AT pecinajenniferl retrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation
AT frankjenniferm retrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation
AT northfrederick retrospectivestudyonhowprimarycareprovidersmanagespecialistsrecommendationsafteraneconsultation