Cargando…

A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland

BACKGROUND: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common form of retinal detachment and an ophthalmic emergency. Here, we compared outcomes of primary RRD eyes operated with conventional scleral buckling (SB) with cryoretinopexy to those operated with standard pars plana vitrectomy (PP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahanne, Sari, Tuuminen, Raimo, Haukka, Jari, Loukovaara, Sirpa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331284
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S128746
_version_ 1782515326738497536
author Sahanne, Sari
Tuuminen, Raimo
Haukka, Jari
Loukovaara, Sirpa
author_facet Sahanne, Sari
Tuuminen, Raimo
Haukka, Jari
Loukovaara, Sirpa
author_sort Sahanne, Sari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common form of retinal detachment and an ophthalmic emergency. Here, we compared outcomes of primary RRD eyes operated with conventional scleral buckling (SB) with cryoretinopexy to those operated with standard pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS: This is an institutional, retrospective, register-based, observational, comparative study. Based on the surgical procedure, 319 eyes of 319 patients were divided into two groups: SB plus cryotherapy (n=50) and PPV (n=269). Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at 30 days and reoperation rates within 180 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Eyes operated with PPV had less reoperations within the first 180 days as compared with SB eyes (P=0.001, log-rank test); however, changes in IOP were more prominent (mean ± standard deviation: +8.1±8.8 vs. +4.4±7.0 mmHg, respectively; P=0.006). Changes in BCVA did not differ between the surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: PPV was associated with higher primary anatomic success rates and lower risk of reoperation but significant IOP elevation when compared to SB. These factors should be case-specifically considered when choosing treatment modality for primary RRD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5354527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53545272017-03-22 A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland Sahanne, Sari Tuuminen, Raimo Haukka, Jari Loukovaara, Sirpa Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common form of retinal detachment and an ophthalmic emergency. Here, we compared outcomes of primary RRD eyes operated with conventional scleral buckling (SB) with cryoretinopexy to those operated with standard pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS: This is an institutional, retrospective, register-based, observational, comparative study. Based on the surgical procedure, 319 eyes of 319 patients were divided into two groups: SB plus cryotherapy (n=50) and PPV (n=269). Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at 30 days and reoperation rates within 180 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Eyes operated with PPV had less reoperations within the first 180 days as compared with SB eyes (P=0.001, log-rank test); however, changes in IOP were more prominent (mean ± standard deviation: +8.1±8.8 vs. +4.4±7.0 mmHg, respectively; P=0.006). Changes in BCVA did not differ between the surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: PPV was associated with higher primary anatomic success rates and lower risk of reoperation but significant IOP elevation when compared to SB. These factors should be case-specifically considered when choosing treatment modality for primary RRD. Dove Medical Press 2017-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5354527/ /pubmed/28331284 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S128746 Text en © 2017 Sahanne et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sahanne, Sari
Tuuminen, Raimo
Haukka, Jari
Loukovaara, Sirpa
A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland
title A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland
title_full A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland
title_fullStr A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland
title_short A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland
title_sort retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in finland
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331284
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S128746
work_keys_str_mv AT sahannesari aretrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT tuuminenraimo aretrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT haukkajari aretrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT loukovaarasirpa aretrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT sahannesari retrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT tuuminenraimo retrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT haukkajari retrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland
AT loukovaarasirpa retrospectivestudycomparingoutcomesofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentrepairbyscleralbucklingandparsplanavitrectomyinfinland