Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) for interpretation of chest radiographs compared to conventional radiography (CR) using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 199 patients (75 femal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martini, Katharina, Baessler, Marco, Baumueller, Stephan, Frauenfelder, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174285
_version_ 1782515320002445312
author Martini, Katharina
Baessler, Marco
Baumueller, Stephan
Frauenfelder, Thomas
author_facet Martini, Katharina
Baessler, Marco
Baumueller, Stephan
Frauenfelder, Thomas
author_sort Martini, Katharina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) for interpretation of chest radiographs compared to conventional radiography (CR) using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 199 patients (75 female, median age 67) were included in this institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial. All patients were scanned in posteroanterior and lateral direction with dual-shot DE-technique. Chest CT was performed within ±72 hours. The system provides three types of images: bone weighted-image, soft tissue weighted-image, herein termed as DESR-images, and a standard image, termed CR-image (marked as CR-image). Images were evaluated by two radiologists for presence of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, infectious consolidation, interstitial lung changes, tumor, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations, aortic or tracheal calcification and pleural thickening. Inter-observer agreement between readers and diagnostic performance were calculated. McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences. RESULTS: Mean inter-observer agreement throughout the investigated parameters was higher in DESR images compared to CR-images (k(DESR) = 0.935 vs. k(CR) = 0.858). DESR images provided significantly increased sensitivity compared to CR-images for the detection of infectious consolidations (42% vs. 62%), tumor (46% vs. 57%), interstitial lung changes (69% vs. 87%) and aortic or tracheal calcification (25 vs. 73%) (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sensitivity for the detection of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations or pleural thickening (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: DESR increases significantly the sensibility without affecting the specificity evaluating chest radiographs, with emphasis on the detection of interstitial lung diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5354458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53544582017-04-06 Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference Martini, Katharina Baessler, Marco Baumueller, Stephan Frauenfelder, Thomas PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR) for interpretation of chest radiographs compared to conventional radiography (CR) using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 199 patients (75 female, median age 67) were included in this institutional review board (IRB)-approved clinical trial. All patients were scanned in posteroanterior and lateral direction with dual-shot DE-technique. Chest CT was performed within ±72 hours. The system provides three types of images: bone weighted-image, soft tissue weighted-image, herein termed as DESR-images, and a standard image, termed CR-image (marked as CR-image). Images were evaluated by two radiologists for presence of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, infectious consolidation, interstitial lung changes, tumor, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations, aortic or tracheal calcification and pleural thickening. Inter-observer agreement between readers and diagnostic performance were calculated. McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences. RESULTS: Mean inter-observer agreement throughout the investigated parameters was higher in DESR images compared to CR-images (k(DESR) = 0.935 vs. k(CR) = 0.858). DESR images provided significantly increased sensitivity compared to CR-images for the detection of infectious consolidations (42% vs. 62%), tumor (46% vs. 57%), interstitial lung changes (69% vs. 87%) and aortic or tracheal calcification (25 vs. 73%) (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sensitivity for the detection of inserted life support lines, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, skeletal alterations, soft tissue alterations or pleural thickening (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: DESR increases significantly the sensibility without affecting the specificity evaluating chest radiographs, with emphasis on the detection of interstitial lung diseases. Public Library of Science 2017-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5354458/ /pubmed/28301584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174285 Text en © 2017 Martini et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martini, Katharina
Baessler, Marco
Baumueller, Stephan
Frauenfelder, Thomas
Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
title Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
title_full Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
title_short Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
title_sort diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28301584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174285
work_keys_str_mv AT martinikatharina diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference
AT baesslermarco diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference
AT baumuellerstephan diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference
AT frauenfelderthomas diagnosticaccuracyandaddedvalueofdualenergysubtractionradiographycomparedtostandardconventionalradiographyusingcomputedtomographyasstandardofreference