Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) for interpretation of chest radiographs compared to conventional radiography (CR) using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 199 patients (75 femal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174285 |
_version_ | 1782515320002445312 |
---|---|
author | Martini, Katharina Baessler, Marco Baumueller, Stephan Frauenfelder, Thomas |
author_facet | Martini, Katharina Baessler, Marco Baumueller, Stephan Frauenfelder, Thomas |
author_sort | Martini, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) for interpretation of chest radiographs compared to conventional radiography (CR) using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 199 patients (75 female, median age 67) were included in this institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial. All patients were scanned in posteroanterior and lateral direction with dual-shot DE-technique. Chest CT was performed within ±72 hours. The system provides three types of images: bone weighted-image, soft tissue weighted-image, herein termed as DESR-images, and a standard image, termed CR-image (marked as CR-image). Images were evaluated by two radiologists for presence of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, infectious consolidation, interstitial lung changes, tumor, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations, aortic or tracheal calcification and pleural thickening. Inter-observer agreement between readers and diagnostic performance were calculated. McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences. RESULTS: Mean inter-observer agreement throughout the investigated parameters was higher in DESR images compared to CR-images (k(DESR) = 0.935 vs. k(CR) = 0.858). DESR images provided significantly increased sensitivity compared to CR-images for the detection of infectious consolidations (42% vs. 62%), tumor (46% vs. 57%), interstitial lung changes (69% vs. 87%) and aortic or tracheal calcification (25 vs. 73%) (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sensitivity for the detection of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations or pleural thickening (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: DESR increases significantly the sensibility without affecting the specificity evaluating chest radiographs, with emphasis on the detection of interstitial lung diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5354458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53544582017-04-06 Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference Martini, Katharina Baessler, Marco Baumueller, Stephan Frauenfelder, Thomas PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) for interpretation of chest radiographs compared to conventional radiography (CR) using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 199 patients (75 female, median age 67) were included in this institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial. All patients were scanned in posteroanterior and lateral direction with dual-shot DE-technique. Chest CT was performed within ±72 hours. The system provides three types of images: bone weighted-image, soft tissue weighted-image, herein termed as DESR-images, and a standard image, termed CR-image (marked as CR-image). Images were evaluated by two radiologists for presence of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, infectious consolidation, interstitial lung changes, tumor, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations, aortic or tracheal calcification and pleural thickening. Inter-observer agreement between readers and diagnostic performance were calculated. McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences. RESULTS: Mean inter-observer agreement throughout the investigated parameters was higher in DESR images compared to CR-images (k(DESR) = 0.935 vs. k(CR) = 0.858). DESR images provided significantly increased sensitivity compared to CR-images for the detection of infectious consolidations (42% vs. 62%), tumor (46% vs. 57%), interstitial lung changes (69% vs. 87%) and aortic or tracheal calcification (25 vs. 73%) (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sensitivity for the detection of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations or pleural thickening (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: DESR increases significantly the sensibility without affecting the specificity evaluating chest radiographs, with emphasis on the detection of interstitial lung diseases. Public Library of Science 2017-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5354458/ /pubmed/28301584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174285 Text en © 2017 Martini et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martini, Katharina Baessler, Marco Baumueller, Stephan Frauenfelder, Thomas Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
title | Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinikatharina diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference AT baesslermarco diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference AT baumuellerstephan diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference AT frauenfelderthomas diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference |