Cargando…
Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study
BACKGROUND: Despite substantial falls in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in the United Kingdom (UK), marked socioeconomic inequalities in CHD risk factors and CHD mortality persist. We investigated whether inequity in CHD healthcare in Wales (UK) could contribute to the observed social gradie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172618 |
_version_ | 1782515283672432640 |
---|---|
author | King, William Lacey, Arron White, James Farewell, Daniel Dunstan, Frank Fone, David |
author_facet | King, William Lacey, Arron White, James Farewell, Daniel Dunstan, Frank Fone, David |
author_sort | King, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite substantial falls in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in the United Kingdom (UK), marked socioeconomic inequalities in CHD risk factors and CHD mortality persist. We investigated whether inequity in CHD healthcare in Wales (UK) could contribute to the observed social gradient in CHD mortality. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Linking data from primary and secondary care we constructed an electronic cohort of individuals (n = 1199342) with six year follow-up, 2004–2010. We identified indications for recommended CHD interventions, measured time to their delivery, and estimated risk of receiving the interventions for each of five ordered deprivation groups using a time-to-event approach with Cox regression frailty models. Interventions in primary and secondary prevention included risk-factor measurement, smoking management, statins and antihypertensive therapy, and in established CHD included medication and revascularization. For primary prevention, five of the 11 models favoured the more deprived and one favoured the less deprived. For medication in secondary prevention and established CHD, one of the 15 models favoured the more deprived and one the less deprived. In relation to revascularization, six of the 12 models favoured the less deprived and none favoured the more deprived–this evidence of inequity exemplified by a hazard ratio for revascularization in stable angina of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.92). The main study limitation is the possibility of under-ascertainment or misclassification of clinical indications and treatment from variability in coding. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care components of CHD healthcare were equitably delivered. Evidence of inequity was found for revascularization procedures, although this inequity is likely to have only a modest effect on social gradients in CHD mortality. Policymakers should focus on reducing inequalities in CHD risk factors, particularly smoking, as these, rather than inequity in healthcare, are likely to be key drivers of inequalities in CHD mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5354260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53542602017-04-06 Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study King, William Lacey, Arron White, James Farewell, Daniel Dunstan, Frank Fone, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite substantial falls in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in the United Kingdom (UK), marked socioeconomic inequalities in CHD risk factors and CHD mortality persist. We investigated whether inequity in CHD healthcare in Wales (UK) could contribute to the observed social gradient in CHD mortality. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Linking data from primary and secondary care we constructed an electronic cohort of individuals (n = 1199342) with six year follow-up, 2004–2010. We identified indications for recommended CHD interventions, measured time to their delivery, and estimated risk of receiving the interventions for each of five ordered deprivation groups using a time-to-event approach with Cox regression frailty models. Interventions in primary and secondary prevention included risk-factor measurement, smoking management, statins and antihypertensive therapy, and in established CHD included medication and revascularization. For primary prevention, five of the 11 models favoured the more deprived and one favoured the less deprived. For medication in secondary prevention and established CHD, one of the 15 models favoured the more deprived and one the less deprived. In relation to revascularization, six of the 12 models favoured the less deprived and none favoured the more deprived–this evidence of inequity exemplified by a hazard ratio for revascularization in stable angina of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.92). The main study limitation is the possibility of under-ascertainment or misclassification of clinical indications and treatment from variability in coding. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care components of CHD healthcare were equitably delivered. Evidence of inequity was found for revascularization procedures, although this inequity is likely to have only a modest effect on social gradients in CHD mortality. Policymakers should focus on reducing inequalities in CHD risk factors, particularly smoking, as these, rather than inequity in healthcare, are likely to be key drivers of inequalities in CHD mortality. Public Library of Science 2017-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5354260/ /pubmed/28301496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172618 Text en © 2017 King et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article King, William Lacey, Arron White, James Farewell, Daniel Dunstan, Frank Fone, David Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study |
title | Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study |
title_full | Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study |
title_fullStr | Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study |
title_short | Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004–2010: A population-based electronic cohort study |
title_sort | equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, wales (uk) 2004–2010: a population-based electronic cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kingwilliam equityinhealthcareforcoronaryheartdiseasewalesuk20042010apopulationbasedelectroniccohortstudy AT laceyarron equityinhealthcareforcoronaryheartdiseasewalesuk20042010apopulationbasedelectroniccohortstudy AT whitejames equityinhealthcareforcoronaryheartdiseasewalesuk20042010apopulationbasedelectroniccohortstudy AT farewelldaniel equityinhealthcareforcoronaryheartdiseasewalesuk20042010apopulationbasedelectroniccohortstudy AT dunstanfrank equityinhealthcareforcoronaryheartdiseasewalesuk20042010apopulationbasedelectroniccohortstudy AT fonedavid equityinhealthcareforcoronaryheartdiseasewalesuk20042010apopulationbasedelectroniccohortstudy |