Cargando…

Quantitative assessment of Zirconium-89 labeled cetuximab using PET/CT imaging in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: a theragnostic approach

Biomarkers predicting treatment response to the monoclonal antibody cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LAHNSCC) are lacking. We hypothesize that tumor accessibility is an important factor in treatment success of the EGFR targeting drug. We quantified uptake of cetu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Even, Aniek J.G., Hamming-Vrieze, Olga, van Elmpt, Wouter, Winnepenninckx, Véronique J.L., Heukelom, Jolien, Tesselaar, Margot E.T., Vogel, Wouter V., Hoeben, Ann, Zegers, Catharina M.L., Vugts, Daniëlle J., van Dongen, Guus A.M.S., Bartelink, Harry, Mottaghy, Felix M., Hoebers, Frank, Lambin, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5354801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965472
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13910
Descripción
Sumario:Biomarkers predicting treatment response to the monoclonal antibody cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LAHNSCC) are lacking. We hypothesize that tumor accessibility is an important factor in treatment success of the EGFR targeting drug. We quantified uptake of cetuximab labeled with Zirconium-89 ((89)Zr) using PET/CT imaging. Seventeen patients with stage III-IV LAHNSCC received a loading dose unlabeled cetuximab, followed by 10 mg 54.5±9.6 MBq (89)Zr-cetuximab. PET/CT images were acquired either 3 and 6 or 4 and 7 days post-injection. (89)Zr-cetuximab uptake was quantified using standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and correlated to EGFR immunohistochemistry. TBR was compared between scan days to determine optimal timing. Uptake of (89)Zr-cetuximab varied between patients (day 6-7: SUV(peak) range 2.5-6.2). TBR increased significantly (49±28%, p < 0.01) between first (1.1±0.3) and second scan (1.7±0.6). Between groups with a low and high EGFR expression a significant difference in SUV(mean) (2.1 versus 3.0) and SUV(peak) (3.2 versus 4.7) was found, however, not in TBR. Data is available at www.cancerdata.org (DOI: 10.17195/candat.2016.11.1). In conclusion, (89)Zr-cetuximab PET imaging shows large inter-patient variety in LAHNSCC and provides additional information over FDG-PET and EGFR expression. Validation of the predictive value is recommended with scans acquired 6-7 days post-injection.