Cargando…

Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts

Only two parasite interactions are known for Drosophila to date: Allantonematid nematodes associated with mycophagous Drosophilids and the ectoparasitic mite Macrocheles subbadius with the Sonoran Desert endemic Drosophila nigrospiracula. Unlike the nematode-Drosophila association, breadth of mite p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez-Leanos, Alejandra, Loustalot-Laclette, Mariana Ramirez, Nazario-Yepiz, Nestor, Markow, Therese Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998
_version_ 1782515276962594816
author Perez-Leanos, Alejandra
Loustalot-Laclette, Mariana Ramirez
Nazario-Yepiz, Nestor
Markow, Therese Ann
author_facet Perez-Leanos, Alejandra
Loustalot-Laclette, Mariana Ramirez
Nazario-Yepiz, Nestor
Markow, Therese Ann
author_sort Perez-Leanos, Alejandra
collection PubMed
description Only two parasite interactions are known for Drosophila to date: Allantonematid nematodes associated with mycophagous Drosophilids and the ectoparasitic mite Macrocheles subbadius with the Sonoran Desert endemic Drosophila nigrospiracula. Unlike the nematode-Drosophila association, breadth of mite parasitism on Drosophila species is unknown. As M. subbadius is a generalist, parasitism of additional Drosophilids is expected. We determined the extent and distribution of mite parasitism in nature Drosophilids collected in Mexico and southern California. Thirteen additional species of Drosophilids were infested. Interestingly, 10 belong to the repleta species group of the subgenus Drosophila, despite the fact that the majority of flies collected were of the subgenus Sophophora. In all cases but 2, the associated mites were M. subbadius. Drosophila hexastigma was found to have not only M. subbadius, but another Mesostigmatid mite, Paragarmania bakeri, as well. One D. hydei was also found to have a mite from genus Lasioseius attached. In both choice and no-choice experiments, mites were more attracted to repleta group species than to Sophophoran. The extent of mite parasitism clearly is much broader than previously reported and suggests a host bias mediated either by mite preference and/or some mechanism of resistance in particular Drosophilid lineages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5354228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53542282017-03-27 Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts Perez-Leanos, Alejandra Loustalot-Laclette, Mariana Ramirez Nazario-Yepiz, Nestor Markow, Therese Ann Fly (Austin) Research Paper Only two parasite interactions are known for Drosophila to date: Allantonematid nematodes associated with mycophagous Drosophilids and the ectoparasitic mite Macrocheles subbadius with the Sonoran Desert endemic Drosophila nigrospiracula. Unlike the nematode-Drosophila association, breadth of mite parasitism on Drosophila species is unknown. As M. subbadius is a generalist, parasitism of additional Drosophilids is expected. We determined the extent and distribution of mite parasitism in nature Drosophilids collected in Mexico and southern California. Thirteen additional species of Drosophilids were infested. Interestingly, 10 belong to the repleta species group of the subgenus Drosophila, despite the fact that the majority of flies collected were of the subgenus Sophophora. In all cases but 2, the associated mites were M. subbadius. Drosophila hexastigma was found to have not only M. subbadius, but another Mesostigmatid mite, Paragarmania bakeri, as well. One D. hydei was also found to have a mite from genus Lasioseius attached. In both choice and no-choice experiments, mites were more attracted to repleta group species than to Sophophoran. The extent of mite parasitism clearly is much broader than previously reported and suggests a host bias mediated either by mite preference and/or some mechanism of resistance in particular Drosophilid lineages. Taylor & Francis 2016-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5354228/ /pubmed/27540774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Perez-Leanos, Alejandra
Loustalot-Laclette, Mariana Ramirez
Nazario-Yepiz, Nestor
Markow, Therese Ann
Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts
title Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts
title_full Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts
title_fullStr Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts
title_full_unstemmed Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts
title_short Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts
title_sort ectoparasitic mites and their drosophila hosts
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998
work_keys_str_mv AT perezleanosalejandra ectoparasiticmitesandtheirdrosophilahosts
AT loustalotlaclettemarianaramirez ectoparasiticmitesandtheirdrosophilahosts
AT nazarioyepiznestor ectoparasiticmitesandtheirdrosophilahosts
AT markowthereseann ectoparasiticmitesandtheirdrosophilahosts