Cargando…
Adaptation to random and systematic errors: Comparison of amputee and non-amputee control interfaces with varying levels of process noise
The objective of this study was to understand how people adapt to errors when using a myoelectric control interface. We compared adaptation across 1) non-amputee subjects using joint angle, joint torque, and myoelectric control interfaces, and 2) amputee subjects using myoelectric control interfaces...
Autores principales: | Johnson, Reva E., Kording, Konrad P., Hargrove, Levi J., Sensinger, Jonathon W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170473 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Joint speed feedback improves myoelectric prosthesis adaptation after perturbed reaches in non amputees
por: Earley, Eric J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Does EMG control lead to distinct motor adaptation?
por: Johnson, Reva E., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Gait Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees on Level Ground in a Cohort of 53 Amputees - Comparison of Kinetics and Kinematics With Non-amputees
por: Pröbsting, E, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Sprint Start Kinetics of Amputee and Non-Amputee Sprinters
por: Willwacher, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Real-Time Adaptation of an Artificial Neural Network for Transfemoral Amputees Using a Powered Prosthesis
por: Woodward, Richard B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)